Creationists IQ= 68

At least creationists don't think niggers are our ancestors

>God is almighty and omnipotent
>Yet he had to designe animals in the same way humans are starting to do with GMOs and nanotechnology
So are we able to design an animal's structure from cell level to macro level of aesthetic looks and create a being that has not existed on this Earth before?

> >Yet he isn't able to design through evolution by tempering with the big bang
What makes you to believe this?
Why couldn't God do this?
Did you cuck even know that the Big Bang was first theorised by a Belgian catholic priest?
How did all of matter that exists have become existing? How was it able to fit into area smaller than a needle head?

Scientist have proven that central Africans inter bread with ape like anthropomorphs.

butthurt kike lover detected

How did already optimized creatures grow new half-organs that are not optimized yet for their surroundings and then somehow survive for multiple generatioms, competing with their unchanged and still optimized brethren, ling enough for these half-formed and useless organs to become functional and thus finally, after mulitple generations result in a new, optimized creature?

Evolution is philosophically impossible, mathematically impossible, religiously impossible, and scientifically impossible.

God created Heaven and Earth according to the Scripture. Only debate is Augustinian vs. Mainstream.

What I am trying to show is that you don't actually need to result to simplistic models of understanding in order to preserve your belief in god.

I know, Quantum physics studies are part of my physics bachelor.
Are you going to admit that there exists a probability for primordial structure of matter to have become existing by act of God?

Also we are only witnessing the premises of bioengeneering.

Yet already created a bacteria from scratch

Yes

> already created a bacteria from scratch
By planting a RNA section into already existing one or creating one completely from zero by chemically structuring this bacteria's functionality?

Then how can you tell me there's no entity equivalent to God?

I think that biblical literalism misses the point of christianity entirely

You can thank Protestants for that.
While every apostolic sect of Christianity has their own societies studying sciences.

go back to frogland frogboy

Best way to make someone disbelieve in the ‘intelligent design’ hypothesis is to give them an overview of neuroscience.

I will give some credit to them that biology’s “design” plans for certain functions are actually beautiful. Learning about the auditory system is having the worlds most brilliant engineer describe how they separated out so many types of signals in a purely mechanical way. It’s beyond belief how well it was “built”, so I can understand doubting that there was system that was involved with this. But, at the same time, the visual processing system (as good as it is), from an engineering perspective sucks. There are only a few distinct neural systems trying to separate out all of these signals. It’s metabolically wasteful beyond belief, and any “designer” with omnipotence would recognize that a system with better visual receptors would do wonders for color perception and object distinction. It’s good, don’t get me wrong, but a technically skilled enough designer would have implemented a better system to code visual sensory information. Moreover, a skilled enough designer wouldn’t have easily manipulated and abused reward processing pathways, since a skilled designer would have foreseen that certain stimulation could end up being preferable to the normal functions of life.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want to bash on religion or the idea of god. I still have a part of me that legitimately believes in one, but if you believe in creationism you would have to also believe god to be an inconsistent (though on the whole excellent) engineer.

I was only the beginning
>liposomes are about to be mass produced for targeted medecine delivery.

Soon we would be able to create a membrane.

>>proofs the old testament is real 0
>>proofs evolution is real: + 1 000 000
The word you're looking for is "evidence", not "proofs", and there is plenty of evidence, archaeology and otherwise, for the old testament's being true. (You may feel the evidence against it is greater but that's a different claim.) This kind of line is a dead giveaway that you are not a rational person.

>naive arguments regarding God's purpose for the world, design tradeoffs, and what all precisely falls under the rubric of evolution.
saged

I never said anything as such.

Gay thread

> Soon we would be able to create a membrane.
This has been done already with artificial meat. You're late with your news.
I can only imagine the cost of it, and energy & resource requirements of turning the technology into mainstream mass consumption.
There's going to be a long work ahead to turn anything of this into scientific dream.

>Yet already created a bacteria from scratch
People really need to stop getting their "information" from pop science sources. They took a subset of the genome to try to form a minimal cell (which is still quite complex). They didn't design the genes or any such thing. And even if they did, all that you would be showing is that an intelligent agent can design life... which is what we're already saying.

There is no version of the old testament that is older than 150 AD
>but muh oral tradition
Epic of Gilgamesh exists from 2000 BC and proves that the story of Noah is a rip off. Ergo there is no sons of Noah. There is no Shem. Ergo there is no such thing as a semitic people. Ergo, antisemitism is a made up word used to silence criticism.

> They didn't design the genes or any such thing
So this lying Frog needs to deceive to make his point, like every other Atheist+ cuckold.

Evolutionary AI designed plane parts are already better than the original

One can only imagine the wonders it would be to acheve in bioengineering

If there are "gods" they are men that mastered scientific principles that dick around with other men with lower IQs.

Frog and meme flag were happy to debate eachother until these got busted out