WHAT DO WE FUCKING DO

WHAT DO WE FUCKING DO

Attached: 0C926457-5EFB-4B08-9A64-E78E2B100B34.png (1898x2160, 837K)

Other urls found in this thread:

reuters.com/article/us-amazon-bezos-stake/jeff-bezos-sells-amazon-stock-worth-28-billion-last-week-idUSKCN1UW07H
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Be patient.

HOLD what else you fucking moonboy? Did you seriously believe this would moon to 1000 in 3 months? Just look at the fucking ETH chart. It's not easy to hold until 1000 and only the most iron of hands will survive all these shakeouts. If you really believe in chainlink and can't handle the fud here then just leave biz for a while.

sell and buy bsv good sir

bleed out as slowly and agonizingly as possible on pathetically low volume due to extreme bot manipulation fuckery

>Link only thing crashing, and crashing real hard
>fuds everywhere
>nothingburger presentations
>no more partnership announcements
I'm getting really scared. Like, really scared

Attached: 1.jpg (791x764, 85K)

meme it.

We hit lower than this only a few weeks after ATH. Calm down sissy boy

why didn't you sell earlier?

Attached: yrstgfnbrf.jpg (1241x1200, 965K)

>moonboy
stop using pajeet telegram terms nulinker

It’s over...sell now

Hold with Iron hands. We will meet at the citadel my friend, my fellow marine.

Just hold bro, trust me

Attached: cordaswiftsettler.gif (2852x1378, 740K)

SCREAM

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>he still hasn't sold

Attached: 1502586025115.jpg (480x336, 17K)

haha er20 token

>t. SENT holder

2.12, damn. Why do you hodl this shit?

Fuuucckkk I'm not selling but damn it's getting harder & harder to shrug off regret at not cashing in even a little at 4.50, hold me bros

Attached: 1554854056830.jpg (367x401, 108K)

SeePump and dump everything now that is low.

don't get them hyped up for nothing. sibos will be another nothingburger yet again.

Also this, on LINK/ETH we're honestly right in the middle of the same +/-10% range that we've been crabbing in since the beginning of July.

Desperate fudsters keep trying to characterize every -2% drop as a new low, then LINK pumps 2% and they go into hiding, then it goes -2% again and they're back out calling it a new low again. It's honestly just sad at this point.

Anyone remember when Iota pumped from like 50c to almost $5 really quickly LOL

Seems awfully familiar doesn't it?

STOP

Genuine question: why should Chainlink do anything besides pic related?

Iota pumped for all the exact same reasons: big name partnerships, promise to REVOLUTIONIZE EVERYTHING, etc.

If you're not taking profits from pumps of a COMPLETELY speculative project that has accomplished nothing, then you deserve to lose all of your money.

It's really gonna suck when September 16 is a huge nothingburger then the price drops back to $1.25 (at that point, I wonder if chainlink starts to fade to obscurity like iota did).

We'll see...

Attached: Iota.png (992x445, 67K)

But its really actually going down now.

Attached: 700000.jpg (1000x1000, 78K)

Wait for the bottom, then buy more

And to anyone who says "DURR THAT WAS THE MIDDLE OF A BULL RUN!"

Iota pumped completely separately from any other project. Very similarly to how Chainlink just did. The pump was started by the release of a bunch of big partnerships (one being microsoft I believe).

If you haven't yet figured out how cryptocurrency works, you should probably walk away from this market and just pray that whatever bags you're holding don't go to 0 over the next 10 years if your actual strategy is "hold and hope"

no it didnt you absolute newfag

Not really, LINK/ETH is the only pairing that matters so far as listening to or ignoring FUD is concerned. It's just a plain fucking fact that LINK is basically unchanged in vits going on 2 months now. We're still 10% up from the brief USD low we saw a month ago and still dead center in the channel we've been treading on LINK/ETH going on 2 months.

It's literally, actually, totally, completely and utterly not dumping at all. If we fall below .0095 ETH I could start to be convinced we're actually in a downtrend. That would be $1.80 at the current price of ETH.

>didn’t sell the top
>still hasn’t sold
>will hold to 90% down like 99.9% of the clowns in this market

Genuine answer: I have on my hard drive 30 pages of emails where the lead Iota dev (who has since been fired after publicly trying to dox all the r/cc mods) has a childish insult-filled argument with a group of MIT researchers who found an exploit in their shitty amateur (and later retired) cryptography. You will never find any thinking like that from Sergey's project. I have never seen a single negative comment about them from anyone apart from people who clearly haven't even read their WP.

LINKTARDS ON SUICIDE WATCH LOOOOL GET FUCKING DUMPED ON

>It didn't pump in the middle of a bull run

Your own fucking chart literally shows it pumping in late December '17. Yeah it was like two weeks before most altcoins reached their peak but still quite clearly in the euphoria bubble phase of the last bull run. What the fuck are you smoking to think IOTA mooned independently of the rest of the market?

Chainlink literally slow-mooned from $0.30 to $4.00 during a nuclear winter of a bear market when most altcoins lost 90% of more of their USD and sat values. It is legitimately different.

Yes it did. I bought Iota in summer of 2017 for 20c and sold it at $2 in the middle of the pump in early december.

Just wait. Eventually you'll be glad you didnt sell anything at 4.50.

>I bought it for cheap before the crypto bull party in Fall/Winter 2017
>Then I sold it in December 2017 when everything was mooning

What if BTC never broke 5k or ETH $200 that winter, do you think IOTA would still have cracked $1.00? You have to be a 3IQ spud-for-brains to think IOTA's big rise didn't have anything to do with the rest of the market being hyper-bullish at the time.

interadasting...

why is link/eth the only pairing that matters? i hadn't looked at it in a while and you're right, it looks really good

This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team

GUESS WHAT YOU FUCKING MORONS, IF THE CREATOR OF YOUR CRYPTO FUCKING SELLS EVERYTHING AND RUNS, THAT MEANS YOU DO TOO. Fucking duh! How the fuck do any of you morons have hope when THE DEVELOPER ditched your asses! It WILL NOT get better. IT WILL NOT.

Go back in time and buy under 20 cents like everyone with a brain did.

You've been here since 2017 and you still don't know the USD value of a shitcoin is calculated. Just kys.

unironically this.

It's not the only pairing that matters, but for evaluating FUD claims of infinite dumping it is the only pairing worth looking at because it will show you LINK's performance relative to the alt market at large. So of course LINK price has deflated from $4.00 down to $2.25 or so, but you can see most of that action is just altcoins in general turtling up in response to BTC tantrums. LINK has fared no worse than ETH or most other alts in that regard.

Basically if there was a downtrend since July on the LINK/ETH pairing, an argument could be made that there is some unique sell pressure on LINK, whether that's natural correction from ATH or devs dumping mercilessly on the open market, or whatever. Absent that evidence, all 'price going down' FUD can be dismissed out of hand.

Literally and I mean LITERALLY it didn't start crashing until I bought this.

I'm going to buy more though and wait for it do go at like 2.40ish and sell then

That's not really relevant to the speculative price movement of either asset. My point is: if Google and Oracle announcements coupled with being added to the biggest fiat on-ramp for cryptocurrency can only push Chainlink to $4.50, it seems pretty unlikely that speculation alone and "partnership announcements" will push it much higher. And value from actual utility is years away.

This is what I'm doing except I'm buying more now as maybe it is the bottom

Remember when XVG was the scam coin that everybody was in denial about missing the ATH? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

Let me put it another way. If you'd sold all your LINK on July 6 for ETH and bought it all back today on the same pairing, YOU'D HAVE LESS LINK THAN BEFORE. Even just a few days after the new ATH, the LINK/ETH price was lower than it is now.

Anyone who feels we're in some sort of infinite dumping downtrend can't read charts and is liable to hurt themselves falling for FUD.

If you're losing on paper then just hodl, otherwise sell ur holdings.

Yes...iota went on a +/- 2 day run for the exact same reason Chainlink did. It had nothing to do with the overall market sentiment and it's announcement was triggered by the release of a bunch of partnerships. It was the only coin pumping on binance, and was the only project anyone was really talking about for that week or so. If you can't see all the similarities to Chainlink's recent run, then I'm sorry. You can keep hoping that September 16 is going to bring you back to your ATH and I hope it works out for you (I hold chainlink too), but I also wasn't dumb enough to hold my entire bag after that huge pump over $4.

Who the fuck cares about how many ethereum tokens you can get for Chainlink? Ethereum is another shit project that has yet to accomplish anything also. If you're holding Chainlink in the hopes that you can get more Ethereum tokens, you should reconsider your strategy.

IOTA was literally hyped 24/7 on reddit. Go on Reddit and see how many Chainlink mentions there are. As far as IOTAs development was during the moon time, there were literally 0 new things. Meanwhile Chainlink announced mainnet, deployed mainnet, google article, oracle 50 startups announced, Coinbase, new node operators, Linkpool marketplace, all this while not hyping it up with 5 posts a day. Meanwhile, IOTA devs were saying shit like "WE ARE TRYING TO BE ANTI HYPE!! DONT LISTEN TO FUDDERS THERE IS SO MUCH FUD AGAINST OUR PROJECT!". The only thing similar is the classic "hype/correction" cycle, but since IOTA is a borderline scam, it faded away into obscurity.

Ethereum is so shit that almost every token that is shilled on here including Chainlink, is an erc20 token. Gtfo with that statement. Ethereum is being built slowly but surely every year until in a few years from now, it will back the decentralized global economic system every country will adopt. The boomer tech is dying and the zoomer tech is growing. Now link $1000 per token? Never.

>It had nothing to do with the overall market sentiment

Pure fucking delusion. It released all its hype news at a time when millions of newly minted moonbois were trawling Binance looking for the next pump and dump to market buy for quick returns. You want to tell me if the same news had been released in December 2018 that the price would have jumped +800%? Nobody was buying shit then, retail money was fleeing for its life after getting -95% rekt in 2018. It would have been mathematically impossible to pump the price the way we saw it go in 2017.

Ultimately we're going to go around in circles and not convince each other of anything since there's no way of knowing for sure unless we peer into an alternate timeline when IOTA news was released in December 2018. But fuck, man. Nothing happens in isolation like that. I'm even willing to admit much of LINK's rise from $1.00 to $4.00 was on account of the BTC mini-bubble from $9k to $13k happening at the same time and retail money jumping off the top of that dildo and once again looking for promising alts to flip. Without that we might not have cracked $2.00, who knows. But over the course of 2018/early 2019, LINK DID survive the bear market in a way that was unique among altcoins. Whereas IOTA's chart looks indistinguishable from any other shitcoin when zoomed out to weekly candles or larger.

Links price correlates to BTC soiboi

Attached: chainlinko.png (1051x1006, 88K)

You need to learn to trade in a vacuum.

You're basing your strategy on a lot of irrelevant information.

I guess my overall point was that it's not very smart to just buy and hold an entirely speculative asset. You can make a lot of money by trading it.

I realized over $100k profit off of chainlink by selling it around $4 (in less than a year). I've done the same thing with several other cryptocurrencies (including iota). I plan on buying back into Chainlink eventually, but the point is the same: none of these cryptocurrencies just keep going up. It's really easy to see how so many of them behave the exact same way, so I'm just curious as to why people think there is something special about Chainlink? Why would Chainlink go to $1000 and just stay there? It won't. Every time it pumps, there will be a chance to take profit and re-enter.

>link dumps when btc pumps
>"link has decoupled from btc, it will pump when btc dumps"
>link dumps when btc dumps
>"link is correlated with btc, it will pump when btc pumps"
the absolute state of schizo linkies

>Every time it pumps, there will be a chance to take profit and re-enter.

The very definition of why people invest in crypto. To ride the hype of a project and pump their bags so they can cash back out to actual money(even though fiat technically isn't backed by something like real money aka gold, it is current global reserve currency). Link is another project that aims to create a product. Why trust anything other than PoW mined currencies? There's no need for a thousand tokens. I'd say about 20-30 tokens make sense.

I've taken my profits and put a good deal of it into real estate and I've diversified, but this one thing I don't understand about linkies:

Sure, it's a great project, but how do these people expect to get rich overnight holding it? You can actually get pretty rich relatively quickly trading cryptos. No one got rich quickly by holding cryptos. It always took years for anyone who did...but you can make 50% profit AT LEAST every quarter without fail (i.e. you should be able to pretty easily turn $10k into $50k in a year...and if you're set up with trades like how Chainlink has performed, you can make even more).

Linkies that want to get rich overnight haven't realized that the market's main goal is to transfer wealth from the many to the few.

here's the btc correlation faggot

Attached: Screenshot 2019-08-25 at 19.27.59.png (1012x1026, 100K)

Mind if I ask: what is your profession? (generally speaking)

Vitalik sells part of his ETH stack in single USD digit area. ETH still manages to go to $1400. Serg sells part of his LINK stack in single USD digit area. LINK manages to ....

buy more

Shut up idiot. You made some dumb point about IOTA and stink being the same. I dismantled that point and now you're giving it "uh y-yeah well it's all speculative".

Because we are dealing with something different than a pump and dump shittoken with a team that shills and posts pictures with Coinbase t shirts. $1k eoy won't happen of course since Chainlink's adoption mainly relies on overall smartcontract adoption which will take 2 years at least(can't exactly remember the Gartner report detailing this stuff). As far as speculation goes, just by looking at top 15 projects, I can't see why LINK couldn't be on there even at its current point, but that's not how the markets work.

As far as trading goes, I don't really want to trade at all since I only got 20k LINK and I'm afraid of some sudden event that will fuck me over. I'm only 19 as well, so even if it's only 5x in 2 years, it will still be a lot of money for me. I'm just starting uni so having the stress of trading will make shit harder. Of course in hindsight I could have analysed the sentiment and sold at least 10% of my LINK stack, but shit happened so fast and then of course Sergey started doing 700k transactions. Also I'm quite deluded. I've watched every Sergey's talk and I just feel like this is the project. Complete delusion I know.

Attached: lenki.png (543x443, 55K)

>you can make 50% profit AT LEAST every quarter without fail trading
>no one got rich holding crypto
Holy fuck this guy is negative IQ

>Linkies that want to get rich overnight haven't realized that the market's main goal is to transfer wealth from the many to the few.
and your strategy is to basically assume that you will end up being one of those few

You faggots really believed it was the singularity and muh 1000$. Sit down and take a dose of reallity. LINK has made a bunch of people rich that sold at +4$ (me included). Its going to bleed up from here until whales decide it's cheap to buy again, and that number is sub 0.8$. Sell now or get rekt fags

no, you literally never will, cause if you sold at 4.50 and bought at 2.15 you would have more than doubled your stack

It is relative to a non-speculative future.

>all these nu-linkers who bought at $4:00 getting btfo

You had TWO years, faggot. Most of us bought in at .50 cents.

Attached: 2398.gif (400x383, 1.31M)

So we're gonna plunge to like $1.80 soon right and then we'll recover to about $1.95 and then proceed to hover around there breaking $2 now and then in the same way Bitcoin is toying with $10k

that's my prediction

not convinced it will go below $2, too much fud, not enough complacency

I sold at 2.16 and will buy back at the bottom

go back in time and sell at $4

Lmao, you guys just got flipped by fucking IOTA

Honestly it would stink if it started hovering there since I had bought at 2.19 thinking it was going to continue doing what it was before (2.2ish-2.31ish at the lowest and goes up to 2.4-2.5ish usd).

Stop being retarded, nobody's buying your retardation.
reuters.com/article/us-amazon-bezos-stake/jeff-bezos-sells-amazon-stock-worth-28-billion-last-week-idUSKCN1UW07H

Be greedy when others are fearful
Be fearful when others are greedy

Still time to switch to quant (qnt). But not for long.

you seem pretty based. best of luck to you marine

Hodl

>just hold req
>or neo
>or digi
>or bitbean
>or iota
>or bat
>or omg
>or LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINKKKKKKKKKK COOOOOONNNNNNNNNNECCCCCCCCCCCCCTTTTTTTTTT

On a long enough time line all these coins go to zero or returns so negative they may as well be zero

I’m gonna miss everybody!!