I dont really have to say how much the quality of this board has been slowly eroded by the pajeets and discord trannies after mainnet. The fud is so low effort that is painful just to watch. I dont know how much i can take. I think the Jannies either have skin in the game or they are being paid to look the other way about the pajeet flood. And a few days ago , responding to a baseless ad-hominem of an obvious pajeet paid fudder i was banned from biz because i was being a troll. Banned for being a troll..... in biz... i had enough. I tried to figure out what would be the best way to make discord trannies seethe. I think i found out what i can do. but i wont be able to do it alone.
In order to at least try to improve the quality of the board im going to start a public service. Everyday, at least once, with this trip, i will post a quick rundown on Chainlinks wallet status. (source : Etherscan.io) I will try to crunch the numbers as hard as i can but for some specific wallets i will have to rely on other anons to find out.
If any of you have any idea about adding more variables or suggestion just post them here. i will try to add charts after a while but rn we dont have enough data.
Based, here is my binance wallet checking autism when bored at work. A lot of LINK leaving binance since May, I have started monitoring it daily in September, dont know if it means something but whatever
I monitor my relative wallet position almost weekly (top 250 wallet) and it rarely fluctuates more than +-4 positions. Top wallets arent moving.
Lincoln Hernandez
very based also DELETE
Mason Baker
this is gold user since the wayback machine didnt save token holder info. Once i get to crunch individual wallets its gonna get interesting. so far i presume there is a fair amount of recent big buys that were obsfuscated (poorly) through binance. If any user has similar info in spreadsheet format please share.
you can tell how every every transaction out of that wallet is tested with a single link but every transaction in is not making me think those are two separate people, so its probably an organizations wallet that is accumulating for actual use and not just hodling to sell high
Justin Barnes
Checked and based. The main reason I laugh at the morons posting garbage fud. Newsflash, the owners of large wallets don't hold onto investments that are questionable or at risk. You dumbasses keep selling into their hands and stay poor, you are too dumb to make it.
Justin Watson
Based
Juan Walker
You fucking idiots do realise you've fucked it all up don't you? The only chance you had to make it. And you fucked it!
Check out the multiple new wallets that have just under 4m LINK each and started withdrawing from Binance in July. That's where the difference in LINK went
Levi Brooks
no u
Grayson Rivera
based. bump
Colton Garcia
the water are drying up we heading to drought season.
bunch of sour bagholders in here who didnt sell above $4
Lincoln Gray
Based
Andrew Richardson
This. Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth. Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link was attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnership came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons. Now during this alt bull run lots of anons and took advantage of this and shilling this coin to all the new money and newfags that joined in december and don't know this story. The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes. In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team
