BREAKING: AG Sessions revealed Thursday that Utah's top federal prosecutor, John Huber, is investigating a cluster of Republican-driven accusations against the FBI & has decided that no second special counsel is needed
Action : Whenever you see an article / tweet / post on normie media that makes you want to sperg out, but you can't act for fear of revealing your power level, simply reply with the following statement :
>"Thanks for pushing normal people even further to the right."
If they try to start an argument, simply keep repeating : >"As I said, thanks for pushing normal people even further to the right." to whatever arguments they try to make. Whenever you see the comment, upvote / like it.
Goals : - Demoralization. Make them realize that every action they take is counterproductive. - Subtly imply to bystanders that 'ordinary' people are already right wing. Remember, the major social currency among normies is conformity. If they believe that everybody else is moving right, so will they. - Point out that the rise of the right is a consequence of the actions & voices of the left. - Show 'the left' and the normies that we are everywhere, and that we are watching. Again, this plays into the normie desire to 'fit in'. - Embolden those who are already on the right but are kept silent by fear of social repercussions (see previous point). - The comment is polite and violates no 'guidelines'. They can't shut it down. - Short comments are more likely to be read, often more so than the actual article / post / story. - Create an atmosphere that discourages leftists to post in the first place.
This is solid enough that you could even post it on real accounts. If you ever have to walk it back just say “I AM a leftist myself. It was sarcasm. I meant that stuff like that damages OUR cause.” Even then, the statement has value as a divide and conquer strategy (ie. “a real leftist doesn’t believe that stuff”).
It doesn't matter whether you believe any of the above or not - the purpose is to make *them* believe it.
Discuss. Ignore divide & conquer shills and demoralization shills (anybody who ‘dismisses’ the plan without providing genuine criticism is a shill.)
John Baker
halos dead theres no point in playing consoles
its sad i really wanted to play console games another time in my life
but whats the point i guess people are playing games on pc more now anyways
>After the convention, Denman told Reuters in 2016, J.D. Gordon, a Trump foreign policy adviser, told her he was going to speak to Trump about the language on Ukraine, and that Trump’s campaign team played a direct role in softening the platform language.
>The Trump campaign has denied playing any role in the weakening of the party’s position regarding Ukraine. Gordon has called Denman’s version of events “inaccurate.”
>However, Gordon has previously said he changed the language because of Trump’s position at the campaign’s March 31 National Security Committee meeting. The one where Papadopoulos offered to set up a Trump-Putin meeting.
>The Platform meeting on Ukraine was 7/13.
>On 7/14, Page emailed JD Gordon and others "As for the Ukraine amendment, excellent work".
>The same day, Papadopoulos emailed his Russian contact Timofeev and suggested a meeting in Aug or Sep in London b/w "national chairman" (Manafort) and "maybe one other foreign policy advisor" (? Page) and Timofeev, "members of president putin's office and the mfa". Papad says meeting "has been approved from our side".
Carson Roberts
Ofc not. Paris is still a mudslime hellhole.
Daniel Cox
fuck off JIDF
Adrian Bailey
Well then I guess this is a silent acceptance for Trump to utilize intelligence agencies against whoever runs against him in 2020.
Gonna be fun listening Trump to banter about their secrets.
Caleb Young
I need somebody to talk me down from killing my ex girlfriend
>does Sessions just really hate special counsels or something? A Special Counsel does not report directly to the AG user. I bet if he named a special independent counsel democrats would end up getting "their guy" there as well
Jace Evans
Why did Laura apologize? Hogg getting rejected is literally the #1 story on nypost.com
His SAT score sucks. All the cheating soulless Asians applying to UCLA have perfect SAT scores. If Hogg had a brain he'd realize unchecked immigration from the Far East, DACA and other illegals from Mexico, and various far-left policies killed his chances at getting into the UC System
UCLA rejected 100,000 this year. Why? Because California let in 20 million Chinese, Koreans, Indians and Mexicans...so white boy Hogg isn't exotic enough to get admitted. This should redpill his dumb ass
Parker Wright
Fat shaming! That's rich.
Gavin Stewart
Fans for avoiding gassings, smart move IDF, smart move.
Kayden Cruz
Few things are more disgusting than women in the military.
Reminder that Hogg and his band of gay brown goblins were better organized and behaved than Richard Spencer and his horde or TRS "master race" whitebois.
>Consoles are for niggers now. Yeah I know. 343 Studios fucked Halo up and I posted earlier about Gears of War and the main dude behind Gears went full SJW before it was even cool. Consoles and actually all modern games are absolute garbage. I can't even remember the last AAA game I bought. I think it was like a dumb Mario game for the Wii U. Talk shit about Nintendo all you want, but at least their rehashes of the same franchises are fun. I mostly just buy games from GOG if I need something new (old) to entertain me for a weekend. Plus I'm at least supporting a company worth supporting. If any vidya business these days deserve support, it's CD Projekt Red.
No they weren't. Spencer got exactly what he was looking for when he got a press conference to film and publish his "hail Trump hail Our people" stunt. It is only that his goal was to destroy the nascent coalition of right wing aligned groups, not to build it up
Jack Morgan
>Lawyer to investigate if you should investigate So no actual investigation of FBI/DOJ is going on by this guy
Anthony Hall
A baptist that is leaving Protestantism and heading to the only true answer.
>Missing from all the talk is what the Republican platform actually said before it was allegedly "gutted" by Trump. What did the original draft of the platform say about Russia and Ukraine? Was it, in fact, changed? If so, how?
>As it turns out, a look at the original draft of the platform — which has never been released publicly — shows that it always had tough language on Russian aggression in Ukraine. And not only did that language stay in the final platform — nothing was taken out — it was actually strengthened, not weakened, as a result of events at the convention.
And the best part, direct quote from Denman herself
>"The platform ended up tougher than it started, compared from the beginning to the end," Denman told me
