For all of you that believe Quant is not the standard on interoperability. Tech so juicy its patented and closed source. Dont fud me with the vaporware/no code fud.
if you dont hold a suicide bag you're an idiot. www.reddit.com/r/QuantNetwork/comments/be0miz/quant_network_and_the_rockefeller_family_the_100/
ICX is the interoperability standard. No wait it's AION. Actually it's WAN. Oh no I forgot it's actually ARK. Hmm... now that I think about it, interoperability is just a giant fucking meme and QNT will suffer the same fate as all the garbage above.
Jose White
All of them are blockchains on its own, shifting the problem a level higher.
It is the ONLY company that has been able to solve universal interoperability at scale with any and all systems (incl. future ones) as of today, bringing a massive first mover advantage to them whilst DLTs Proofs of Concept and implementations are booming.
What I like to add is that Overledger does NOT affect, in any way, the “decentralisation” of the underlying chains. Overledger cannot read, affect, or interfere with the traffic as the QNT token is used to encrypt the transactions on the client side before they even reach Overledger. The level of decentralisation therefore equals that of the underlying chains used by the developers. In addition, gateways (more details to follow in H2 2019) will be put in place to maximise the decentralisation of Overledger across the globe and provide the shortest possible path to anyone transacting via Overledger regardless of their geographical location.
Alexander Martin
Jow Forums hates Quant because they're full of faggots who don't understand anything about the finance world and think that absolutely everything has to be open source and decentralized. there's a reason Quant has already made the partnerships it has, but apparently anons are smarter than the millionaires who run the companies Quant is partnered with if you don't have at least 100 as a suicide stack you're actually retarded also inb4 that one pajeet fudder who spends hours a day trying to get people to not buy Quant
Anthony James
this alone says a lot, Quant is as decentralized as the DLT/blockchains used in the multichain app. It's the absolute perfect solution to DLT interoperability. Enterprises have been waiting for this a long time.
Guess who is in the board of directors at Quant? Guy Dietrich.
Guy Dietrich is a Managing Director at Rockefeller Capital Management in New York. He has over 35 years of investment experience and is responsible for advising ultra-high-net-worth clients, family offices, foundations, and endowments. Prior to joining Rockefeller, he led the largest private wealth management practice for Morgan Stanley Smith Barney in the Silicon Valley. He is a graduate of Dartmouth College, was a Fellow at the Harvard University Advanced Leadership Institute, and was on the Advisory Board of the Stanford University Institute for Economic Policy Research.
Quant may become a preferred asset transfer layer, but Chainlink will win the messaging layer
Nathaniel King
and they can co exist just fine
Alexander Jenkins
Yes. Originally Quant seemed to want to do messaging and asset transfer but seems they are coming around the making chainlink the messaging layer and Quant do asset atomic swaps
>buy my token to access apps utilizing other blockchains/networks literal ponzi and it's still not mentioned in the whitepaper, complete afterthought to raise money
Christopher Foster
Securrency partnership confirmed.
Easton Price
Holy shit, “So, we have an exciting technology, that actually allows those ledgers to talk to each other and allows us to issue tokens which have the compiance rules built into them that can move freely across those ledgers. So, what you have then is the opportunity for real universal liquidity.” - Securrency
Gilbert confirmed they use Overledger.
Anthony Baker
Then what the fuck are you doing here? Do we look like enterprises to you? Imagine being so fucking dumb you think institutions will buy your bags. Fucking idiots on this board.
Sebastian Cox
Quant has no real partners that use their product, stop lying. scam scam scam
Mason James
imagine STILL holding a flavor of the month pnd
Easton Young
>Quant do asset atomic swaps
sergey said at web3 that they are working on adding that to link. take one guess what will get used - open source permissonless chainlink or closed source permissioned quant?
i'll give you a hint since you're clearly a mouthbreathing quant bagholder - chainlink. devs will use chainlink.
Ryan Powell
Dude qnt is a scam lol gj losing money
Landon Davis
The only thing worse than Quanties is seething stinkies, both will fail and go to zero
David Bailey
hilarious fud. has chainlink spoken technically of their asset layer? untill then empty promises. besides quant holds patents and is compliant to every regulatory factor. all i hear is scam, no constructive criticism. are you still accumulating?
Julian Richardson
>guess what people are gonna use, the product that's already working and being implemented by companies or the product that Sergey said they're still working on and isn't complete yet
hmmmm
Nolan Williams
2-3 years.
Julian Barnes
You literally know nothing about Quant lmao. Stop trying to infiltrate QNT, you stinky linker.
Hunter Scott
It's in the business paper and the separate Utility paper. But nice try
Except none of them could even connect permissionless chains, let alone permissioned.
This is the key differentiator between Quant and all these other meme crypto projects. They have a target on enterprise, and enterprise are using permissioned chains like Corda, Fabric etc.
Shown by the partnership with SIA, the largest Euro financial infrastructure provider, who wants interoperability between their fabric, corda and private Eth nets.
Carson Baker
800 institutional traders.
Andrew Green
see you all at $1k minimum
Daniel Diaz
we dont need ur money, enterprises are gonna buy the shit out of this. we just wanted to share this with yall so you dont stay basement dwellers. are you smart money or sheep