I'm going to redpill you on iExec

listen to what he says.
the tech is 5 years out.
wait until it's useful, then maybe think about it.

100$ is fud actually.
Nice try fudding but you failed
>invest when it's adopted
How to stay poor 101

OP you realise that as soon as ETH 2.0 releases your shitcoin becomes obsolete? Ride the pump while it lasts

ETH will never be able to do what iExec is capable of doing.

What ever happened with Intel? Oh, nothing cause they are going to risk working with a unregistered security! Why do you newfags love these scams so much?

Funny how the anti-RLC people never have a valid technical argument to make. Just brainlet-level comments they are repeating because they saw someone else say it and thought it looked cool.
RLC is more advanced than LINK and nobody in this thread is capable of making a technical argument that disproves this.
ETH 2.0 does not do trustless off-chain computing stupid. You are comparing apples and oranges. RLC complements ETH's capabilities by moving private computations off-chain. They are not competing with each other.

Cringe tier fud.
They are working on a market prediction dApp that will most likely be released with v4.
>unregistered security fud
They hired multiple lawyers to establish whether it would be considered as a security. It isn't one.

medium.com/iex-ec/rlc-token-state-of-the-exchanges-a2554a242d42

You mean like this? software.intel.com/en-us/articles/can-a-blockchain-controlled-robot-change-the-future
Fuck you are stupid. Do you even think about researching your beliefs before sharing them with the rest of us?
Try again, but this time google your fud first to make sure it is not disproved by the first page of results.

Fuckin rekt these fudding fags.

You believe them, HA HA HA HA
Oh you're SO intelligent shilling a shitcoin let me bow down to you!
Let me check the chart, oh look it been on a downward trend since Jan '18!
HA HA HA HA Imagine calling others stupid when you shill a coin thats on a 20 month down trend!
Fuck off tards

It's too easy bro. I wish they would bring some intelligent fud so it was more of a challenge to counter. I feel like we are playing basketball against some five year olds.
>Funny how the anti-RLC people never have a valid technical argument to make.
I know RLC has been on a downtrend. I picked up my stack recently so I'm barely even down. But that's not the point... where is your technical argument? RLC is technically superior to LINK. Prove me wrong if you are so intelligent.
>HA HA HA HA Imagine calling others stupid when you shill a coin thats on a 20 month down trend!
That guy said ETH 2.0 will render RLC obsolete. It is obvious that he doesn't understand ETH 2.0 or RLC... so yeah he's stupid. Anyone who thinks ETH 2.0 will do off-chain trusted computing is stupid, because that is not the goal of ETH 2.0.

You sound like a 12 year old
Zero substance. Fuck off.

Ok that's a pretty good thing to consider, I might pick some up just based on a longer term crypto hold, but I want to get more of a redpill on it. Does anyone on biz have the capability to redpill me on this coin? It seems really complex and may be hard to shill

personally I think PoCo is really revolutionary

other than that you'll hear about partnerships with Intel, IBM, Alibaba Cloud, some others I forget

the low supply too seems really attractive

can you simply explain why it is revolutionary?
the partnerships are definitely impressive, it makes no sense the marketcap is so low, its a main reason why i want to invest
low supply is really nice too, plus the devs dont hold a lot either

utility token for decentralized cloud computing with consensus

helped write the EEA Trusted Compute Spec V1 along with intel
>The Trusted Computing specification enables privacy in blockchain translations, moving intensive processing from a main blockchain to improve scalability and latency, and support of attested Oracles
If there's a future for ethereum/ blockchain TEE computations iexec will be there

Okay so is it better than every other cloud coin?
That's cool that they're very involved in the computing blockchain space, makes me want to go all in to be honest.

So obvious too, like he’s doing it on purpose.

Check the archives. On Saturday there was a great thread which showed how RLC is superior to LINK. Multiple redpills dropped. Link it here if you find it?

>If there's a future for ethereum/ blockchain TEE computations
Why does TEE computations need blocchain?

>Why does TEE computations need blocchain?
They don't, it's the other way around - blockchain needs TEE.
On-chain computation is expensive. Off-chain computation is cheap but needs to be trusted... unless you have TEE, in which case you can do off-chain computation and cryptographically verify the results. Off-chain computation with all the security of on-chain computation.
That last sentence sums up why I hold RLC.

>when you forget to switch IDs
Fucking lmaooooo

Iexec threads are 99% one massive bagholder talking to himself.

whoops forgot to switch ip

Feels good knowing I hold the next literal 50000x. Don't pay any mind to these actual retards trying to fud with "muh samefagging", what year is it, 2011?

> you can take any Docker container and execute it in an SGX environment, and cryptographically verify that the code/inputs/outputs were not tampered with, and your program was executed correctly. This is live and working today.

Cool. And you also don't need iExec for that, you can literally do the same on any SGX enabled PC. Token not needed, I verified with my eyes.

The literal state of iExec fud.
Something big must be coming because there's a ton of low quality fud as of late.

The board is literally spammed by pajeets trying to pump RLC and when one screws up and samefags, you call it intentional fud? Pathetic..

cool argument pranjanrashnesh, did you learn that in mumbai college for special needs ?

based bald cryptomancer

That guy is obviously over excited and shilling his bags. But that doesn't change the fact RLC is technically superior to LINK. Nobody who is familiar with both projects can debate that.

>Implying he didn't samefag on purpose while copying technical comments from the other redpill thread to act like he's another user. Cringe.

What would I need to argue against what you said makes zero sense in the first place. You can use a decentralized marketplace with docker without iExec? Cool story bro

>But that doesn't change the fact RLC is technically superior to LINK.
Only reason you're so obsessed with Link is because you missed that boat bagholding iexec.

Your cope is showing. I hold both coins but it's clear you're a retard since you try to fud RLC like a 12 year old

>decentralized marketplace
That wasn't part of what he responded to.

That's literally what he's talking about when he says "take a docker container and execute it in ..." He's just explaining iExec in long form.

you guys didn't listen... many competitors for what your coin do countless really. both known and dark horses. there is only 1 bitcoin. despite what cashies and curry cashies shrill about that's btc. and btc overtaking gold in market cap is a when not an if. which would mean $350k per coin.

Attached: shitcoins.jpg (1883x2207, 2.78M)

This is the same argument made two years ago by people who didn't comprehend link.
Ok now how do you trigger that job from a smart contract? How do you have multiple people execute it and validate the result consensus? How does your sgx app return its result to your smart contract? How do I validate the sgx proof on chain?
Now I need to run my own sgx hardware and I'm responsible for its maintenance and upgrades.
>why do I need AWS when I can host my web site from a raspberry pi?
That's the same intelligence level as the argument you tried to make. Want to try again with something less stupid this time? I've yet to hear a single good technical argument against rlc. Based on your first attempt you're not going to be the one to make it.

It's like you don't even realize what a decentralized computing marketplace even is or allows people to do hahahhaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahagahahahahahahahaha

What he was responding to was this quote by you:
>you can take any Docker container and execute it in an SGX environment, and cryptographically verify that the code/inputs/outputs were not tampered with, and your program was executed correctly. This is live and working today.

This is the basic function of an enclave, for which you obviously do not need iexec, and there is no mention of any "decentralized marketplace".

This is my post you thieving prick.
I hold link too stupid. And have done since 20c.
Does you understand that some people invest in competing products because both will succeed in different ways? Another tribalist loser who won't make it.

Holy shit you're a literal retard he's saying you can do that over the iExec marketplace. If you don't understand the implications of the technology just say so, because it seems to me that you don't.

>he's saying you can do that over the iExec marketplace
No he isn't.

a literal french baggette, they dropped the blockchain compooting and started to chase after chainlink, top fkin kek, little frenchies running after american innovators OH NO NO NO

you obviously have no technical experience if you think you need a iExec to run a docker container or use SGX. Not responding to your dumbass anymore.

>Ok now how do you trigger that job from a smart contract?
I didn't say anything about smart contracts. Yes, if you need to trigger it from a smart contract, you would need some solution, be it link or iExec. But ask yourself, apart from the oracle functionality, which is already provided by link, why would you need to trigger large computations from a smart contract ? I don't see any large scale usecase

> Now I need to run my own sgx hardware and I'm responsible for its maintenance and upgrades.
No, you just run on a SGX-enabled cloud. You can literally use AWS and run on SGX to get the results back securely

He literally is.
Okay so you don't understand the need for a decentralized marketplace for cloud computing. Understood. I'll leave you uninformed so you either dyor or don't make it.

>He literally is.
No he isn't.
What he was responding to was this quote by you:
>you can take any Docker container and execute it in an SGX environment, and cryptographically verify that the code/inputs/outputs were not tampered with, and your program was executed correctly. This is live and working today.

This is the basic function of an enclave, for which you obviously do not need iexec, and there is no mention of any "decentralized marketplace".

low life boring shills like you are the worst
fuck off from this board, go shill your bags somewhere else frogs

AWS is not decentralized, retard.

I never said that. I'm saying that he is explaining that you can do that over iExec. Read the last part of that comment he wrote and kill yourself.

You need to work on your reading comprehension. My point was not that iexec invented SGX or negates the need for it... My point is that iexec is the first to enable SGX integration from smart contracts. If you can't understand why that is valuable I'm not going to spoonfeed you.
>I didn't say anything about smart contracts.
The conversation is about smart contract projects. Try to figure out context before joining in next time.
>why would you need to trigger large computations from a smart contract ? I don't see any large scale usecase
Then you lack imagination. Try thinking about it some more... if you can't figure it out in an hour I'll spoonfeed you some use cases.
>No, you just run on a SGX-enabled cloud. You can literally use AWS and run on SGX to get the results back securely
Again we are taking about blockchain and smart contracts here. Try to keep up.
You can't use off-chain computing resources without a bridge like link or rlc. And rlc is currently ahead of link who only have experimental sgx support.

>iexec is the first to enable SGX integration from smart contracts
You do realize Ari Juels of TownCrier co-wrote the Chainlink white paper, right?

This conversation is obviously beyond your skill level. I know that is the benefit of SGX. The point is that iexec brings that functionality to smart contracts.

I'm cringing. This is the type of shit that actually makes me cringe. I feel bad for you, unless you hold some RLC.

>he is explaining that you can do that over iExec.
He's saying you don't need iexec to "take any Docker container and execute it in an SGX environment, and cryptographically verify that the code/inputs/outputs were not tampered with, and your program was executed correctly".

Which is obviously correct.

Troll kys

>The point is that iexec brings that functionality to smart contracts.
That has nothing to do with this:

Yes. And go to github and look at their SGX code. What s the first thing you see on that page? A warning that chainlink does not support SGX and the code is experimental.
I really know what I'm talking about here. Do you think I have not researched chainlink? I'm a node operator dumbass.
If you think I'm wrong, prove it by using link to execute an app in an SGX enclave. You can't, so stfu.

Only If you are literally retarded and somehow missed the fact that we are talking about smart contract execution. But presumably you are not a retard so you realize we are discussing SGX in the context of blockchain and smart contracts.

This guy actually knows his shit. Imagine not listening to us. If iExec is this price for one more week I'm taking out another 10k loan and going all in

>Only If you are literally retarded and somehow missed the fact that we are talking about smart contract execution.
Not here: >A warning that chainlink does not support SGX
Fucking lmao, source right now pls.

I think I learned all I need to about this coin when the dumbass OP forgot to switch his IP lmao.

>The conversation is about smart contract projects. Try to figure out context before joining in next time.
iExec tries to be a general replacement for cloud computing, smart contract based offchain computing is just a tiny, tiny subfraction of that. My comment was directed towards the general usecase.

> if you can't figure it out in an hour I'll spoonfeed you some use cases.
Ok, please spoonfeed me, and give me some examples that aren't a) Oracles (bridging data to the blockchain) or b) some far-out use-cases like smart cities, but something that could be useable today and provides TANGIBLE BENEFITS over the current way. Just to be clear, we are talking about data NEEDED in smart contracts, not just muh decentralized computing.

Samefag using proxies to fud nice one

Yes you dumb fuck. This whole conversation is about iexec... a blockchain project. If I talk about one of their features being SGX support it is obvious to any competent person that we are taking about a blockchain context. You're an idiot.
>Fucking lmao, source right now pls.
Sure, here you go you ignoramus:
github.com/smartcontractkit/chainlink/tree/master/sgx
>NOTE: This is an EXPERIMENTAL optional module that can be loaded into chainlink to do some processing within an attached SGX enclave
You know how I know this? From chatting with Thomas about SGX support.
Now fuck off, stop embarrassing yourself, and try to find a conversation that is more on your level.

Just remember he was copying my posts. And nobody has successfully argued against my points yet.

>This whole conversation is about iexec... a blockchain project
This phrase: "you can take any Docker container and execute it in an SGX environment, and cryptographically verify that the code/inputs/outputs were not tampered with, and your program was executed correctly. This is live and working today."
was put forth as the reason why iexec is "game changing", even though it describes the basic function of an enclave.

That's sad.

>NOTE: This is an EXPERIMENTAL optional module that can be loaded into chainlink to do some processing within an attached SGX enclave
So it doesn't say "Chainlink does not support SGX".
Thanks for conceding you turbotard.

You still have 30 minutes left. Keep thinking about it. You'll get there. I'm about to go into a meeting, if you haven't figured it out by the time I'm back I'll explain. Here's a clue... why is link working on sgx too?

it's all been said before. PoCo is not adequate for an oracle solution, because it was designed for cloud computing. And even at that it's poor.

Attached: fig-Michael-Novogratz-e1532959737653.jpg (1920x1200, 119K)

Can u fucking stop shilling this POS coin? (piece of shit coin)

Bro, your coin is WEIRD! Weird and creepy! I'll just use Amazon or Microsoft for my cloud computing needs tyvm.

If you are so adament about shilling your coin, YOU should do the work Callum, not me.

The market is proving you wrong, don't argue with the market newfag. >Zero substance
Wat? So your shitcoin isn't on a 20 month downtrend? That looks substantial to me!