I'll tell you guys why chainlink will easily be $1000 this december.
The problem with bitcoin is that mining takes too long. Big mining farms use algorithms and programming on ascii computers to constantly mine 50 bitcoins. They also mine dogecoins and fantom etc but thats not the point. Chainlink gets around this via docker images on different mediaplatforms so mining gets easier and u can easily mine 50 bitcoins as a private person. Chainlink also uses programmers to get faster transactions by using fiber instead of regular internet. This will be a huge plus in a more connected world. If you ever used a slow internet u get what i mean.
U seriously think anyone will use a 500GB blockchain when u can just transfer payments via fiber with chainlink? U gotta be stupid not to be all in.
i love it how you took 10 mins of your life to write an incoherent pile of bullshit just to attract some biz brainlets into buying your bags because you use big complicated words for the average bizturd
linkers are non-programmers investing in software projects. They have no clue wether any tech speak is legit or not, hence why they think chainlink is decentralized and partnered with google, when they are not. They're investing in things they don't comprehend.
At this point its so hard to tell who is a link holder fudding for fun who is a 120 iq big boy who genuinely thinks theyre too smart to buy chainlink. Which one are you?
This. At least put some thought into being a fudder if you’re gonna do it
Adam Brown
Based
Easton Peterson
There's a certain sadness behind fud posts these days that is almost upsetting
Logan Perry
Those big ascii computers, has anyone tried mining on a big ebcdic computers?
Jaxon Wood
I thought it was a pretty good shitpost in all honesty, simple folk will be wowed by the big words and start trembling at their impending link value, even though it was quite significantly drool.
>U seriously think anyone will use a 500GB blockchain when u can just transfer payments via fiber with chainlink? U gotta be stupid not to be all in. Quit spreading retarded fucking bullshit user. The fiberbuffer protocol Chainlink uses is not compatible with the innode structure on the latest docker images. IT CANNOT RUN ON THE LATEST VERSION OF THE AWS HYPERVISOR. They are going to lose every partnership they have.
152 here. Got late for the party, but Im holding it for at least 1 year. But really, IQ is over rated on this board and Jow Forums
Joseph Peterson
i eggs plain for brain let's: >be me miner >pay astronomical moniz to but many many expensive compooters to mine bitcoins and shitcoins >pay astronomical electricity bill, because computer consumate alots of electricity, and need cooling so i also pay for cooling, and maintenance because if compooter dies, i have to rebuy new one, and also pay worker that maintain the compooters. >see new chainlink oracle mining go live, chainlink doesn't require expensive compooters, a datawharehouse containing compooters that need to be cooled, and workers >chainlink node is easy to run, just takes a few command lines and you can run the node on amazon WS or google cloud or microsoft azure, or oracle cloud....sure you pay fees to those cloud operators but anyone can do it! you don't need to hire people to maintain your compooters and all, amazon does it for you. also chainlink makes you more mooniz than bitcoin mining >go on binance buy alooooott of chainlink at any price to begin using the network
this, the 120 iq big boy wins at trading, autists get stuck looking at memeline indicators on the 5 minute chart and never zoom out the brainlets think TA doesn't work and believe in mememagic and end up buying tops/bottoms and never selling. the big boy chad analyzes all timeframes and looks at the big picture t.bigboy
When is the last time you checked the github? February? The innode structure for the latest version of docker has been entirely fixed thanks to a simple native golang command (if you check each commit, they added JSON.innodify() ) on everything.
The fucked up thing is that they let this be an issue all throughout 2018 and no one mentioned it here.
You’re still 100% right about the AWS issues. Even more concerning is the fact that they’ve not done a single commit on Hyperledger adapters and they think it’ll just be a simple afterthought like “oh yea, whatever, we’ll figure it out.”
IBM just released an ENORMOUS hyperledger project within the past 48 hours (not to toot my own horn, but I committed a lot of code to it), and even if we wanted to use ChainLink, it’d be like trying to use AOL v2.1 on an iPhone X to stream 5g content.
Check out Hyperledger TYS for more details.
Jackson Sullivan
itt anons be aware op is pushing shit out of his ass
