Can anyone please debunk "iExec is better than LINK in every way" fud? I'm scared bros

Anyone who could argue against or for it and elaborate their stand in a reasonable manner has long disappeared from this board or is just to tired to explain the same points over and over for you brainlets

Sell then

> RLC has the superior oracles.
Do they really though? I need to understand why, anyone here know?

Ok it looks like LINK is about to drop back towards 1$ or 1.50 so I'm gonna get out while I'm ahead and buy some RLC at the bottom since it looks kinda safe.
FUCK IT BROS IM OUT SORRY LINKFRENS BUT I CAN'T BELIEVE THE HYPE ANYMORE

ok we fundamentally dont care if you make or lose money OP

What a retarded shill thread.
> debunk "iExec is better than LINK in every way"
kek. One of them has been outperforming the market by a large margin, while the other has been consistently dumping since two years. RLC is the one that mega-dumped. There, debunked it.

Thanks dude I feel like I made the right choice.

that is just more of a reason to sell link and buy RLC unless you buy high and sell low.
I was looking for more TECHNICAL reasons you fucking dimwit

You're right, my fellow biz dwelling link 4 channer.
Link is most definitely an inferior product to iexec.
You should sell all of your link and filter all link threads and go all in on iexec instead.
I really want to see you succeed.

Who?
>coinmarketcap.com/currencies/rlc/
Why would anyone buy this shitcoin?
>Please buy my bags

this is not a rebuttal to the question! I want to know if anyone can debunk the technology being better

Stop being a pussy and hold link

I need to know the objective truth

Did you see French cars in USA user?
Me too user

You can't handle the truth

Attached: 702131AF-758D-4A8B-9F71-0AC595FE4977.gif (720x720, 1.44M)

At it's core Chainlink has been designed from the ground up to bring real world data on chain in a secure enclave.
This boils down the SDKs provided to integrators the explorer and verification of the data and the Currently deployed nodes that are working to onboard enterprise clients (which there is a huge fucking list of)

IEXEC codebase has been designed from day 1 to run compute jobs and only store the worker information on chain for the payment processing.

The simple answer to your question is that IEXEC bolted on this Oracle functionality to their existing codebase as they are already working on secure enclaves so instead of just storing payment information on chain they store the actual resulted output from the compute job.

It is not all technical user, the core difference in the professional services and development that has been done in direct response to important customers needs for middleware like swift and google.

In summary you are a faggot.

Attached: spepe.jpg (493x709, 141K)

>At it's core Chainlink has been designed from the ground up to bring real world data on chain in a secure enclave.
Isn't LINK not able to currently use SGX? Isn't it experimental?
>The simple answer to your question is that IEXEC bolted on this Oracle functionality to their existing codebase as they are already working on secure enclaves so instead of just storing payment information on chain they store the actual resulted output from the compute job.
Is this true? I read that they had been working on oracles for 2 years in another thread. If oracles were a simple "bolt on", why is chainlinks entire existence trying to solve the oracle problem and iExec did it so easily? This tells me that the oracle problem was actually easy to solve and chainlinks team must be worse than iexec's.

>It is not all technical user
I think this is false because this space is entirely technical. ETH was a technical phenomenon and now we have LINK vs RLC and it feels to me that RLC has a huge tech advantage because of the offchain performance computing thing.

>Retard stinker trying to sound intelligent
iExec was built for trading verifiable computations AND datasets renting since the start, it's on the whitepaper. It happens to be that oracles are a subset of data renting and was an easy integration into the core thanks to PoCo consensus system.

Ok I see what you are doing, you didn't come here for answers you just think you know better than everyone and do not understand why your investment has failed miserably while Stinkers made a bunch of money.

The easiest way for you to grasp your losses would be to look at the money made off of FreeBSD and the money made off of Windows.
Once you understand why one made the richest man in the world while the other is mostly used in Networking devices you will get why your bags keep bleeding.

They are both Operating system user, they have kernels and an easy to use GUI why don't they both have the same market penetration?

Stay cucked faggot.

Attached: a75.png (992x940, 174K)

What? Im asking questions. I only know a little bit about both projects. I saw in another thread that LINK was not SGX capable or something. Am I wrong?

Im on the phone right now,but tomorrow im going to start recording my farts,post it on vocaroo and paste links to it in these kinds of threads. Not only you discord trannies will be tricked into listening to my farts, but after some time you will get addicted to it. 181944 stay hard gang gang

SELL SELL SELL QUICK BEFORE LINK DUMPS
IEXEC ORACLES ARE SUPERIOR AAAAA ITS OVER SELLLLL!!