WHO THE FUCK BELIEVES PAJEET SCAMS

Seriously, who the FUCK is holding BSV and Bitcoin CASH? How the fuck can people be that fucking stupid?!

Attached: 1567238263655.jpg (1920x1080, 161K)

they've been outperforming most of the market though, so....

Vishnu in the blockchain

Lol no they haven't

hold on now I thought BCH was legit

Believe the poo
Believ the poo
Belie the poo
Beli the poo
Bel the poo
Be the poo

look at the charts?
lol?

Seriously. Bitcoin CASH. What the actual fuck?!

And fucking Creg. That fucking spastic windowlicker Aussie. Who the fuck believes a word he has to say? The stupid fucking cunt.

>Calls the only coin on the market a scam that isn't a scam.
>Your thoughts. They are inverted.

Attached: photo_2019-07-19_12-20-57.jpg (1280x528, 49K)

I'm convinced that all BSV shills who aren't pajeets are neurotic homosexuals, same as Creg himself. They see Creg, obviously the most unstable closeted fruit there is, and they see themselves in him, want him to succeed on their behalf.

You know CSW is married, with children right? Even if he was of the homosexual persuasion, he's still seen more pussy and made more offspring than 85% of this neet incel board.

>of the homosexual persuasion

Only a faggot would phrase it like that.

Seriously, who the FUCK is holding LINK and Linkpool tokens? How the fuck can people be that fucking stupid?!

Imagine not having a deity on your blockchain

i do sir, Craig is Sakashi Natomoto legit king of india

Bsv has vishnu
Link has sergey
Only two blockchains have verified deity

Touched a nerve there faggot?

Calm down sugartits, he called Craig a faggot, not you. Also, the most degenerate faggots are married with children and are masking up their fucked up tastes or are still in denial
t. fag

Attached: 1557469268102.jpg (500x507, 64K)

What do you mean a scam? Shit looks legit man, I have 60% of my savings in Bitcoin CASH. It's real right? What the fuck man

The final number I'm interested in is the 500kb limit on block sizes.
According to Wikipedia, Visa alone processed 62 billion transactions
in 2009. Dividing through we get an average of 2000 transactions per
second, so peak rate is probably around double that at 4000
transactions/sec. With a ten minute block target, at peak a block
might need to contain 2.4 million transactions, which just won't fit
into 500kb. Is this 500kb a temporary limitation that will be slowly
removed over time from the official client or something more
fundamental?


A higher limit can be phased in once we have actual use closer to the limit and make sure it's working OK.

Eventually when we have client-only implementations, the block chain size won't matter much. Until then, while all users still have to download the entire block chain to start, it's nice if we can keep it down to a reasonable size.

With very high transaction volume, network nodes would consolidate and there would be more pooled mining and GPU farms, and users would run client-only. With dev work on optimising and parallelising, it can keep scaling up.

Whatever the current capacity of the software is, it automatically grows at the rate of Moore's Law, about 60% per year.

Bitch i got that Bitcoin CASH. Wutchu gunna do?