Hey Jow Forums, you made the news. I think I saw a Forbes article the other day too.
Hey Jow Forums, you made the news. I think I saw a Forbes article the other day too
Jonathan Ramirez
Other urls found in this thread:
Brody Hall
wow that user's plan worked apparently
Robert Roberts
It's not that bad
cripple.biz
Aaron Gomez
Nice, I remember that thread. Good to see anons are actually doing real damage to that centralized shitcoin
Christopher Nguyen
>Nice, I remember that thread. Good to see anons are actually doing real damage to that centralized shitcoin
IndImm creator here. This isn't doing any real damage.
Joshua Powell
Then what was the point of it lol
Lucas Cox
Cool shit , I am that other account that uploaded all that shit and mirrored your gh-pages branch to cripple.biz in cloudfront.
When can we expect the transaction retries to come out? I can barely get past 300 KB files without having to try 20 to 30 times .
Isaiah Hall
Thank you for your service
Also checked
Eli Morgan
Legitimately for anti-censorship
>When can we expect the transaction retries to come out? I can barely get past 300 KB files without having to try 20 to 30 times .
That will be released at the earliest tomorrow night and latest Tuesday night
Thanks for the mirror.
Hudson Fisher
Is it giving the red fatal error message?
Brayden Perez
Cool , I'll keep an eye out
Xavier Garcia
last i heard their fix is just to increase the cost of using the blockchain to help fight the spam. they are going to destroy their own product because its useless
Aiden James
I already have a few workarounds/fixes ready for that
Luke Flores
are you indimm from the original thread?
your doing the lords work if so
Elijah Turner
>are you indimm from the original thread?
Indeed, check my tripcode
Thanks for the kind words
Tyler Young
checked and greatjob
Cameron Taylor
Twitter btfo
Jason Ward
Yeah, console output indicates it could not verify the previous transaction , seems like a race condition where they ping some kind of ack back but don't store the transaction and your check fails for the hash.
I have had a 100% CPU loop on the verification stage also where the transaction does not exist for some reason also, sorry I don't have console output all you need to do to replicate any of this is try a file larger than a couple hundred K. I would file this on GitHub to have a tracker, but honestly I am pretty active there and am not sure about anynominity regardless of the safeguards I take.
Jaxson Morris
Yeah, the main problem is that all transactions have to occur sequentially and for some reason I'm getting a success message back from ripple on say transaction 56/100 but when it submits transaction 57, it says 56 was never complete.
All good on the logs, and believe me, I completely get the anonymity concerns based on the backlash
Jacob Lewis
>Builds "Indestructible. Immutable. Infinite File Storage."
>Users use it
>Devs suddenly cry "STOP!"
wat
Nicholas Baker
jesus christ I remember when he first posted this who has the caps...and also where do I buy
Leo Wilson
How much would it cost to put Tarrants video on there?
Angel Robinson
Dubs confirm praise kek
Jack Young
The fundemental problem and the thing that makes this so much different than other blockchain hosted stuff is that Ripple hosts their shit to be accessible via a websocket connection.
So in the case of content distribution they are technically on the hook to take action on DMCA requests and other takedown notices . It is not like other blockchain stuff that needs a server in the middle to convert the data to something a user's browser can consume.
This aspect is unpatchable , they literally need to rethink their entire infrastructure and core protocol to address this , or just start admitting they are centralized and pruning shit from the ledger.
Brandon Lopez
That's intense. I want to hear more. How does this websocket connection work with ripple
Dylan Green
At least upload his manifesto
Hunter Peterson
lmao this is awesome. hats off to you sir