Peterson attacked by Vox

Peterson attacked by Vox.
Peterson responds on Tucker, attacks far-left and far-right.
vox.com/world/2018/3/26/17144166/jordan-peterson-12-rules-for-life
youtube.com/watch?v=G3iuocT6574

Attached: file.png (751x796, 482K)

Other urls found in this thread:

eurocanadian.ca/2018/03/jordan-peterson-postmodernist-critic-white-identitarians.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Peterson responds on Tucker
Stop digging, Peterson.

This is how the left behaves. They snark the act all upset when someone bites back suggesting they did nothing wrong. It’s the same 10 yr old bully mentality. It’s he mental equivelant of suggesting ‘stop hitting yourself’

this particular piece by Vox seems to be 70% fair, the rest is attack from the usual ideological positions of "white privilege is real, so negating it is bad"

>on Tucker
>willingly go on Tucker
>expect to be taken seriously afterwards

MURICA

Attached: meanwhile.jpg (1024x1024, 161K)

Jordan Peterson Is A Postmodernist Critic Of White Identitarians

eurocanadian.ca/2018/03/jordan-peterson-postmodernist-critic-white-identitarians.html

>It can be said that Peterson does not deduce, at least overtly, any form of identity politics from the distinctions he notes between males and females. He wants males and females to be judged as individuals. He wants a politics in which a people's interests are not assumed to be determined by their membership in sexual or racial groups. But can one really avoid political proposals about the best interests of men and women if one agrees that there are substantive biological differences between these two sexes? Would it not be sensible to play up the truthfulness of traditional gender roles? This could be done in a free and democratic fashion, without state imposed sanctions, without negating anyone's individuality. The point is that education about traditional differences, and policy proposals thereof, are a form of identity politics that make judgments about individual men and women based on their membership in a sexual group.

>The same can be said about observable differences in races. White identitarians are not advocating against liberal freedoms but against the illiberal mandate that Whites, and only Whites, abstain from identity politics. Why does Peterson ignore the growing scientific literature supporting the identitarian view that humans generally have a preference for their ethnic in-group, and that such altruistic dispositions as sharing, loyalty, caring are exhibited primarily and intensively within in-groups rather than toward a universal "we" in disregard for one's community.

Attached: who_is_white_tho.png (638x440, 232K)

Is he worth listening to or am I better going my own way.

were you raised within a proper family and had a classical education?
skip him
if not, listen to him but without forgetting he is controlled opposition

Attached: 1517676053235.jpg (1024x576, 80K)

Yes, except on the JQ, where he is cucking or lying, because he fears the second Holocaust and has nice Jewish friends that he feels he needs to protect.

BTW, he is wrong on the killing in Soviet Russia: first it was Jews killing the elements of the old system, later it was Stalin killing those opposing his plan for Russian right-wing chauvinism.
AT NO POINT WAS IT ABOUT EQUALITY.

Attached: 1516705293429.png (950x634, 833K)