Why do linkers say chainlink crowdsale only got them $32 million dollars when there is evidence that proves to the...

Why do linkers say chainlink crowdsale only got them $32 million dollars when there is evidence that proves to the contrary?
This is chainlink's ICO address:
etherscan.io/txs?a=0xed53cd552b0b6ad68f8c17e7a17e2e16b53f4add
November 24: (ETH@$450)
$450 * 20,000 = $9,000,000
January 5 and 6: (ETH@$1000)
$1000 * 11,720 = $11,720,000

If you sum up all the ETH they got from the ICO, it adds up to about 117,500 ETH which if you multiply it by the average price of ETH back then ($280), it adds up to approximately the $32 million dollar cap they asked for.
So with only 33,720 ETH (about 28% of the total ETH from ICO), they made $20,720,000 (about 65% of the $32 million they asked for)
I'm not gonna sum up the other transactions, but it's obvious that they ended up making much much more money with that ICO ETH than the $32 million dollars that they asked for initially.

So now that the "they only made $32 million dollars from the ICO" myth is debunked, can anyone answer me why they need to dump tokens for money? What have they done to the ICO money to blow it all up in 2 years?

Attached: flvdtli7zya6mccpl2wi.jpg (675x675, 40K)

Other urls found in this thread:

etherscan.io/address/0x61d88f8d44798095d56c7bf56e113917324c1ff0
etherscan.io/address/0xcd43a19ea5e4f9fcf229df53f86747ad2c5613be
etherscan.io/address/0xcd43a19ea5e4f9fcf229df53f86747ad2c5613be#internaltx)
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>be this guy

never going to make it

because it's a scam? did you miss the memo? you were supposed to dump at $4

Attached: 1568392013450.png (945x745, 474K)

>he thinks sending tokens to binance = dumping

Attached: 950E71D724DD4325BD4B2993783770AA.jpg (640x845, 103K)

>So with only 33,720 ETH (about 28% of the total ETH from ICO), they made $20,720,000 (about 65% of the $32 million they asked for)
because heres where they sold the same amount of eth at $120 for about 4million:
etherscan.io/address/0x61d88f8d44798095d56c7bf56e113917324c1ff0

these guys probably did land close to the 32mil but they held alot well past ATH

thanks for the copy pasta OP. gonna use it every time i hear a stinker say that they only got 32 mil from ICO
>2017+2
>thinks hes gonna make it with crypto

There was no memo. $4 was unexpected you fucking retarded brainlet.

>2019
>thinking that crypto won't make it.

32 million solved my McDonalds problems you fucking nerd

I suppose you just better not buy any, OP. And if you don't buy any, I guess you should start posting about other projects you're actually invested in.

>he didn't get the memo
Hahahhahahahahahahahshqhahaha hahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahshahahahshshahshhavavahahahhshehhahsh

Patterns, user. It's the lifecycle of every shitcoin they are all similar to one degree.

Deviation from the mean is death. The finishing blow to a shitcoin regardless of emotional memes. You should have lurked before you invested and you would of seen the signs when they came.

MOAB.
Mixing.

All while rallying? You're not the intended audience, because you're not a true Jow Forumsraeli.

Tl;dr LURK MORE

Attached: 1511051916530.png (758x569, 943K)

also this is the ICO address:
etherscan.io/address/0xcd43a19ea5e4f9fcf229df53f86747ad2c5613be

you can see all the 6.999 transferes since the ICO had a 7 eth transfer limit after the pre-sale

thats the contract to which people sent their ETH. you can see in the internal transaction (etherscan.io/address/0xcd43a19ea5e4f9fcf229df53f86747ad2c5613be#internaltx) that they then send it to 2 addresses, the one OP posted and this one etherscan.io/address/0x61d88f8d44798095d56c7bf56e113917324c1ff0

And most of that money went to Ari Juels.

Attached: 1567055049073.jpg (332x206, 8K)

It's a wonder it didn't cost them a billion dollars to do what they have done. Changing the world isn't free.

>be OP
>prove conclusively that the ICO made Chainlink less money than previously thought
>try to hide it by saying you're not going to do the rest of the math necessary to prove my point
>"sO wHY r tehy dUMping"

Faggot.

Is this the new fud? Too technical Rajneesh

>literally just token movement between wallets
>too technical

Never gonna make it

Based