What Cryptos Are Jow Forums Approved?

strawpoll.me/18614606
SETTLE THIS NOW

Attached: biz-approved.jpg (664x825, 64K)

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/18614606
thegreateststorynevertold.tv/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootless_cosmopolitan
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Bump the thread so it gets lots of votes and actually represents what people think.

NIGGER

Attached: 1565847082017.png (597x504, 103K)

zuckbucks > brapper

Bsv isn’t an option. What a useless poll

You forgot BCH

Vote brapper to ruin this blockstream shill’s data mining poll

But he included dentacoin?...

Kek I can vote multiple times by switching air plane mode... I voted for chiliz and harmony because I am allin LINK

You're missing a bunch of coins that get posted here often. Maybe you should create a thread, to make a solid list, before the voting.

>Monero
>Zcash
>Tether (I guess that usually gets hated on, but still)
>BCH
>USD
>Waltonchain
>

Also, I voted for Brapper, but mostly as a meme. I don't think it's a good investment, or anything. Perhaps you should separate the meme coins (e.g. Brapper, Dogecoin) from the actual coins that can be bought as speculation/investment (e.g. Bitcoin, Monero, Chainlink).

>Craig Wright is a Fraud

imblying

Attached: Rail-Her-While-Flexing.jpg (458x451, 19K)

>BCH is not a Jow Forums approved coin
Isn't that for Jow Forums to decide? By voting on it?

And you definitely missed Zcash and USD, too. I see people talk about those a lot, often positively.

Arguably, Tether is universally hated, and Waltonchain is just a dumb meme, so you could potentially ignore them.

Bitcoin, Chainlink and Cosmos are all good. I hold Holo too but I have near zero confidence in those boomers

Jow Forums is a National Socialist board, we dont support trash like zion cash with its backdoors and (((dev tax)))

>RSR only 7 votes and less than ONE
Did I buy a memebag?

Yea, its not on any good exchanges

>Jow Forums is Jow Forums
>I don't like Zcash
>I don't like BCH
>So I won't include them
Ok, I give up. This poll is pointless.

RSR is new. You can't easily separate the memes from the new ideas. Check back in a year and a half, and we'll be able to answer you.

>>Jow Forums is Jow Forums
Yes. Its 2015+4, come on man.

Attached: clown-world-pol-race-war-natsoc.png (1114x1138, 2.08M)

Hitler stuff is only funny if it triggers people like Sharia Labeef. Or ruins a Mountain Dew advertising campaign.

Sincere Nazism is just cringe.

Attached: 1564089505588.jpg (1024x691, 84K)

Yea sincerely opposing white genocide with something designed from the start to destroy communism (open borders globalism and ideas of equality etc) is totally cringe, wtf I love white genocide now.

Attached: ww2-veterans.jpg (463x692, 118K)

Attached: WW2-Veteran.png (507x923, 75K)

>Nazism
>Opposed to white genocide
Are Polish people white? Are Slavs white? Are (European) Jews white?

Because the Nazis pursued a campaign of hard genocide against all those groups. Like, they actually killed boatloads of them. Which is substantially harder than the immigration + forced mixing policies, which you're talking about.

>Nazism
>designed from the start to destroy ... ideas of equality
The movement is literally named, the "National Socialist German Workers Party". The reason they used the word "National", was because the Communists would often refer to themselves as "International Socialists", or "International Socialist Workers Party", or similar.

Nazism is essentially just Communism plus some weird romanticist elements that were popular in Germany at the time. And it's actually more cosmopolitanism and progressive. Actual Communism (e.g. Maoist China, Ho Chi Minh's vietnam, Stalin's Russia, Kim's North Korea) was more fundamentally opposed to open borders globalism than Nazism.

Try crossing the border in North Korea (the last remaining bastion of actual Stalin-era Communism). Or try moving goods across the Chinese border in 1970. Did the Nazis ever embrace that kind of opposition to open-borders globalism?

See

ALL COMMIES MUST DIE YOU COMMIE APOLOGIST

I'm not a commie apologist, you faggot.

I dislike both Nazis and Communists. Which is pretty easy, because they're rather similar ideologies.

Both anti-globalist, though. Which the guy I responded to, totally missed.

The short answer is youre wrong. The long answer youre not worth. Hitler did nothing wrong, the war was the allies fault.

Attached: Churchill-Zogbot.jpg (1633x1927, 845K)

Also didnt even read further on to see you have that god damn retarded boomer outlook. Yea, because redistributing the wealth and authoritarian leftism based on human equality is the same thing as no unearned wages and authoritarian anti-communism based on recognizing no one is equal are totally the same thing. They called themselves national socialists to trick the people who got long knived into thinking it was socialism. Its not marxist economic socialism, but of course you have a big long winded pile of smug trash as if you understood anything at all.

Attached: Goebbels-brothers.jpg (850x400, 56K)

>Did the Nazis ever embrace that kind of opposition to open-borders globalism?
Plan truster tier asinine question. You people need to die already. They would be shooting the fucking muds dead you god damned mental defective retard.

Attached: boomerposting.png (1000x750, 713K)

Boomers make me puke.

Attached: Goebbels-France-Niggers.png (1530x969, 1.37M)

Everything I said was accurate. You don't bother to understand anything, beyond blaming da jooz.

Also
>Which one of these men was a war-monger
Both of them, faggot. Plus, most of those quotes are substantial misrepresentations of the events, and by people nobody knows.

Hitler violated a boatload of treaties, half of which he signed himself, and all of which were made in good faith. Any country that does that is going to find itself internationally isolated. If Hitler hadn't done that, and just directly attacked the Soviets (or aided the free Polish forces, in defending themselves from the Soviet invasion), he would have had international support. Or, at least, no international opposition.

thegreateststorynevertold.tv/
KYS but only after watching that

Attached: the-eternal-boomer.jpg (480x360, 43K)

Attached: communists2.png (650x994, 600K)

Attached: jews are objectively the problem.jpg (924x10000, 2.05M)

Attached: jews-admit-white-genocide6.png (1736x1548, 1008K)

Attached: Jews-Admit-White-Genocide.jpg (1105x1460, 258K)

Hitler did nothing wrong.

Attached: hitlerdindu.jpg (1279x1385, 420K)

>use litecoin, more adoption.

Kek

>They called themselves national socialists to trick the people who got long knived into thinking it was socialism.
lel. See pic related.

>Yea, because redistributing the wealth and authoritarian leftism based on human equality is the same thing as no unearned wages and authoritarian anti-communism based on recognizing no one is equal are totally the same thing.
Wut. I don't even understand what you're saying. Are you implying that the Soviets were somehow "authoritarian leftists" and the Nazis weren't? Hitler and Stalin both sent people to death camps for

>homosexuality
>abortion (though Hitler made an exception for non-Aryan abortions)
>their religious affiliation (particularly, how Stalin treated Orthodox Christianity in the 1930s, or how Hitler treated the Confessing Church)

And the late-Stalin era had a anti-Semetic campaign, with Nazi-style rhetoric about Jews.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rootless_cosmopolitan

Obviously, they both had vaguely similar social policies. Honestly, you just like Nazism because the mainstream media demonizes it.

>Its not marxist economic socialism
No. But it's economic socialism, and a systematic socialist-style engineering of social norms.

I'm not a boomer.

Attached: a7b.jpg (680x582, 36K)

You don't understand anything about the period. Nor does that "greatest story never told" (which I glanced at a long time ago, and is bullshit). Seriously, read a book about Stalinist Russia, or Nazi Germany. Stop posting quotes from some random Jews, or

Feel free to start with Solzhenitsyn's book, since you quoted him. He wouldn't agree with your assessment of "Stalin-era Communism as a Jewish plot". Early Communism (a.k.a. Bolshevism), however, was very popular with secular Jews.

By the time of WW2, the Soviet elite had very few Jews left. Primarily because they had sent each other to death camps, or because Stalin had removed them.

Of course, you don't care, and will never learn.

>Hitler did nothing wrong
You ever notice the dichotomy?

Are your two choices really only these two?
>Hitler = Evil
>Hitler = Good

Can't be mixed? Can't be right about some stuff, and wrong about others? Can't be half-right about a lot of stuff? Can't be evil, with some distinct virtues? Can't be good, with some distinct vices?

I mean, even the most progressive person has to admit that the Nazis were right about tobacco, about 20 years before the rest of the world figured it out.

Every war in history is grey except ww2 for some unknown reason

Litecoin is better.

Not quite. Lots of people will dogmatically insist that other stuff was a struggle between good and evil. The American civil war, for example. Usually, these people are committed anti-racists, so it's not hard to figure that pattern out.

And you'll also see most pre-modern Christian historians saying that the Crusades were pure, divine and holy. Of course, they were usually affiliated with the Catholic church, so that's easy to figure out.

Of course, WW2 led to America conquering the world (specifically, by conquering Europe), and enforcing American ideology throughout Europe, and the rest of the world. Obviously it's American ideology, that drives the dogmatic "WW2 was a holy war" narrative.

...