Chainlink Fud

If you a decade ago thought that social media was the future, you would probably have invested in Myspace.
If you thought that laptops where the future, you would probably have invested in one of the several companies that are now bankrupt.
Recognizing smart contracts as the "future" does not mean investing in chainlink is the future. Companies that do not existed to day, or that does not work with smarcontracts today, are most likely gonna dominate the smartcontract space in the future - very rarely is it the first in the space that ends up dominating the space.

There are a couple of reasons why Chainlink is most likely gonna fail, for starters the usage of their own token is weird, they could just use a stable coin to pay for the service.
Secondly the tech behind their oracle service is fairly simple to replicate, meaning any random actor could make their own decentralized oracle service fairly quickly. What prevents a more reputable actor, like Microsoft or Google to be that actor, in particular because they themselves have a lot of data and would automatically outcompete chainlink or others if they only want to have their data run through their "own" oracles..

Attached: 1507309255224.png (278x276, 40K)

Didn’t read

dr;ns faggot

Fuck off nigger faggot

Wtf anons OP is right... no one has ever thought of anything like this before or pointed it out... OP are you a literal genius?

dr ns

DIDNT READ... DONT CARE... JUST BUY MORE...

dr;ns

Linkies wont make a real argument

dr;ns
Sage