How does Microsoft's stock keep out-performing despite the generally agreed-upon lameness of its actual products?

my boomer dad had me invest $25,000 for him out of savings in BTC at 8k. /they/ are already catching on.

Boomers did this.

Microsoft Azure (their cloud platform) is huge and gaining market share on AWS. Microsoft shit may not be as popular with consumers but they have always had a lot of traction in the enterprise and still do.

Because they're a monopoly. Who can compete with Microsoft Office, Windows, or even their enterprise software packages?

Monopoly is government granted. The free market has spoken nigger.

Would be good to first understand what Microsoft sells these days.

They've move to subscription based services, and their office suite is the world standard. Not to mention their cloud storage solutions rival those of Amazon's AWS.

You dumb faggots and your little worthless shitcoins are so adorable.
You can join us here once your balls drop and you have some six figure sums to throw around.

Attached: 1420714531268.jpg (640x334, 47K)

Underrated Kek

If you cannot understand why MSFT has been a blue chipper for decades without needing an explanation from one of these retards you will never make it.

boomers speculating that they know what kind of technology would benefit future generations. you know, kinda like blockchain

>Memechain

>Future

Lolno. It's an antiquated, slow, p2p network. Emule is a thing of the past.

this

msft is huge with government and enterprise and their dominance is going nowhere especially because most boomer owned companies dont try new tech until their business is actually dying. Dont even start with government

THIS

fun fact: msft is one of two companies in the world to hold a AAA credit rating

Hmmm this was literally a fun fact, thanks user.

Because it's cheaper to put PCs with Microsoft into offices than a fleet of overpriced Macs.

And even then, they would use Microsoft Office

>Because it's cheaper to put PCs with Microsoft into offices than a fleet of overpriced Macs.

Using Linux would be even cheaper, but everyone has to use Microsoft Office because everyone else uses Microsoft Office.

If the program were to vanish one day, no one would need it.

The numbers are average ages of the group accepting that it's a store of value. Though 80 year olds and CDs is inconsistent with this.

Industry standard

No, it sucks.

Dynamics is god mode for the pricing.

>everyone has to use Microsoft Office
of course, Open Office and Libre Office suck balls
It’s like Photoshop vs GIMP, as soon as you start using GIMP you realize that small actions will take several hours instead of seconds

chainlink partnership[

>t’s like Photoshop vs GIMP, as soon as you start using GIMP you realize that small actions will take several hours instead of seconds

Well, imagine if you paid someone to fix that. Most companies pay more for MS office then it would take to develop their own software. The exception being China, where Bill Gates openly said he'd rather let them "steal" microsoft then risk them using open source.

Bear Trap