>Why the Right Can't Resist Sliming Parkland's Teenage Victims. Conservatives are losing the gun control debate, and growing increasingly desperate.
>Whether or not one agrees with their support for gun control, it should seem obvious that the survivors of the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, last month would be sympathetic figures. These young people have clearly been traumatized and are speaking out from sincere conviction, which suggests it would be unwise for those who disagree with their views to attack them personally. But that's exactly what conservative politicians and pundits are doing, and with increasing boldness.
>But these kinds of emotional pressures work both ways. The more vigorously right-wingers attack the Parkland kids, the more fiercely liberals will want to defend them. That matters, because one reason gun control has been so hard to pass is that pro-gun people, although they're a small minority, bring a level of passion to the cause that gun-control supporters simply don't. Research shows that gun owners are more likely to call elected officials than non-gun owners about gun policy. That could change if conservatives keep enraging liberals by picking on these traumatized kids. By trying to undermine these young activists, the right may only be giving them more power.
Worrying about optics, whilst others are trying to goad the government into killing itself.
Why do we care what happens to this faggot?
Adam Hernandez
Isn't this high school dropout's mammy some CNN employee?
Jeremiah Jones
Action : Whenever you see an article / tweet / post on normie media that makes you want to sperg out, but you can't act for fear of revealing your power level, simply reply with the following statement :
>"Thanks for pushing normal people even further to the right."
If they try to start an argument, simply keep repeating : >"As I said, thanks for pushing normal people even further to the right." to whatever arguments they try to make. Whenever you see the comment, upvote / like it.
Goals : - Demoralization. Make them realize that every action they take is counterproductive. - Subtly imply to bystanders that 'ordinary' people are already right wing. Remember, the major social currency among normies is conformity. If they believe that everybody else is moving right, so will they. - Point out that the rise of the right is a consequence of the actions & voices of the left. - Show 'the left' and the normies that we are everywhere, and that we are watching. Again, this plays into the normie desire to 'fit in'. - Embolden those who are already on the right but are kept silent by fear of social repercussions (see previous point). - The comment is polite and violates no 'guidelines'. They can't shut it down. - Short comments are more likely to be read, often more so than the actual article / post / story. - Create an atmosphere that discourages leftists to post in the first place.
This is solid enough that you could even post it on real accounts. If you ever have to walk it back just say “I AM a leftist myself. It was sarcasm. I meant that stuff like that damages OUR cause.” Even then, the statement has value as a divide and conquer strategy (ie. “a real leftist doesn’t believe that stuff”).
It doesn't matter whether you believe any of the above or not - the purpose is to make *them* believe it.
Discuss. Ignore divide & conquer shills and demoralization shills (anybody who ‘dismisses’ the plan without providing genuine criticism is a shill.)
Children are parasites. When they grow up and repay me for not letting them die a horrible death due to their stupidity. Then yes I will think of the children.
Carter Brooks
no. she was on the news recently or something and said she was a teacher. I know she was a teacher in California, but when I check her name a while back it said she was a realtor in florida. maybe she does both
Cooper Sullivan
>Conservatives are losing the gun control debate, and growing increasingly desperate. Literally none of this is actually happening outside of libtard delusions.
>conservatives are losing the gun control debate How so?
David Walker
>Conservatives are losing the gun control debate what debate? lots of conservatives have offered to debate, but usually get declined, or the other side of the debate can't do anything besides shriek baseless allegations and name call because they have no facts or data, or a basic understanding of the law or even how guns function.
Luis Price
I just called that number. I am disapoint. I dont want a medical alert system
Mason Lewis
>Conservatives are losing the gun control debate, and growing increasingly desperate.
>losing the debate even the least well spoken gun rights advocate can destroy lefties in a debate on guns
Cameron Allen
Yes, why don't we listen to what the kids have to say. Particularly the ones who weren't cutting class and then whining about not getting their pick of colleges.
Leo Parker
Get back to you studies I’ll remember you rode your bicycle to school now that you bought the BMW We’re hearing Stanford accepted you
>Conservatives are losing the gun control debate The only ones willing to debate are conservatives. David Hogg backed out of the listening session with Trump and then backed out of a debate with Alex Jones (when Hogg was the one to challenge Jones to a debate in the first place).
Austin Perez
Liberals literally have no response to someone explaining the real purpose of the 2nd Amendment: fighting against our own government. The best they got is "b-but the government will just bomb you and nuke you!" which is ludicrous and ignorant if they genuinely think that politicians pilot drones.
Thomas Martinez
>If we don't talk to the other side we win by default! Them right now.
This. What the fuck? The only thing that smacks of desperation is using CHILDREN to try and take the rights of adults by having them go to these stupid little marches and screaming on tv. Anyone else see that Hogg interview where he just starts dropping f-bombs and shit? Reminded me of when I was a kid and tried to sound tough on the internet. No one takes it seriously
At this point he’s just annoying. Like you weren’t even at school during the shooting you little nigger. Instead you took advantage of the situation to become famous. Bet he doesn’t even give a fuck about guns deep down, just wanted attention.
Tyler Myers
>Survive Parkland. >Become puppet to MSM. >Argue against second amendment. >Get bullied online. >Become forgotten by MSM. >Continue getting bullied online. >Suffer PTSD. >Still get bullied online. >Shoot up university.
>he doesn’t even give a fuck about guns deep down, just wanted attention. no he was trying to sell guns, his dad sells weapons to CA law enforcement and FBI
Oliver Miller
>survive parkland Little fucker was home that day. He gave an interview where he said he grabbed his camera and ran down to the school like a paparazzi when some celeb has her pussy out
Christopher Foster
He just banned non germans, so illegals jews gypsies etc.
Easton Roberts
Ok
Brayden Stewart
This is, ultimately, the plot of the narrative Hogg has created for himself. It will be his own fault.
Gabriel Parker
Wow, I'm starting to hate this kid more and more. >Father in FBI. >Home that day. >Media puppet. >Soros march. Not sure what to do with this information.
