I see the same problem with a lot projects. Actually, a lot of tech.
What IS the difference?
Why is Ethereum so widely used then other smartcontract platforms? Why will Chainlink be the most widely used oracle network if not the ONLY oracle network to be used.
Because its not always about the tech, only. If it was about the tech then every ETH clone, BTC clone and copy cat would have equal market cap as ETH and BTC. But its not. cause its not about the tech. Hell I could clone ETH tonight so could you.
Its about the customers. Its about the business relationships one can forge. and sometimes being the first. However, if you are the first it has to work flawlessly or close to it otherwise you will be the first through the wall with a broken nose and another will take over.
Sergey create smartcontract.com in 2013. He's been pushing the oracle network for 5 years. Not just building it but creating a customer base. SWIFT, Web3, Accord, Zepplen, OpenLaw, all of them and we are now just seeing the fruits of 5 years of hard work. Google has integrated Chainlink tech, Oracle is, many smartcontract platforms are as well. Almost 1 a day there is an announcement.
The question shouldn't be why one marketcap or an oracle project is bigger then the rest. The question is why is there a bigger market project in front of Chainlink.
Bitcoin, I can understand. Ethereum, for now, I can understand. But from #3 all the way to #16. Chainlink customer base is bigger and better then any project up until #3 . More reputable clients, Partnerships everyday, transactions growing daily, Most profitable investment of 2018 and 2019 of crypto, all of it.
Want to know why Chainlink is not at $100 yet? Because LINK is just starting its bull run. Look at that picture posted at the start of this thread. 57,000 wallets holding LINK. That is nothing. NOTHING. Every other project is in the millions if not tens of millions of wallets holding their weak ass crypto.