Why satoj left Jow Forums

it's a more appealing idea to me than Twetch. I'm not really so much into that, it gives me cultish vibes but maybe its just because its yet to be widely adopted (if it will be). CityonChain is the more exciting project out there. But a chan type board could do well to put the poo back in the loo.

>typing out 8 characters is too much effort
well you found some cuck to do the heavy lifting for you so kudos I guess.

>But a chan type board could do well to put the poo back in the loo
This. Biz is so tiresome with all the low IQ posting. Pay to post and/or read could help a lot with that

STIFF

It was just a matter of time. I though about starting something similar myself but personal shit got in the way and I figured it was such an obvious next step some other doughty user would rise to the challenge and create an image board on the BSV blockchain.
I will say it right here: in an age where governments are going balls-to-the-wall to subvert and (((shut down))) the last bastion of free thought, this is the future. The fact that the monetary aspect being weaved in means that content quality should also improve is just the cherry on top.

Attached: 1558499233170.jpg (2400x3000, 1.81M)

Im not sure how censorship resistant BSV is desu senpai because at the end of the day they can just seize domains or get you kicked from ddos protection services like they did with dailystormer. none of this metanet shit means anything when they can just kick you off base level infrastructure IMO but wtf do I know. too bad the people behind BSV are out of touch boomers and dont really understand any of this.

Any blockchain can be censored by at the node level by a node operator, but as long as there are enough nodes in enough jurisdictions it should be fine. There will be economic incentives to serve "controversial content" as end users will pay slightly more for such a service.
Sure you could try ddosing an interface like haich.us, but that just creates competition at that level. The actual content is unaffected.

You should start reading Craig Wright's blog posts. What you mention is something he has been saying for a long long time. Bitcoin is not censorship resistant as government can enforce blockchain middlemen to filter specific TXs. What is filtered will differ from country to country, but filtered it will, and it seems Craig is the only one to understand this. What bitcoin changes is it leaves a paper trail of everything. Yes, you can filter, but bitcoin never forget and nothing ever gets deleted. craigwright.net/

He talks about it in this interview too
youtube.com/watch?v=V9T3Iw5OVtA

I am familiar with Craig's take on bitcoin censorship-resistance/anonymity.
"Censorship-resistance" is itself kind of a confusing term in this context because most people don't bother to specify against what the censorship-resistance applies.
Trying to be censorship resistant against the state is a losing battle for a massively scaling peer-to-peer ledger, but being censorship-resistant against the (((typical tricks))) of the ADL, et al., which is what is talking about, is perfectly doable.
Craig's view is that you can't subvert a court order with a blockchain, and he is correct, but you certainly can make it a nightmare for (((the usual suspects))) to use their usual pressure tactics to shut you down, as long as everything being targeted is legal.

Why would anyone believe a word out of that liars mouth

BSV is literally pro censorship
Craig is a CIA nigger