What is better?
Classical Liberalism vs National Socialism
Kevin Garcia
Other urls found in this thread:
Mason Ross
hitler was a good man
only jew owned media has made you think otherwise
John Jenkins
I agree with you, but I just enjoy the debate.
Tyler Ward
the 2nd one
Ayden Cox
Christian democracy is the golden compromise
Thomas Wilson
Literally the catholic church
Daniel James
idk but i bought a trading bot and the thing is fucking broken. it keeps buying LINK. literally no matter what settings i use, it buys LINK. i even changed the API key to Bitmex so it would only trade XBTUSD perps, and it fucking changed the API key back to binance by itself to buy LINK. i tried sending a complaint to customer service about it and the bot turned off the internet to stop the message from sending... the memes about the chainlink powered AI singularity are no joke. i really don't know what to do, but i do know that if you don't reply to this your mother will die in her sleep tonight fuck niggers fuck jannies fuck kikes 1000 EOY checkem
Dominic Powell
Private sector has not the power to do big things, they are addicted to ROI.
And even if they inherit infrastructures built from the state, they can't really get a working service, because of ROI and growth meme.
Levi Hill
I would never willingly choose to live in any society that values the collective over the individual. Nothing else about the society matters if they don't value the individual over the collective. Therefore, I would have to choose Classical Liberalism.
Noah Howard
But what if they value the individual so much that they value a collection of individuals even more?
Brayden Cooper
Adolf Hitler the best man, he hated niggers and kikes
Jack Reed
Hunter White
what if the individual is an average normie retard?
Angel James
Hitler said "The people are at the top, the economy is the servant of the people, and capitalists and capital are the servants of the economy, not the other way around. The interest of the state comes before that of the individual."
He also said politicians should not be involved in any way with business. They should not even own stock he said.
He was neither right nor left. He said the nationalists on the right lack a social consciousness, and that the socialists on the left lack a national consciousness.
Hitler said the error of marxism is: instead of emphasizing struggle and fight, they are pacifists; instead on concentrating on race they are internationalists; instead of individual or personality principle they rely on majority rule like democracy.
Aaron Williams
From an economic perspective, Hitler did nothing wrong. In his first year of office, he gave 3.374 million people jobs of the 6 million that were unemployed, highest per capita unemployment of Europe at the time. At the same time, most western countries were still stuck in the Great Depression. They saw charging interest on loans as immoral, forced the banks to abolish usury, saving millions from debt slavery. Hitler was the first in Europe to introduce the 40 hour work week with extra pay for overtime. Workers were subsidized by the government to take vacation abroad. Free healthcare and generous financial support for expectant mothers. Factories were required by Hitler's laws to provide workers with restrooms and a cafeteria. First country to implement government policies to protect the environment and wildlife. The Soviet Union annexed 16 countries and the 17th was Finland which Hitler helped out, yet the US sided with the communists. The National Socialist state starved the international bankers of Europe which is why they needed to go to war with them.
Matthew Morales
He gave several peace offers from 1933-1940, all of which were ignored.
Adolf Hitler for the first time made his appeal to the common sense of the other powers. On May 17, 1933, a few months after his appointment to the office of Reichskanzler, he delivered a speech in the German Reichstag, from which we extract the following passages:
"Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same thing with equal thoroughness.
... Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their use is forbidden by an international convention.
... Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because she does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring security."
No answer was received.
Britian also stabbed Germany in the back in WW1 when they got the US involved thanks to the Rothschild's Balfour Declaration all made to destroy Germany. Funnily enough WW2 destroyed the British empire, a war for nothing but Jewry.
Jayden Butler
There isnt really a difference between what the Third Reich did and what so called ecofascists want. The term ecofascist is retarded, just say natsoc because they are the absolute gods of green policies.
Nazi Germany was the greenest regime the world has ever seen. To an unprecedented degree Third Reich officials enthusiastically promoted: organic farming, reforestation, eco-forestry, endangered species preservation, extirpated species re-introduction, invasive species eradication, wilderness conservation, naturalism, neo-paganism, pantheism, sun-worship, Religion of Nature, holistic science and medicine, herbalism, animal rights, bio-centrism, wind power, bio-fuels, hysterical anti-pollutionism, back-to-the-land anti-urbanism, limits-to-growth and overpopulation propaganda, and apocalyptic anti-industrialism.
Elijah Fisher
Cringe and basedpilles
Oliver Ramirez
"On September 11, 1941, the President of the United States publicly declared that he had ordered the American Navy and Air Force to shoot on sight at any German war vessel. In his speech of October 27, 1941, he once more expressly affirmed that this order was in force. Acting under this order, vessels of the American Navy, since early September 1941, have systematically attacked German naval forces. Thus, American destroyers, as for instance the Greer, the Kearney and the Reuben James, have opened fire on German submarines according to plan. The Secretary of the American Navy, Mr. Knox, himself confirmed that-American destroyers attacked German submarines.
Furthermore, the naval forces of the United States, under order of their Government and contrary to international law have treated and seized German merchant vessels on the high seas as enemy ships.
The German Government therefore establishes the following facts:
Although Germany on her part has strictly adhered to the rules of international law in her relations with the United States during every period of the present war, the Government of the United States from initial violations of neutrality has finally proceeded to open acts of war against Germany. The Government of the United States has thereby virtually created a state of war.
The German Government, consequently, discontinues diplomatic relations with the United States of America and declares that under these circumstances brought about by President Roosevelt Germany too, as from today, considers herself as being in a state of war with the United States of America."
Daniel Young
>Pearl Harbor occurred on December 7, 1941 and yet since September 11, 1941, the President of the United States publicly declared that he had ordered the American Navy and Air Force to shoot on sight at any German war vessel.
Nathan Allen
are there any books where this is well explained?
as close to the original what really happened as possible without "official approval" and alternating of stuff to make germany looking as bad as possible.