Why CHAINLINK is finished

this is the final black pill on LINK. read at your own peril and risk. there's no going back after this:

ok,...

the reason the chainlink team is selling up and exiting now isn't b/c they were scammers all along. quite the opposite. rather, they realized they couldn't solve one aspect of the problem that was crucial to their business model; they couldn't figure out to implement the reputation and penalty system.

they tried though. they teamed up with almost every other project in the space and consulted heavily with academia. but they just couldn't figure it out. and b/c it is a quintessential aspect of the LINK package, it meant the whole project was finished.

and it is. finished. it's over. i am telling you this now b/c of how bad i felt for REQ and AMB holders back in the day. LINK is joining that group - i.e. an honest project that couldn't live up to the hype.

RIP LINK

Attached: 1540218178669.jpg (4160x3120, 2.73M)

Other urls found in this thread:

researchgate.net/publication/304410526_Rep_on_the_block_A_next_generation_reputation_system_based_on_the_blockchain).
forbes.com/sites/shermanlee/2018/08/13/a-decentralized-reputation-system-how-blockchain-can-restore-trust-in-online-markets/#19d8a869481a).
ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8292724).
chainlink.community/coti-chainlink/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

thanks for your input. i actually sold today after realizing this.

DR;NS

Based, although they won't be able to shut it down or the autists will hunt down the team. I fear for what would happen to them.
Instead they'll just make low energy presentations to make people think it's still active while selling their stack along the way to live off of.

Attached: 1555546590519.gif (500x250, 1007K)

>Reputation and penalty system

Why is that hard to solve ?

>deliver good data = good rep, bad data = bad rep
>Penalty given for bad data


Please explain why this is impossible to solve

It is really sad.

Imagine taking the time to type this

didnt read. See you at $12 bucks.

ask sirgay.

obviously, you have no idea of the complexity of the problem. those of us who do, know that the choke point for any "oracle solution" is the reward/penalisation issue. if the team knew how to do it, they'd have done it first. and yet it's the only part of the whole project that they haven't even statred on. someone should ask him on stag etomorrow. watch that fat russian fraud sweat.

>they couldn't figure out to implement the reputation and penalty system.

at least make some effort you retard.

It's sad for the investors, but in a way they bought themselves a cake job for the next several years. At least until all interest in the project is lost and the token goes to 0.

Attached: 1557939022066.jpg (1685x2545, 1.96M)

typos will not save you, frend. i am telling you to get out now b4 LINK becomes the next AMB or REQ. we're close to the point of no return for this project once the truth gets out.

like someone else said, if they believed in LINK they'd be using the $30 mil from the ico to buy more, not sell-off the family farm. think about it. seriously.

thanks user it is good to see others have reached the same conclusion. it was fun while it lasted, made some money at least.

its been a joyous ride comrades

Attached: 1547774140430.jpg (633x905, 103K)

Didn't read, never selling.

Lmao bad fud
Just read the protocol information on the chainlink wiki no problem about penalty and reputation, just solution implemented and tested by the team

Good job I already sold.

>typos will not save you
I didn't reference you making a typo, it's the stupid excuse you made that the penalty and reward contracts are the insurmountable barriers preventing them from making progress. There's literally a dozen of problems that I can think of the top of my head that would present significantly harder challenges for chainlink, but those contracts themselves aren't it. The financing part is flawed too.

the oracle problem itself is essentially one of reputation. every theorist accepts that you can't "solve" the oracle problem in knowing 100% that a given input truly matches the source datum point. and in LINK's case reputation absolutely is the method of making as sure as one can be that inputs are correct. that something so fundamental to the project hasn't been dealt with EVEN AFTER MAINNET LAUNCH is astonishing.

nah, it's over for LINK. believe me or don't, but i will warn as many as can from now until price goes back to 20 cents...

OP, you are such a mongo for trying this weak FUD.

If they had problems with that, they could just team up with REP, as they have a working solution for bc-based reputation management (researchgate.net/publication/304410526_Rep_on_the_block_A_next_generation_reputation_system_based_on_the_blockchain). Or ask ONT and FTM teams (forbes.com/sites/shermanlee/2018/08/13/a-decentralized-reputation-system-how-blockchain-can-restore-trust-in-online-markets/#19d8a869481a). There are even IEEE papers on the subject (ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8292724).

Weak sauce, next!

I think a lot of the smart money got out around the top at $4 after they took an honest look at the team and what they've accomplished. It's just going to bleed from here on out. There is literally nothing major on the hoirzon from here on out.

you're right OP

sad as it is, i was early investor in both REQ and LINK..

I sold REQ all the way down, learnt my lesson and sold LINK after coinbase listing. seems its bleeding out, i hope it does well but the charts don't lie, this is going to bleed out like REQ..

REQ $660,000,000 marketcap last year
today: $8 million

Funny that you mention this, OP, because it was just leaked on an unofficial Discord that Sergey is announcing tonight that they have indeed figured out how to implement the reputation and penalty system.

>leaked on an unofficial Discord
o boy

My claim is as real as your's, OP.

Chain Link team doesn't need to work on the reputation system, hence why it hasn't been worked on.

They just let the work be done by a second party (COTI)
chainlink.community/coti-chainlink/

>they teamed up with almost every other project in the space and consulted heavily with academia
exactly, i already said this above. and the news is in that it cant be done, hence the sell-off of the 650mil reserve tokens.

based
are the fudders even trying anymore?

Do you think hiring, acquiring, and running a company out of San Francisco is free? Oh that's right, we're on biz and nobody here has ever owned a business or even had a real job.

And we should believe you, why?

>they'd be using the $30 mil from the ico to buy more
holy shit you're such a fucking idiot

Do you honestly think that anyone here believes a cocksucking little faggot like you?

Kek you are such a faggot. They wouldn't have gone to web3 if this was the case.

lol @ the cope and hopamine on display

you do know this isnt sirgay's first scam, right?

>tfw iExec does decentralized oracles with staking mechanism and PoCo consensus algo as a sideproject and btfo LINK 32m$ unfinished oracles

Attached: tenor.png (360x346, 142K)

lol @ the FUD and faggotry on display from you.
KYS ASAP.

Never actually looked at the chart for this shitcoin. Holy fuck the team must have made tens of millions from this P&D.

I miss good FUD like this. Bravo!
Thanks for what may be the last good link fud.

Attached: 480b6216b16fb1a21acc318c3d805f53 (1).jpg (400x300, 29K)

A real business makes money for operations. Chainlink only makes money from selling tokens like Ripple does. Chainlink clearly doesn’t have any demand.

It’s not about ‘beleif’. The facts are in front of us all. Nobody is utilising Chainlink because the system doesn’t exist. Chainlink are selling tokens to make money. These are facts. You cannot pirouette around this you dumb financial cuck. Having to make up defence stories for your ERC coin ‘investment’ is a sell signal. A bunch of 20-somethings claiming they changed the tech world ala Theranos is a sell signal. A company using cringey memes from an anime forum is a sell signal. Giving yourself military ranks for how many bags you hold is a cringey sell signal. Sixty-five percent of tokens in the pockets of the founders is a don’t-even-buy-this signal.

Linkfags are the dumbest people in crypto. None of them even understand how blockchain works.

You went from they tried and good honest project to they haven't even started and abusing, weak weak fud user, it's ok this is still a good price, stop fighting it

you misread me, or i wasnt clear enough; the team were honest in wanting to solve the problem, did everything they could do, but realized that the one thing beyond them was the reputation & staking system. and without that you have no network. so now there're selling off the portion of the company they own, and taking what they can.

there is simply no doubt that they are selling off now. sometimes it's easier to get away with something if you do it in plain sight.

OP is one pathetic loser that is so desperate to get anons to sell that he white knight larping to get anons to sell their bags but everyone sees through his shenanigans. Get a life, have sex, and kys. You will never get my linkies

The truth. Thanks OP I finally sold

Crypto crap is such a fucking joke

>so desperate to get anons to sell that he white knight larping to get anons to sell their bags
>white knight larping

Rajesh, don’t use words that you don’t know the meaning of please. You’re going to get Rory angry and get yourself fired.

There's more trannies in here than the San Francisco pride parade

Oh shit thanks for the insight, sold 1million links

Just bought another 20 link because of this thread

i seem to have really hit a nerve with this post. like they say, you only take fire when you're over the target...

I just sold my stack, I hold during 2 years thank you for your revelation

pro tip: buy elrond. thank me later from your penthouse apartment.

didnt read not selling

didnt read, not fucking selling

Volume 18M Marketcap 21M
It looks like a totally scam with wash trading isn’t it ?

maybe? but who cares when you can x3 in a couple of days

TELE, on the other hand, is built on both Dash and PivX, pushing their innovations even further into a peer-to-peer network to create a hybrid privacy coin based on a Proof-of-Stake protocol with masternode capabilities. This combination of features is unique among privacy coins

Embarrassing thread op

So who is buying you faggot

Attached: 1565216956609.jpg (800x795, 185K)

>i am telling you this now b/c of how bad i felt for REQ and AMB holders back in the day

Oh fuck, as a REQt survivor of the 2018 holocaust, I hope you are LARPing.

Attached: 1556273108906.jpg (697x534, 193K)

>REQ and AMB
>honest project
Nice try but you got greedy. Happens to the best of us.
Better luck next time kid

>Oh fuck, as a REQt survivor
did you get out in time?

You made me thinking if I were you, I was trying to fud so fuck off

Agree, just bought some

pee poo pee poo
pee poo pee poo
pee poo pee poo

Attached: 1558825729826.png (750x1189, 142K)

DR:NS

Amoveo is coming for the rescue. No problemo

Yawn not selling fckn pussy ass bitch

TRA-LA-LA

Attached: ECVlt4YXUAAWhSy.jpg (1080x1623, 228K)