HONEYCOMB API MARKET LIVE

Unbelievable, you cucks will FUD anything wont you.

How do you gather that? Looking at some of these it's like $5/month for thousands of calls... how is a single call for 25 cents going to be cheaper? At just 20 calls you're already at break even for the monthly sub...

You're talking to Burak, Timo, midhav or one of the other clc fags

>how is a single call for 25 cents going to be cheaper?
Depends on what you need to call. If you're only needing to call a few times a month you go for the .25c option. If you expect to call many times, you go for the monthly rate.

Honeycomb $100k EOY while LINK will have 10000 suicides and pregnant muslim sergeys!!!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH MFW HAHAHAH

Attached: khlpppplmao.jpg (1392x1161, 508K)

Dave and Tokenized are cool though

Who the fuck only issues a call once? Take the weather one for example, what good is a service using the weather where the weather is outdated? You'd need to be issuing calls at least several times a day for your data to remain relevant.

I'm ok with this, not trying to fud but I have only ever been in tech situations where we're making dozens to hundreds or thousands of calls in just a 24 hr period, I can't think of a use case where these prices make sense. Not to say there isn't one, but hoping someone with different experience than mine could shed some light because these prices seem wildly elevated.

based
are we confirmed for sibos yet?

This is what real world adoption looks like.
We fucking made it.

Attached: 1564806541999.png (2083x2083, 610K)

>Link officially lost the first mover advantage, it’s over bros
Honeycomb is using LINK, though?

Love you too Eric

sold everything fuck this

larp

HURRRRRRRR

Attached: sketch-1565125270578.png (1382x1080, 304K)

Checked. Based reverse fudder.

Based non-English understanding user

To be fair it says starting prices. I'm guessing you get a lower price per with more volume.

No one knows what the price "should" be, so I'm guessing things will be all over the place until there's more usage, more marketplaces, and a better idea of what companies want to pay. Sergey already said it's up to the free market to decide all that shit, not CL.

Sure, .25 usd per call,1 per min, per day is 360 bucks. But if it replaces just a single worker bee, with no errors, no breaks, and secure execution/redundancy....starts to be profitable.

All the worker bee office cucks don't understand it's not how much this costs in total, if it saves a dollar a day a person....these jews will have them living on the sidewalk immediately.

Attached: tumblr_pezo941hFU1xefecbo1_640.jpg (600x749, 83K)

A pox on you and your family, Dinesh.

I thought this was vaporware?
Why would Jow Forums lie?

The way I understand it is that the marketplace allows the end user / contract developer to choose the API according to his contract need and then query it through nodes that are connected to honeycomb, so in the end the node operators don't have to plan or negotiate for eventual calls, rather they get directly connected and paid to the premium api the end customer is querying - developer demand and usage precede the operator's querying of the data, it's completely risk less for the operator. Subscribing to a monthly plan without being guaranteed of demand would be a financial risk for obvious reason. But once chainlink actually has regular usage and some API are in regular high demand it would make more sense for the operators to tap into the data source regularly with a paid subscription, pay a little upfront and out of your own pocket, but also maximize profit without the clc middleman. Still I don't think this will be possible for most neet nodes and even most officially listed delegators will probably prefer to rely on an easy option - from what I've gathered, and I've been trying to do my research on this front, most of them are only qualified to provide technical infrastructure for node running, but being savvy about the data market and business development is a whole another level of operation that would also require a biz dev arm to contact providers, negotiate, reaching out to developers to gauge demand, etc. Which is what clc is doing for them. This whole part is why we're so excited about chainlink here, because we realize the scope is far bigger than most realize, but this also means that it's a whole new territory that requires different level of competency, foresight etc. And the truth is that very few people share the long term full picture we have. You have to understand these nodes aren't even primarily focused on link and oracles, most of their current focus is on regular pos delegation etc. They have limited experience and resources.

So is the staking coming soon or not? Others say they haven't even started coding it yet and others that it comes this month, what is it, truth pls.

It's out yesterday

Sorry i got triggered by this and went rogue

you are a scheming jew, avi

Tell meeeeeeeeeeeee AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA JUST FUCKING TEL ME

No one knows retard.

Link is not directly as SIBOS. Just many things relevent to Link are at SIBOS this year.

Okay thanks, I assumed there was some facts that proves one or another

Thanks Eric

top quality kek

...