ORACLE x QUANT

Only Quantlets will make it

Attached: Screenshot_20190816_144338.jpg (1080x1313, 328K)

Other urls found in this thread:

mobile.twitter.com/Crypto___Oracle/status/1162420890572865537
twitter.com/AnonBabble

1k Quantlet here

wait so is quant one of the 50 startups using chainlink or what

All that thanks to chainlink

>Oracle startup
Tfw when quant uses link

>60k sats
Still quamfy? you dumb pajeets?
GTFO

ding ding sing ding
but one of the shitty start ups, else they wouldn't tweet about it and break the NDA, which will kick them out of the funding and program. Stupid pajeets, they really cannot not shill, even if it means they lose all

>Tfw when quant uses link
Tfw everything will use LINK

Bullish for $LINK

Attached: Untitled.jpg (255x242, 36K)

Info on that? Cant find any correlation between Quant and the shitcoin

If quant want to be relevant it needs to be able to connect to legacy systems. Nobody will build a company around quant or will rebuild all work processes on quant. If you expect that, you are more delusional than vechinks.

LINK is currently the only relevant project in the permissionless DLT environment as it is the only way permissionless DLT will have a extremely little shot to have any relevancy in the next 5 years

Wow guess link will be there too now im numb from edging frens

Attached: 27FE4F5FBB6E46D6A6B00BF6858A4F5F.jpg (480x480, 28K)

But Overledger already connects to all networks including legacy systems through their product Overledger? Why would they need Link when they do it even better

KEK Quant admits to being LINKs bitch, bragging about it, doesn’t even bother to mention LINK.

What a coattails riding little slut.

Attached: 92DDBFEC-7EFC-4C03-A78E-089EF7669741.jpg (830x738, 42K)

t. Bullshit link shill as usual
I asked for info not link shilling

Kek, no it doesn't. The goal is to connect to multiple blockchains. Doesn't include links to lets say some api for a random database. On top of that, the product is till now just promises, no working product. Seems like they bend the knee to LINK as the only working solution to their future product

>On top of that, the product is till now just promises, no working product.
But isn't that Chainlink?
The biggest bank network in Europe, SiaGroup, uses Quant's Overledger

>it's a "linkies don't understand what Quant is or does" episode

>t.vechain

>t. MOABtoken

Holy shit someone's desperate.

quantniggers are the cringiest race on earth

I don't see the issue. If ponzi schemes have access to external data they can build funnier ponzis

You know absolutely nothing about Quant. One of the main USPs of Overledger from day once is it allows for seamless connection of legacy systems to blockchain. Enterprises plug their existing systems in, and Quant is the interface that allows communication with a web of interconnected blockchains.

Do you see the desperation in Gilbert? There is a dip and suddenly he is tweeting and visiting the TG. Gilbert cares more about price and partnerships then about building. All these partnerships don't mean shit. They're just promises to do something in the far future, which is very far, because there doesn't seem to be any building. Has anyone seen the office, or the 2nd office there was supposed to be in the US by now? And still no word from Colin. #wheresColin

This is a scheduled fortnightly AMA. If you want to try and fud at least give yourself a slim chance by researching the basics of what you're talking about.

> All these partnerships don't mean shit

Whatever you think they mean, the fact is they're still far more than what 99.9% of crypto projects have achieved to date.

Holy shit, so this means quant was always just a shell of promises, and they only needed to bend the knee to link in order to follow through and not look like retards. Thx user, sold 100k QNT

>yfw Quant team is just a bunch of Linkies running a scam so they can accumulate more Stinkers for their Link node

please be in london

>Quant is the interface
A glorified GUI. Holy fuck, makes even stinkies with their Json Parser looks good

Like the Credits partnerships? They have the most partnerships ut of everyone. Usually it means calling up a company and agree on something that might happen. Partnerships don't mean shit in crypto 95% of the time. The SIA sounded great. Until you look deeper and deeper, which I did. And really read the article. If they will build something, it is years away. (With a huge IF)

Some tasty FUD around this shitcoin, might pick up a bag. Been eyeing it for a while, think this dip is gonna be a good entry point.

Attached: bizisretarded.jpg (259x194, 9K)

> Really read the article

i.e. View it with a lens that allows it to fit your pre-existing narrative of being obsessed with hating Quant.

Fact is a company that powers the European financial network, handling billions in financial transactions, made a public press release announcing a collaboration with Quant. That immediately shits on 99.9% of partnerships ever announced in the history of crypto.

And then there's the collab with AX, the SEC-registered broker.

And then there's the collab with Crowdz that's partnered with Barclays

And then there's the invitation from Oracle to pitch alongside them at Sibos (offered only to the smallest handful of companies at most, unless you think Oracle have 5 square miles of exhibition space).

And then there's the collab with the Government of Armenia

And then there's the collab with $8bn company HCL Technologies

And then there's the talks with Six the Swiss stock exchange.

You can argue as much as you like about muh IF muh MIGHT and whatever other desperate attempts to cling onto words you like, but the fact is Quant is clearly making moves and gaining market access that 99.9% of crypto projects would only dream of.

I edged but accidentally came this morning

They already linked to APIs

This.
Linkies are some of the most ultracrepidarian faggots on this board but desperate quant bagholders are trying to outdo them by far.

>Some tasty FUD around this shitcoin, might pick up a bag
Excellent dubs sir. While you are down there don't forget to pick up a "bag" of JNT too. The fud is unbelievable!

As much as I hate Quant, it could go parabolic at any moment into the top 20 whether we like it or not.

>bought at $2
>didn't sell at $15
God fucking damn it I was only gone 2 weeks

No problem, already up 6% so I have some cash to spare now. Want a couple linkies? feeling generous towards beggars and faggots today

Holy fuck linkies are retarded
user there's no point, every Quant thread is fudded by one Pajeet and a bunch of linkies who don't actually understand what Quant does

You idiots are always so late...
just listen to me for once my calls are legit

Attached: 40CC9DAC-6207-4ACE-A5AC-9D39E9D35876.png (1440x810, 564K)

mobile.twitter.com/Crypto___Oracle/status/1162420890572865537

What’s our next move fren

Smart move by Quant. Now enterprises don't have to choose between Overledger or Chainlink. By integrating that connector, existing Chainlink users can migrate to Overledger without losing the link oracle, and enterprises interested in Overledger can use it knowing they won't be shut out of using Chainlink too.

I did bro I went all in on MAS. When do i get my money back.

Co-market
Vs.
Co-develop

Imagine buying this armenian shit. Even some smart user figured out overledger doesn't work.

I hope this post is a joke.

If you had more than a single digit IQ you'd know it's not.

Chainlink and Overledger do different things targeted for different uses, but they're the kind of systems where enterprise in particular may be keen to use both simultaneously.

If Overledger is built on allowing seamless interoperability between lots of blockchains, it makes sense to allow interoperability between popular non-blockchain systems too, such as Chainlink.

What proof do we have that Overledger does any of these things?

Attached: 23155645645.jpg (1252x704, 104K)

YOU.

JUST.

WIN.

Attached: 1565716021246.png (400x350, 82K)

What proof do we have that Link does any of the things it claims it does?

I just mean that your "point" is so obvious it's not worth stating.

the thing is, chainlink doesn't need quant but quant needs chainlink

Quant doesn't need Chainlink. Quant has a patent for their own tech.

quant needs to use chainlink's decentralized oracle network, chainlink doesn't need to use shit quant is offering

No it doesn't.

Decentralized oracles are a meme. Do you even understand what you're investing in? All these oracles can do is verify that the data from a centralized source is accurate, but they cannot verify that the data from the centralized source is true.

All I have to do is hack the centralized source and change its output and your oracles are useless.

>the state of quantniggers
link token is also used as collateral for the smart contracts and as payment for the node operators

Oracle startups for literally hundreds of shitcoins

>thisiswhathemeant.avi

you guys needed more proof that oracle accepts money to "partner" with shitcoins and pump them? how much more evidence do you guys need?

So you think Oracle is taking hundreds of projects with them to set up exhibition stands at Sibos?

Why does everyone who fuds seem to be completely devoid of any intelligence.

The oracles aggregate different sources for this reason

MITX is also one

This thread has taught me that linkies have no idea what Link or Quant does, we don't need each other, but it is beneficial for both to work together. Both projects will succeed regardless of the other, god Jow Forums is autistic

What if there's only one source? What if multiple sources are manipulated?

The possibility of truly trustless "real world" data is a myth. Always has been, always will be - on a fundamental level. But only the autistic crypto hippies actually care about that. Real business and enterprise understands that only hybrid centralized/decentralized systems are feasible, and that they can still bring substantial cost and time savings when used correctly.

Thanks just sold 100k.

Bingo! Unless the world is completely ruled by robots, then there's no way to prevent the centralized source from being exploited, tampered with for various interests. And even with robots it will probably impossible to prevent certain biases due to the robots being created by humans and with values that resemble that of humans...

Is it better to decentralize everything and leave the final centralized part to a small number of people to deal with it or is it better to have multiple centralized parties that can prevent the final centralized part from gaining too much power ?

There are questions and questions...

LINK = Gartner Cool Vendor & Oracle Partner = THE TOKEN OF THE CENTURY

Quant = Gartner Cool Vendor & Oracle Partner = SCAM

Haha, I don’t own either but holy shit linktards literally make me laugh my ass off with this shit... I may even buy quant actually because of it

Hahahaha.... i think the Linkmarines have actually gone full retard, no joke.

They really have... it’s like they can’t fathom the fact that if quant is a scam, so is link....

Haha we're not saying that, just that LINK is on a completely different level and trajectory. QNT is a nice option for those who missed LINK though.