Lmao, Rory actually responded to my email about the series of 700k dumps.
Pic attached.
Lmao, Rory actually responded to my email about the series of 700k dumps.
Pic attached.
Exit scam at 90%
>share dilution
>he actually thinks that an ECR-20 token represents a share in a company
Jesus Christ you fucking retards.
>Investor
Do you have any fucking idea how cringe that is?
Brother Ruslam Magomedov
Well there goes “Muh node theory”
Stinklets on suicide watch
REST IN SHIT FAGGOTS LMAOOOOOOOOO
GOD THIS FEELS SO GOOD!!!
OH NO NO NO
LOOK A THIS DUDE
DEVS ARE DUMPING ON HIM
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>OH NO NO NO
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
forget link, coti is the future
LMAOOO TOTALLY COMPARABLE BRO, NOT LMAOOOOOOOOOO WOW IT MUST SUCK TO BE A STINKY RETARD RN HOLU SHIT
Both involve selling company assets to fund operations.
In Bezos' case, it's not even Amazon's operations he's funding, so it's actually worse.
Retards like you are the only thing that worries me about my investment
What does the team know that we don’t. When will new hires be announce ?
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
That's honestly a terrible answer.
What hires on this planet need $1.4MM in salary each? None. That'll pay for 5 years salary for even the most expensive devs, and most of those roles you can hire amazing people for $75-150k, so every 700k is 10 years salary.
Something is INCREDIBLY fishy about this, I care way less they're selling than about the fact that THEY WON'T FUCKING TELL ANYONE WHY. Absolutely zero transparency.
There's more than salaries to pay you dimwit.
>hey bro we still need your money 2 years after the launch
Big fat red flag for any investor
fuck off curry cunt
Well amazon is profitable, it has you know that thing we call "customers"
Oh, so you guys are just cuck charitable donors in Chainlink?
Are you expecting a capital gain?
Then you're a fucking investor. PERIOD.
OH YEA? LIKE WHAT? IT'S AN ENTIRELY REMOTE TEAM THEY WORK FROM HOME. EXPLAIN TO ME WHY THE TEAM NEEDS AN EXTRA $20-50MM ON TOP OF THE $32MM THEY HAVE.
I didn't sell REQ at $1.20
Now I'm feeling the same for not having sold ChainSTINK for $4.00...
its like physically impossible for them to just say "we are selling"...like theyll say everything but that, beating around the bush...this is by far the sketchiest thing theyve done..fuck i should have sold
Its sad people are dumb enough to not even look at the sender email addy
You discord fudfags seriously need to kill yourselves
>He thinks the cash raised from Binance dumps is going to recruit some dipshit Millennial hires.
Amazon isn't decentralized.
>OH YEA? LIKE WHAT?
All of the operating expenses that aren't salaries.
Wow, you're quite the idiot.
Idiots like you making excuses this poor is a major SELL signal for me.
Yea, fucking name them. What? Amazon server costs? Get the fuck out of here. This is WAY WAY WAY WAY more money than their salaries and operating cost needs for the next decade.
>Yea, fucking name them.
You can't think of other fintech operating expenses other than salaries?
Well that figures I guess.
>Amazon isn't decentralized.
No one gives a shit.
You know what matters? Paying customers and cash flow.
Chainstink's only cash flow comes from dumping tokens on NEETs.
>Chainstink's only cash flow comes from dumping tokens on NEETs.
ahem
reuters.com
>You know what matters? Paying customers and cash flow.
That's for the nodes.
Chainlink itself is a decentralized project, so if the Chainlink devs want to have "customers" rather than users, then they'll have to run nodes as well.
lmao typical copy paste scam response
>"fintech"
Apparently neither can you, since you can't name one single operating expense they have that could even come close to justifying these sales.
Get that smugness out of here, it's fucking cringe. You're a moron, happy to get dumped on without the slightest clue about why. Just take it right in the ass and smile.
rusky deyected
> you can't name one single operating expense they have that could even come close to justifying these sales.
Sure I can.
Keep asking me to explain to you that "salaries" aren't the only operating expense a fintech company has, it's making you look good, I promise.
>happy to get dumped on
reuters.com
Rory is probably one of the most well paid jannies on Earth right now.
Doesn't the SEC have some sort of regulation about using your coins to fund yourself?
>falling for Bezos's exit scam
sell your Amazon before it's too late
Amazon is perhaps the most successful ecommerce business in history.
The very fact you're comparing some literally WHO software start-up in a highly questiontable, scam-filled crypto space, SCREAMS of desperation and severe delusion on your end.
Chainstinkers are approaching Request Network levels of delusion and cope.
Go to their sub, and notice that you are literally like them.
> investor
> emissions
ESL detected
>Amazon is perhaps the most successful ecommerce business in history.
Yes, and they "dump" their shit on the holders as well in order to secure funding.
That's my point you dumbass lol.
If you could, you would. I'm done wasting my time with you, you're a fucking brainlet. Meanwhile I operate a tech company that actually does tens of millions in revenue and I could operate this company for at least 20-30 years off of the money Sergey has made from selling. Nobody needs that much runway, especially at a stage where you're not even driving revenue yet.
Here's a life lesson for you, kiddo: Salaries are always the biggest operating cost of any company, which is why when companies want to save money the first thing that happens is a bunch of layoffs.
>PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE explain to me what expenses other than "salaries" fintech companies have!!!
nah
>That's for the nodes.
Wow, you're stupid.
So who is going to be paying the node holders? Where is the money going to come from to support node fees?
You do realize Chainlink is not the US Treasury and cannot just print tokens and expect them to hold value without destroying the token's value with hyper-inflation?
Lmao this post. Can you say cringepill?
>So who is going to be paying the node holders?
Read the white paper lmao.
>chainlink
>expecting a capital gain
lol
>You do realize Chainlink is not the US Treasury and cannot just print tokens and expect them to hold value without destroying the token's value with hyper-inflation?
Chainlink isn't printing more tokens.
The fuck are you talking about.
because you're a low IQ linker who can't
>Read the white paper lmao.
More like toilet paper for the loo
>Salaries are always the biggest operating cost of any company
>More like toilet paper
More like peepee poopoo paper
peepee poopoo DOODOO
*runs away*
This market needs to burn to the ground to get rid of all the brainlets. You're not an investor in a company like stocks.
this guy gets it
Why are you talking about Amazon again?
There's no parallels between your gambling shitcoins and the most disruptive retailer in history.
get rekt op
yea because rory's gonna say "we're sending 700k link to each of our NDA partners" what did you expect
So you are literally so dim that you can't even justify your shitcoin bags?
The absolute state of crypto-kiddies.
Grow up. Buy a real business instead.
>MUH NDAs
>MUH SOON
Jesus, this shitcoin is on its last legs if we're at the "SOON" and "NDA" cycle.
Just look at VeChink and Ambrosus to see how that went.
Holy fuck, you people are feeding me all these sell signals. I might be tempted to sell the rest of this trash now. I've got 45,000 STINK remaining.
He had to pay off his ex wife.
He should've told you to kill yourself but he had to keep it professional
dr;ns
Lol no you don't
implying he will announce the hiring of unpaid interns
>he thinks it's decentralized while sergey holds more than 51%
>comparing Amazon stock, a registered NYSE security complying with US laws to some Ethereum tokens printed in some NEET's basement
>comparing selling stocks in a real company to fund another real company to a NEET printing Ethereum tokens in his basement
Stop making this hilarious equivalence, it isn't helping your cause.
LINK tokens aren't an asset. Saying they are means they're a security. If they're a security then they're illegal because they weren't distributed properly.
YOU are not the one who decides if you're an investor or not, the thing you invested in decides. With that logic I just decided your mother is my girlfriend.
>Amazon isn't decentralized.
LMAO what the fuck are you trying to make a point of?
>operating expenses
No jobs, no runs on any NEET nodes. There are no 'operations'.
>Chainlink isn't printing more tokens
They can do whatever they want, its an ERC shitcoin, there are no rules here.
>No jobs, no runs on any NEET nodes. There are no 'operations'.
Read Sergey's blog post.
>Stop making this hilarious equivalence
Both are companies, both sell assets to fund operations.
If Chainlink is a scam for doing so, then so is Amazon.
btw: any company with stocks or other assets sells them to fund operations.
That's literally what they're for.
>There's no parallels between your gambling shitcoins and the most disruptive retailer in history.
Sure there is: both are selling assets to fund operations.
>reddut spacing
>sub
N I G G E R
I
G
G
E
R
>It's an investment, full stop. You bought in the hope of a capital gain.
Nobody gives a shit what you ‘hoped’ for LMAO. It’s not a comapny generating profits, these are not shares of company profits or ownership of the company. They’re some coin that is supposed to pay for jobs. Holy shit you’re dumb. Nobody from Chainlink ever said LINK tokens were an investment. They are not an investment, they are supposed to be a utility token.
>scaling up a startup company doesn’t require capital
Dude there’s so many reasons why they’d need that money. Salary of employees is one reason. Acquisitions is another. Marketing, development, operating costs, this shit costs a lot of money.
Looking at this from the teams perspective, it would be better to have millions in the bank ready to use for any of the above mentioned reasons, rather than operating on a shoestring budget. Creating a world changing technology takes money to do.
The only people that see these 700k transfers as bearish are nulink faggots who bought in above $1. All the real link marines bought in sub $.40 and will patiently wait this out
>Sure there is: both are selling assets to fund operations.
No.
And there's no evidence to support your claim that Chainlink is using all that cash for anything other than hookers and blow.
That's just naive copium.
LINK tokens are unregistered securities. None of the terms relating to actual stocks mean shit here. LINK tokens have the explicit use of solely paying ‘node operators’. Nobody even knows what these are for sure, not even Sir Gay himself.
You cannot believe you got scammed.
Holy shit I thought you were just being a dick but you are actually retarded.
ЛEEEE ЖИECTЬ БPATУХA PУCЛAH БPAT MAГAMEДЯHИH BAЙBAЙBAЙ ДЯДЯ ГBEPЦЭБOХ ЧУБAMEКOB ПEPEДAЁT ПPИBET MЫ C TЁTEЙ БУPЛECК BOЛHУEMCЯ ЗA TBOЙ ИHBИCTИЦИOHHЫЙ ПOPTФEЛЬ
Coti is isreal I scam. Look it up on the internet. Fake partnerships and everything. The guy has a big law suit against him and all the coins he collaborated with are tanking.
I got fucked 50% from because some nigger shill, shilled me this coin. Don’t trust them. They are scamming Jews and want to dump on you.
>they are supposed to be a utility token.
That's an unproven allegation. What utility does Chainstink even have?
Also, what's stopping Sergey from issuing shares to raise money on the OTC pink sheets markets and absolutely BTFOing NEET tokencucks?
Like most ICOs, the tokens were simply a quasi-legal way to get public money, but without any of those nasty legal strings that actual protect investors from fraud and scams.
Well played NEETs, well played indeed.
52 nodes operating right now.
>n-nobody even knows what a node operator is
>Chainlink isn't printing more tokens.
They could tomorrow, there's absolutely NOTHING stopping them from printing out another 2 billion.
And all of them are basically pranks created by trolls.
STay BTFO, go sit in your corner.
>Investing in a digital equivalent of casino chips.
Jow Forums, never change.
He did. she has $37B in shares you idiot.
>the absolute state of nolinker cope
it must suck not being smart enough to both trust your investments and make them at a proper time.
Stop posting, dumb fucking shitskin.
you seem pretty salty, is it because you're just realizing now that the Google partnership was fake and a P&D?
>this shit costs a lot of money.
This
And remember what happened during thedot com burst?
Companies that made it through had sufficient capital beforehand.
This is the sufficient capital being set aside
Oh stinkies :)
Literally everything you said is false retard
I'm going to invest at the blackjack table.
We're degenerate gamblers at worst, parasitic scalpers at best.
Hey Brainlet user, How many times do you have to be told that nodes won't show runs on market.link until they are on mainnet explorer atm?
>being this new
Is now the time to sell my fantom's and buy more link?
No salt, all smug