Same thing you do when a Bitcoin node lies: you verify with one or more other independent oracles/nodes.
It's called decentralization.
Timo is one of us
Christopher Cooper
Dylan Reed
Read Sergey's mainnet blogpost you derp.
blog.chain.link
Bentley Green
Piss off onions lord. You are not one of US.
David Jackson
What is the difference between decentralized and distributed?
Jordan Johnson
Yet it's still easily possible if there is incentive, compromising the integrity of the data.
If the oracle can lie it's not an oracle and thus the service can not be an oracle service. I sincerely hope you didn't buy StainStink.
James Cook
Here comes Sybil, which means that when you ask "another independent oracle/node" you're actually asking from the same entity. StainStink has nothing to shield you from this except KYC. This means it's not decentralized, trustless oracle service.
Jonathan Rogers
>StainStink has nothing to shield you from this except KYC.
KYC is a good example, but there are more.
Read the white paper.
>This means it's not decentralized, trustless oracle service.
If Chainlink isn't that, then what is?
Or what would be, according to you?
Ryder Ramirez
He is a manlet, that played very dirty, and failed an ICO. fuck him
Parker Reyes
I know you are just fudding and having fun, it's fine, I've done that too, but seriously, read what TEE are. You can't compromise the data if you don't know what that data is
Matthew Perez
>but there are more.
No there aren't. They are not even doing anything to fix it right now
>If Chainlink isn't that, then what is?
Nothing yet. StainStink isn't, nor will it ever be one. The biggest reason is that Sergay will exit scam it way before they have a chance to actually start solving the problem. That's because he has a track record of exit scamming (NXT). He left the project for dead and created a new one (StainStink) to milk more money about the same concept that he wanted to achieve with NXT.