msdn.microsoft.com
uh guys?
Other urls found in this thread:
msdn.microsoft.com
twitter.com
Ctl f
>Ctrl f
>the poor man's Cmd f
ngmi
we're gonna make it lads
ctrl + f
"Sergey Nazarov"
104 results
Hey guys I didn’t see Chainlink mentioned once. Did I misspell it or something?
Nah ur just a retard
We just keep winning. Should I get a yellow or green lambo?
did read;never sell
Is that the new chainlink logo?
what are we looking for exactly? yeah it's probably chainlink because it's the same oracle rethoric as always without mentioning chainlink or even oracles but?!
>companies will use my shitcoin chain
>they have to, why would they just run their own
>it's open source, of course, but they wouldn't just steal the code
>PARTNERSHIP CONFIRMED
shills absolutely btfo
...
>why would they just run their own
you dont know this yet? how new are you
it's a fucking block which retards have misinterpreted as chainlink at least 500 times now
Used to work on Azure. The Workbench icon hasn’t been around longer than the new Chainlink logo.
Has*
>ctrl + f
>ethereum
>2 matches
BULLISH
what is the autistic explanation for why chainlink is never mentioned by name? is this because you don't use the name of the god protocol in vain?
No reason to mention the middleware when Ethereum is the star of the show.
my know-nothing brainlet explanation would be that the use of Chainlink is somehow implied in what they're talking about
or
chainlink is a scam *dab*
>can't even afford a command key
Pathetic
Chainlink: Hidden in plain sight.
Unironically huge
Sounds like they are just doing their own thing and not using CL in any capacity
'white label'
Yes.. "Microsoft Flow" instead of "cryplets"
>misinterpreted as chainlink
>but it keeps being that ultimately those companies actually are using chainlink
Not to fud but this sounds like their own centralized api system...
>>>/discord/trannies
Oh shit, its the shadowfork !!!
ultimately every company will use chainlink.... it doesn't change the fact that THIS ISN"T FUCKING CHAINLINK YOU NIGGER
1.) it's not important. The whole nature of Chainlink is that it is middleware. Would be kind of like releasing a website and autistically saying "we're using HTML to give you a website!!!"
2.) These companies are real. chainlink was never a PnD. It's unprofessional to manipulate the market, just to mention some middleware nobody really gives a fuck about, it's beside the point in most discussions outside of the blockchain space, just a tool (Again, if someone was offering you a house, they wouldn't repeatedly emphasize "we used DREMEL DRILLS to screw your house together, we're PARTNERED WITH DREMEL", that's autistic)
and 3.)......... they don't want LINK to increase in price before they get theirs lol. This is probably the most moot point, as most professionals even in the blockchain space probably don't invest in every "muh world changing project xD", but it's just basic business sense not to pump the fuck out of the price of untested tech you plan on integrating into your platform. Why not just be quiet and when the people know the people know?
if anyone has any other reasons, let me know. I drank a lot of coffee so this is a bit longer than it needed to be. Shitting and pissing my brains out rn.
literally nothing. again.
>ultimately every company will use chainlink
why is it always the hexagon it just cant be a coincidence anymore
>"we used DREMEL DRILLS to screw your house together, we're PARTNERED WITH DREMEL"
kek
DREMEL $1000 EOY, we're gonna make it brahs
These are literally the exact same examples Sergey has been talking about. This has to be connected to Chainlink.