What would you do? Stay hidden behind your wall of anonymity? Or come out in the open and wreak as much havoc as you possibly could?
You are pic related
Michael Green
Nicholas Myers
>come out into the open
>rekkinf as much havoc as you could
That’s where you’re wrong buckeroo. You can do much more damage from the shadow
Owen Brown
I would do just like craig and rekt the haters and criminals as much as possible
Ayden Ross
Bitcoin lore is more important than the people behind it
Robert Morgan
I would market sell one billion dollars
Oliver Hall
Dump my Bitcoin just to see pink wojaks on biz and desperate comments on reddit
David Campbell
All would be well if that lore included respect for the white paper. Now its all about the people behind different versions.
Normies do not want system built for anarchistic pedophiles and terrorists.
Nathaniel Gutierrez
I would do this too, but only to chains I don’t like, primarily SV, and to a more limited extent BTG and BTCP.
Kayden Cook
Shill my next project on Jow Forums.
Cruzbit.
Evan Turner
Keanu Reeves?
Jayden Sanchez
This, the spectacle in honestly more important than the speaker. No one is going to care about anything namefags say or write 20 years from now. All the institutions that gave namefags credibility in the first place are collapsing. Look at the waves that total user accounts like BAP or zerohplovecraft are making on twitter.
Normies have no problem supporting the current system which was built by pedophiles in the first place. That’s why they’re fucking retarded normies. A shift towards user forces debate over ideas and reduces vulnerability to character assassination (which is only going to increase now that people’s entire lives are online under the control of tech companies). Legacy institutions can’t compete because they’ve never actually had to defend their dogma, and they can’t infiltrate simultaneous user movements as easily.
Ian Rodriguez
Act in /moviesandtelevision/
Connor Barnes
I would definitely sell my private keys to massively wealthy individuals behind closed doors, giving multiple parties the ability to claim the Satoshi identity while I personally fade into the background to enjoy my billions in quiet happiness.
Adam Allen
i would stay hidden but every year at btc anniversary i would sign a 1 liner message and post it on Jow Forums.
Josiah Martin
E. G. Rothschilds, Bildeberg, Putin, Salinas, who knows what else is lurking in the shadows
Jayden Fisher
i would fork away from BTC in order to repair the damage blockstream has caused to bitcoin and try to set the protocol in stone
Eli Brooks
Based and stiffpilled
Andrew Harris
This is a STIFF approved post
Jacob Allen
naive
Chase Myers
i would come out to the world as Satoshi but pretend i didnt understand my own whitepaper i wrote and refuse to provide any cryptographic proof. I would then claim the product i coded is garbage while paying others to code my new product which i plan on renaiming after my garbage product. Once its all said and done I will have destroyed my original work and any interest financial institutions had in blockchain just so i can dump a my new product on all those that were smart enough to see i was just pretending to be retarded all along; and if they dont like it? STIFF
Parker Russell
>accumulate some rank 300 shitcoin
>anonymously sign a message stating "[shitcoin] is the evolution of bitcoin"
>cash out without revealing your identity
it's that simple
Elijah Phillips
>i would fork away from BTC
an honest sv cuck thats a rare find
Ryan Lewis
Sergey Nazarov is Satoshi Nakamoto and he will never admit this fact.
dyor but there are direct connections to Sergey confirming this.
Samuel Kelly
There's no reason to come out. For the price of fame and attention, you'll lose your privacy and expose yourself to scrutiny by the authorities. Running the Ponzi scam while remaining in the shadows is far more practical.