There are anons RIGHT NOW selling LINK because of entry level fud and hired pajeet fud crew threads. I'm not sure whether to laugh hysterically or cry in empathy to these retards falling for the dumbest 110 IQ fud.
If one of you retards is lurking and reading this thread, understand this. There will NEVER be an opportunity like this at least for the next 20 years. You already made it, all the scenarios that took place in your life have landed you on a Japanese basket weaving forum that is obsessed with a blue cube and its endless possibilities. What remains is your destiny. Will you sit idle and let narcissistic fudders dictate your actions or create your own vision of the future?
The choice is up to you, blue pill or red pill understand this; your life will never be the same again.
there are still deluded stinky linky holding onto this scam
Cameron James
Gas the stinkers. BSV flippening now
Jason Hall
Simple to use, 52 nodes on mainnet and counting, Shilled by Google, Shilled by Oracle Shilled by AWS (kaiko) Worked with Microsoft Still working with SWIFT Acquired Town crier (worked with IBM + Vitalik), Threshold signatures, SGX Tees, enclaves Mixicles Deco Web 3.0 Defi Drivatives
All the “news” you’re referring to is priced in. There’s a reason ChainLink pumped so much from Google, Oracle, Coinbase: only very few people knew about this info before it was released. I won’t be surprised if Link is close to $1 by the end of September. This is all useless hype at this point. Unless some major company says “we’re using mixicles for $100B worth of derivatives contracts” no one cares about this tech shit and it’s all the same reason why ETH is also bleeding to oblivion after its 2017 hype pump.
Blake Bailey
Nice try Pajeet you almost, almost , almost came across white and legit. Fair play to you sir.
Nathan Sanchez
There aren't though. If people were selling we'd see a return to discord pnd spam here. The fact it's still 40 link FUD threads tells us they're still desperate to get people to give up on link.
yeah, most people dont realize this project is not gonna be some "get rich fast" scheme, its gonna take time, buy now, forget about it for 5 years, come back and realize you own as much as the 0.01% of the worlds richest people
Camden Martin
yes, it's so simple to use, they did an amazing job, i literally wrote a simple consumer contract requesting bridges, and was amazed at the simplicity.
Ayden Rodriguez
Anyone who didn't at least skim through the mixicles paper to get a sense of it needs to market sell their link right now.
Samuel Nguyen
github or larp
Brody Sanchez
cool id
Christian Sanchez
Underneath the market LINK continues to dump And the tokens I've bought Have all become my bags And I'm living off of cope And the drippings from Sergey's ass But it's okay to sell LINK 'Cause marines don't have any feelings
Sellwall in the way Ummmmm Sellwall in the way, yeah Ummmmm Sellwall in the way Ummmmm Sellwall in the way Ummmmm
Jackson Thomas
Just curious:
If Ari Juels couldn’t think of any use cases for Ethereum besides criminalware and the creation of investment instruments that don’t currently exist (I.e. “Mixicles” which are used by 0% of the population), why do so many people pretend they can envision so many use cases for ChainLink and Ethereum? This is a genuine question. I hold ChainLink, but the more this goes on, the more it feels like a lot of this is an Enron-like, emperor’s new close situation. Very few “extreme ChainLink bulls” have ever written a simple piece of software or entered into a complex financial contract...yet they’re all of a sudden visionaries in these fields...
Hunter Sullivan
Can someone post the video link where the only two use cases Ari Juels can seem to think of are criminalware and owning pieces of art work? It was an interview with a nerdy black guy...
Adrian Barnes
ddin't read ,not buying
Joshua Price
This is the sort of low quality fud op was talking about.
>“Mixicles” which are used by 0% of the population So to rephrase: >why aren't these smart contract structures that were literally only just conceived in principle and laid out in a document a couple of days ago... why aren't they in use? Gee user, I don't know. You've really opened up a can of Pandora's worms there.
There’s the video. You’re welcome to to research the paper her cites also. It’s pretty funny how Link user memes get 1000 views, and this gets 300 after a long time.
I’m not even fudding, just being entirely objective.
John Rogers
What is the best way to buy LINK right now?
Brody Long
The team dumping tokens after Coinbase launch FUD is not FUD because it's real and has not been addressed in any credible way.
My point was that this is the first iteration of new financial instruments. They now have to innovate several more AND convince the people who actually have money to use these vehicles (and very few people know if they’re even good. Especially the meme posters here).
I guarantee not one person here is planning on using a ChainLink smart Contract for a financial agreement.
Nolan Nguyen
Brainlet alert on isle 5
Noah Turner
I plan on using oracle powered smart contracts to provide housing deposit loans to close friends. They can withdraw from a liquidity pool that I will provide, select repayment terms, and any and all repayments will go directly to nominated charities of their choosing. Defaults won't be punished and I won't care if they can never repay. It's essentially a way to help my friends and give to charity, and let them give to charity, all in one go. Does that qualify as a financial agreement?
Joshua Murphy
You must have missed the recent blog post outlining 20+ immediate use cases. You should lurk more.
>The team dumping tokens after Coinbase launch FUD is not FUD What the fuck are you talking about?
James Nguyen
no one needs to convince them, it's as simple as sergey described it if the competition makes more money, if you don't implement it by tuesday you're all fired.
as simple as that, you can't fight innovation, you either embrace it or die.
Camden Morris
do you have any proof they actually sold? tokens were transferred to binance, but after that no one knows.
Dominic Robinson
wrote the code on remix directly
Dylan Collins
but i'm planning on working on an externala dapter for chainlink this weekend, i'll prolly use Bridges by Linkpool, they simplified everything
Didn't sell because of the fud, i sold because my government os getting ready to ban "hi capacity" magazines for guns, and I had to get me some before I can't anymore pr before they are 10x the price.
>They don't deserve what's about to happen. They gonna lose the rest of they money.
Robert Gomez
This. Nobody wants to be the next blockbuster, but it will happen if they don't adapt
Justin Mitchell
Honestly the reason LINK dipped 30 cents/ crypto fell in general (that nobody is talking about) is people cashing out to poopsock WoW classic, trust me the temptation was strong for me as well.
If I had cashed out I could have quit work for a year + and just played wow like I was fifteen again.
It’s good though, great distraction for my hands makes them busy and easier to hodl.
Yes, it's on the Blockchain moron.Millions of tokens going straight from the developer account right to Binance to be market sold.
Yes market sold, because the ONLY reason one would send millions of tokens to Binance is to have them sold on the market with the lowest costs and greatest liquidity.
Any other theory is hopelessly delusional and implausible unless proven otherwise.
So again, the so-called FUD is not FUD and an alarming signal to any savvy shitcoin speculator who has seen this type of behavior before in various ICO scams.
Isaiah Baker
just market triple-guessed sold 100k, jek
Brayden Ortiz
>Yes, it's on the Blockchain moron.Millions of tokens going straight from the developer account right to Binance to be market sold. Source that they were market sold?
This is the same question asked by the poster you just quoted, btw. Improve your reading comprehension.
Nathaniel White
mind > matter
Jace Wood
>Source that they were market sold?
Binance has no other purpose than market selling.
Your wild conspiracy theory would need actual evidence, my explanation is the most obvious one and therefore the correct one.
No one trusts or uses these alleged services, you would need actual evidence to show that these were moved in large volume to mysterious OTC clients.
Do you have a wallet address that shows movement from one of these OTC wallets to a new account to support your deranged conspiracy theory?
If not proven, we have to only assume the MOST NATURAL and OBVIOUS purpose of moving millions of tokens to Binance. This is also reflected in the charts.
Since the dumps have started, the price has tanked by more than 50%.
Your stupid conspiracy theory is stupid, and rejected until proven otherwise.
>No one trusts or uses these alleged services lmao, if you say so.
>one of these OTC wallets Oh god it's retarded.
Evan Hall
>lmao, if you say so.
You have not shown us anything otherwise.
It's a cute conspiracy theory which is really just a coping mechanism in the absence of any other credible explanation.
Why the fuck you would send millions to a scamming Chink exchange who are being chased by US regulators, to sell your shitcoins for a fee to US customers, is beyond retarded, even for a double-digit IQ stinklet.
The amount of complete idiots, with no brains, is actually embarrassing, because I hold 20K myself. If these idiots own what I own, that means there is something really fucking wrong with my mental capacity and I probably will never make it.
>You have not shown us anything otherwise. Binance offers OTC. Deal with it.
Gabriel Rodriguez
>Binance offers OTC.
That's not a tenable argument for the millions of tokens that were market sold on Binance' retail markets.
Nathaniel Hughes
What?
Thomas Foster
The fact that Binance has an OTC desk (like many other exchanges) has nothing to do with millions of tokens being moved to Binance's hot wallet.
Those tokens were market sold on the retail exchange.
Low IQ translation: they took a steamy dump on you "people".
Bitfinex is the only OTC broker that has any credibility in the Western world.
Dylan Wilson
>The fact that Binance has an OTC desk (like many other exchanges) has nothing to do with millions of tokens being moved to Binance's hot wallet. Of course it does. Everything passes through the hot wallet.
Julian Rodriguez
>emperor's new close Bone apple teeth, pajeet. Go back to your designated street and shit yourself to death.
Jace Clark
I needed this optimism user. >They call me iron hands
Cameron Clark
LINK/ETH pairing does not support this massive market dump conspiracy. LINK has been doing about as poorly as every other alt since July has, +/- 10%.
Henry Watson
>nobody uses iPods says the retard 5 2 days after their existence is announced. Who even are your targets?
James Nelson
>Everything passes through the hot wallet.
Yeah, to be market sold.
Which BTW, was plainly admitted by Rory from the team. Some user wrote them an email and they basically said they were selling off the 30% of their withheld pre-mine to raise cash.'
Shouldn't be a little better informed about your largest gamble in your life?
Those two use cases were his initial understanding upon learning of blockchain tech. He later co-wrote a dozen papers on blockchain tech dedicating thousands of hours and in the same video talked of the actual use cases currently being worked on. You might not be a paid fudder just genuinely retarded.
Adam Clark
They don't need to convince anyone. We already know the interest is there because we see all the big names getting involved in block chain tech, it will take time for them to figure out how they want to use it. Once one company sees the value added and is able to implement it it will be a torrent of adoption. They are merely building the framework right now, average joe won't likely won't be using smartcontracts to run his small time business out the gate. A large company will also not start running behind the scenes with smart contracts overnight. They will implement it into a small portion of their business as a trial run, they will work out kinks until they can expand it. Once they expand it and as other user said, Sergey foretold, one company shows revenue up 15% in a quarter every other company will have implemented it by the following quarter until it becomes required to compete.
James Cox
1 reason to buy in at this price? post your portfolio i bet you have lost atleast 10%
Adrian Gomez
>OTC as well you moron.
No, actually, zero OTC, because no credible institution or company deals with a Chinese ponzi casino "exchange" that launches its own pump and dump scams and is in violation of basically every securities law ever devise.
We're back to your retarded conspiracy theory/coping mechanism.
Here's a tip: if you don't even have a handle on the basics in terms of knowledge of your speculations, you should not be engaged in this. Put your money into something that is easy to understand and with regulator approved financial statements and filings.
Honestly that’s a great question. Sergey and co have been in deep talks with fintech. You can say that the speculation is that they are constantly discussing and implementing CL behind closed doors. Why do you ask ? First mover advantage partnerships, and use cases. Now how far deep that rabbit hole goes/ it’s up to speculation. But there are strong breadcrumbs that anons shredded. Those were fun times. Check the archives if your time fancies.
Caleb Collins
>zero OTC lmao, if you say so.
Binance offers OTC, deal with it.
Brayden Phillips
>lmao, if you say so.
You were unable to show us otherwise, so we all have to assume the most logical answer - ZERO OTC movement.
Angel Martinez
I'm an NYC user been in since day 1 and I recently had to sell a portion of my stack for under $2 because once binance closes I'll be unable to sell my linkies for god knows how long. Goybase fucking me in the ass. Hopefully 40k is still enough to make it.
Ayden Rivera
>You were unable to show us otherwise I don't have to show you shit.
Binance has OTC, end of story.
Colton Harris
No signs of 700k "dumps" impacting prices Everyone with a brain and knew charts was saying sell at 3.80 and buy back in below 2 bucks. I knew we were going to get a pullback. My main blame is BTC fucking everything up this summer
>Rory admits they were sold to raise cash. I love how you say "admits". It was communicated clearly in advance you dipshit. blog.chain.link/growing-chainlink/
Also, "sold" could refer to "sold OTC".
Nathan Smith
>Or they were sold OTC.
Rejected on the grounds of horseshit, unverified, tinfoil nonsense.
>Rejected on the grounds of horseshit, unverified, tinfoil nonsense. Binance has otc, you know.
Adam Russell
>Also, "sold" could refer to "sold OTC".
That doesn't then change the fact they were added to circulating supply and diluted the token price.
They certainly are not being fucking used by node operators, that is certain.
Chase Brown
>Binance has otc, you know.
That statement has nothing to do with the 700K dumps.
Binance is also a participant in issuing its own illegal pump and dump securities and insider trading, among numerous other offenses.
Is that also related to Chainlink?
Sebastian Lee
>That doesn't then change the fact they were added to circulating supply and diluted the token price. That's another matter altogether. Btw, they were never "out" of circulation. Those tokens were never locked up in any way, they just sat in wallets.
>They certainly are not being fucking used by node operators, that is certain. What makes you so certain? Link tokens are constantly being used in the current iteration of mainnet.
Eli Thompson
>That statement has nothing to do with the 700K dumps. You said the 700k batches were market sold. Binance has OTC, so it's possible they were sold OTC instead of market sold.
Nicholas Parker
>Btw, they were never "out" of circulation. Those tokens were never locked up in any way, they just sat in wallets.
They sure were, because the price is calculated based on the 350 million pre-mine sold to the public.
Once CMC or whoever updates with new supply, the price is going to tank badly, probably to below 20 cents.
>What makes you so certain
Network statistics, for one? Don't you know how to query APIs...?
And this is price based on old, 350 million supply.
Add another 10 million to the new circulating supply and then get the ratio from the current market cap for a new token price.
You Stinktards are in for a rude awakening.
Gavin Stewart
>They sure were, because the price is calculated based on the 350 million The price? Fucking lmao, the price is "calculated" based on supply and demand. You're thinking of the market cap.
>Once CMC or whoever updates with new supply, the price is going to tank badly All that will happen, is Chainlink will suddenly find itself many ranks higher. Which will only increase its exposure and fame, and thus attract more buyers.
>Network statistics, for one? Don't you know how to query APIs...? >See chart and influence on price. Pffffhahahaha Nobody knows where those tokens went, how they were sold, and even how many were sold.
Isaiah White
>Add another 10 million to the new circulating supply and then get the ratio from the current market cap for a new token price.
Isn't his point that eth is useless without something like chainlink
Ethan Hernandez
This is you on November 1st, 2009:
>("Bitcoins" which are used by 0% of the population)
Hunter Johnson
Actually I have to sell some stinkies because I have to buy a car next week :(
Parker Phillips
Accounting for another 10M circulating tokens will change the price by 10c at most. That’s not a very “rude” awakening.
The rude awakening will come when it becomes apparent that everything in September is priced in and that at the end of 2019, there still will be no legitimate companies using smart contracts (especially ChainLink tokens) for any kind of industry.
Elijah Long
>Accounting for another 10M circulating tokens will change the price by 10c at most. Why?
Lincoln Jackson
So you admit ChainLink is a useless crypto token whose sole hope of rising in value is if there are greater fools than you out there...?
