>chainlink does everything iexec can do with the help of the google partnership
The ignorance of some "investors" makes me cringe. I hold both LINK and RLC because they both have a chance of success in different areas.
user, you really really need to go and read more about what iExec does. Based on your comment I know you are not a highly-technical person, so hopefully you have some friends who can help explain this to you. I don't mean to patronize you - it is a complicated topic and there is a lot to pick up.
You need to understand that LINK does one thing - lets a smart contract retrieve data from a web 2.0 API. iExec can do this, along with many things that are at least two years away for LINK.
Example: I have a smart contract, and I want to make decisions based on the current ETH price.
I can use Chainlink or iExec for this - both will do the job.
Next example: I have a smart contract, and I want to make decisions based on the output of a program I wrote.
iExec can do this, but Chainlink can't.
Next example: I have a trained AI model, which I want to use to earn money. I want to allow people to query this model, without being able to steal my data.
iExec can do this, but Chainlink can't.
I could go on and on... if you think Chainlink does everything iExec can do, you have no idea what you are talking about.
PS The Google "partnership" is just Google's data sources connected to Chainlink nodes via API calls. iExec can do this too, no partnership required.
And I haven't even explained why iExec's oracles are currently superior to Chainlinks.
If only you knew how good it really is
thanks this is going in my copypasta folder
I wish more people would realize this, that 'chainlink can do everything your coin does plus one' crowd is fucking annoying
>next bullrun
We're literally in a bull run right now and it's doing nothing but losing you money lmao
Also theyre not partnered with ibm theyre just using IBM'S services like millions of other small businesses do. Me using an iphone doesnt mean im partnered with apple.
This is the new skycoin shilling except whats even sadder is this doesnt even seem like its paid shilling. Its just a handful of delusional bag holders constantly telling themselves they made the right choice as they watch helplessly as their bags get heavier and heavier as decent cryptos moon more and more.
This post is for newfags by the way. Dont buy this shit look atbthe volume and the yearly chart. Dying shitcoin.
> claims that iexec is 2 years ahead of link
> claims the same shit that retarded link holders do, that iexec can do everything link can and more
It's kind of rich that you're trying to call someone else out for being nontechnical, but this board is filled with ultracrepidarian faggots so I'm hardly surprised.
Best of luck with your investment and all that though.
>claims the same shit that retarded link holders do, that iexec can do everything link can and more
Did you miss the part where I gave two specific examples of things iExec can do, that Chainlink can't?
It's really not difficult:
One group claims A does more than B, with no evidence.
One group claims B does more than A, and gives specific examples.
>It's kind of rich that you're trying to call someone else out for being nontechnical
Why is that rich? I am more technical than the person I replied to, obviously. It also appears I am more technical than you, as you have been unable to counter any of the technical points I made.
If you think my examples were incorrect, explain why. Otherwise you have nothing of value to add and might as well keep quiet.
Giving specific examples isnt evidence retatd. Evidence would be evidence of people actually using your shitcoin for the purposes you claim. And there isnt any evidence of that because no ones using it cos its shit. At least there is real world evidence that people are using Link for a limited use case right now. Not hypothetical, 'in the future it will be able to do this' bullshit Soonboy speculation. People are using link right now. No one is using rlc and no one ever will.
I smell curry. If you want non-curry gains, buy Zuckbucks.
>Giving specific examples isnt evidence retatd.
I'm not sure how to respond to this level of stupidity. I gave specific examples of things iExec can do that Chainlink can't. That is evidence that - on a technical level - iExec is further advanced than Chainlink.
>Evidence would be evidence of people actually using your shitcoin for the purposes you claim
You are attempting to move the goalposts. My claim is that iExec is CAPABLE of these things, not that they are widely adopted. Level of adoption is irrelevant when we are discussing the possibilities offered by each platform.
>Not hypothetical, 'in the future it will be able to do this' bullshit Soonboy speculation.
Wow you are uninformed. All of the things I listed as iExec capabilities can be done today. It is not theoretical. I bet you don't even realize that iExec already allows you to execute Docker containers in an SGX environment with cryptographically verified inputs and outputs.
>No one is using rlc and no one ever will.
Time will tell.
Let's keep this discussion on a technical level. I listed three problems, and showed that Chainlink can only solve one of them. Do you disagree with that statement? If so, demonstrate how Chainlink can solve those problems, or demonstrate that iExec can not solve them,
If you can't respond with a technical argument showing why I am wrong, you are admitting that iExec is currently superior technology to Chainlink. We're waiting...
>most advanced system in the world
>no one uses it
>adoption doesnt matter