The ONLY acceptable outcome is a complete and total repeal of ALL anti-gun laws, all the way back to 1934. Every single regulation restricting the 2nd Amendment Rights of American Citizens is Unconstitutional and MUST be removed immediately.
As with our rights to free speech and privacy, this freedom to keep and bear arms is absolute and shall NOT be infringed. There is NO room for "compromise" on our Constitutional Rights. Zero. None. Ever. Period. End of discussion. I will not tolerate anything less.
this coming from a EUROFAG, who is enslaved by tyrants in Belgium! Bringing in a Muslim Army to kill you and rape your women! Dr. Freud said a fear of weapons is a sign of sexual and emotional immaturity.
Cameron Thompson
you're right we need a reform to get rid of all gun laws.
Christopher Flores
Show flags you larping kikes
Juan Wilson
Unconstitutional law is not law, AS such i dont abide by any guns laws period!
Wyatt Collins
With the current heated debate over gun rights and the 2nd Amendment of the United States Constitution (which serves to affirm our natural rights…rights we have whether the State recognizes them or not), I thought it might be interesting to talk briefly about the Battle of Athens. If you’re like a lot of people, you probably haven’t heard about this event. I know I hadn’t until a few years ago, which is kind of surprising, considering how much the media and the left constantly drone on over various historical “milestones” revolving around identity politics (race, gender, social justice, etc.). But I guess this doesn’t really fit the narrative, as it revolves around the South, and regular folks resisting their local government – and perhaps even a form of the Police State – through exercising their right to keep and bear arms.
The Battle of Athens, which happened August 1-2, 1946 in McMinn County, Tennessee, was the result of some 3000 veterans returning home at the end of World War II. Unhappy with the roughshod political corruption, fraud, control over newspapers, schools and police “fee gathering” that had been going on in McMinn County while they were away from home – with even a couple of servicemen shot and killed by the police while home on leave – these guys decided to do something about it. So like any sensible group of people would do, they organized and decided to run a number of nonpartisan candidates for positions in the local government.
However, the local sheriff and the political machine evidently felt threatened by such activity, and brought in 200 armed deputies to intimidate people at the polls. Former veterans were beaten, and one poll watcher was reportedly shot. After multiple other incidents, the sheriff opted to take the ballot boxes to the jail for counting.
Much of the McMinn County citizenry smelled a rat (so to speak), and the former vets surrounded and laid siege to the jail after gathering up firearms and ammo. After gunfire was exchanged, the GIs dynamited the jail during the early hours of August 2 and forced the occupants inside to surrender. After posting guards to secure the ballots, the votes were counted and the corrupt government leaders were voted out.
Miraculously, no-one was killed – although there were quite a number who were seriously injured and required hospitalization. However, the people of McMinn County, Tennessee were once again free to enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Something they might not have been able to do if the citizens were only armed with sling-shots and squirt guns. So…still confused as to why guys like Thomas Jefferson believed that the right of the people to keep and bear arms, and that it shouldn’t be infringed upon by the government was and is considered such an important thing?
I agree. I got convicted of a non-violent felony back in 08' when I was 18 and I've never been able to legally own a gun. There's too many fuckin gun control laws out there, I have no clue what these liberal retards are talking about
Luis Torres
Do you believe in God? Yes or no?
Bentley Scott
You know how I can tell that you've never been to Europe and just sit behind a computer screen all day? Literally none of that is true, I see far more east Asians than I do Muslims where I live. And most of these people are just civilians who were fleeing a war zone, if you think that makes them an "army" by any stretch then you're a few sandwiches short of a picnic.
Austin Murphy
Of course.
Adrian Ortiz
Uh I was stationed in Germany for 3 years in the US ARMY EUROFAG, Nice try. And NO they are not just Civilians, It has been proven MOST of them are former ISIS soldiers. You're not the brightest crayon in the box are you!
Michael Adams
ok then, fuck what the government says. Own you a gun, anyway you can. God says that we have a right to defend ourselves! You cannot serve two masters!
Adrian Stewart
>become brave >jamal tries to mug me for my wallet and boyhole >say "bro, just knock it off" >he freezes instantly >"sure nigga" >he gives me his wallet, glock, and bottle of hennesy shit, I guess I just wasn't trying hard enough
Liam Ward
Not that I would do anything illegal but I'm a machinist by trade. Finishing 80% lowers and acquiring the rest is cake.
These people that want to ban guns have drawn out the process way too long. People have gotten some much time to prepare for such an event that it won't even matter if they do.
Eli Perry
Illegal?? Unconstitutional law is not law, hence cannot be illegal! Being a JEW was once illegal!!
Ever see a nigger militia fight in the revolution? Common sense gun control would be banning niggers from owning them since thats the real problem in the US.
Daniel Williams
And look where we are now
Jose Morris
Daily reminder that cops DO NOT have a duty to protect citizens, according to Washington D.C. supreme court.
2 women were home during burglary. They hid and called police, twice. Police drove by their house, twice- did nothing else. Burglars found the women and then beat and raped them for 17 hours. They sued the city. Court ruled that: >police DO NOT have a duty to protect individual citizens, their duty is owed to the population at large. According to the government- the only people responsible for your safety...is you.
You're a degenerate and should never be allowed to own a firearm. However, there should be zero restrictions on gun ownership for law-abiding white males.
Jackson Jones
CIVIL WAR BITCHES
Jason Allen
we live in a civilized nation where nothing bad ever happens, especially to unarmed old White men; amirite tho?
define law abiding?? Laws change all the time! So im confused by your degenerate statement!
Isaiah Young
don't respond to flaggots
Brandon Wright
ok I wont!
Carson Sullivan
DINDU NUFFIN!!
Connor Watson
Ok ill use WP gas instead. >hits you with flaming toxic gasses
David Butler
All communists must be killed.
Connor Sanchez
Thanks for the bump, jew.
Luke Gonzalez
Hiding behind a meme flag
Sebastian Ortiz
You're a fucking idiot, I went into an abandoned/condemned house when I was 18 years old and got convicted of burglary.
I've never committed a crime that was violent, drug related or sexual. I also haven't committed a crime in a decade, my constitutional rights should not be forfeit for life because of that.
Jordan Carter
I hate niggers so much and this is the reason why
Ryder Wilson
damn anybody think about the fact that the columbine massacre happened just 5 years after the gun free school zones act, and the school shootings have been common since then
The 2nd Amendment recognizes that you are solely responsible for your own safety, that no one else but you is even capable of providing such safety, and guarantees that you will never be denied the best tool for the job. Politicians want you defenseless not because it serves your best interests, but because it serves THEIR lust for power over you.
Lifetime ban on gun ownership is an unconstitutional punishment inflicted upon a person who has served their proscribed sentence and been released from custody. All free men must be entitled to the full exercise of their rights, regardless of previous conviction. This applies to ALL constitutional rights, not just some.
Chase Bailey
Government is FORCE. This is why it must be severely limited in authority. Almost to the point of being non-existent. We are far down the garden path away from where we should be in terms of appropriate limits on authorized use of force by government.
Cute comic, but I gotta say, I didn't have a problem getting a gun. None of those bills stop me from getting a decent semi-auto weapon to defend my home, but do make it difficult/expensive to obtain a full-auto firearm. Most Americans support strict regulations on machine guns, and you could argue that all weapons should be legal to defend against tyranny. I hear ya. But, my point is that the comic makes it seem like it is difficult to get a gun in America. A country with 300million guns.
>None of those bills stop me from getting a decent semi-auto weapon That's because the law is now defeated by technology. You want an M4A1 Carbine? Just CNC mill an 80% lower to spec and assemble everything else from parts available online
No kidding? Maybe his amnesty measure wasn't the right idea either, huh
Ayden Morales
This argument greatly misses the point in asserting the availability of non-prohibited weapons. No one is arguing that a total ban yet exists. You are essentially arguing that the ability to buy a kitchen knife does not limit the ability to buy an illegal sword. This is counterfactual.
No prohibition whatsoever is allowed under constitutional mandate. All such laws limiting the ability to keep and bear arms of their choice violate the rights of US citizens. Pointing to a tiny slice of "allowed" weapons as proof of availability is to wilfully ignore the vast "cake" which has been disallowed in violation of the Constitution.
Just to add on to what said, your argument amounts to >Hate speech laws don't violate the First Amendment, as they wouldn't stop me from speaking my mind on things I want to speak my mind about, I just can't say that a certain genocide or another didn't happen, but if it did the supposed victims would have deserved it >PRISM doesn't violate the Fourth Amendment, since it doesn't stop me from securing my information from my local police department, but does make some information available to the NSA >Having plaintiffs in a rape case appear 'virtually' doesn't violate the Sixth Amendment, since they could still see the accused and vice versa, and can respond in real time I could go on. An inch invariably turns into a mile, and in infringement no matter how small is still an infringement.
Parker Morales
Respect man. Had the same happen to my brother at 19. He's absolutely the best of us.
Samuel Powell
Go your cremated ashes into a whore's dildo and jam it up your mothers ass.
Thomas Cook
Bring the assault weapons ban back.
Caleb Lewis
I always see a dispraportionate amount of muslims everytime I go to Europe. Doesnt really matter where unless its Eastern Europe either.
As America is an uncivilised land filled with inferior mutts, I tend to think they do need guns. Reminder that America hasn't been settled yet, it's not recognised by the civilised world. No decent, educated civilised person needs firearms.
Nicholas Robinson
You lost to emus while using guns.
Juan Walker
How's your Chinese coming along?
Benjamin Morales
Like fucking clockwork
Anthony Rogers
ching chong ding dong ling long bing bong ting tong ming mong sucky sucky 5 dolla
Grayson Brooks
I agree, but not in regards to just machine guns and the like. Eventually the government won't even need soldiers, they'd have drones. You need to be able to deal with drones
Not advocating for gun control, but didn't he spend his sunset years getting shot by a crazy guy with a gun?
Ryan Jones
All you can do is try to annoy us. Thats how far you've fallen, from about to irreversably install a one world communist government, to rambling nonsense on a chinese cartoon girl forum
What the hell is the Federal Reserve you ask? Well, it is a private bank that has enslaved you and your family since its founding in 1913 under the passage of the Federal Reserve Act. Did you know before 1913 there was no need for an income tax? Did you know that after the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the IRS was established to forcefully take your tax dollars through threat of death or imprisonment? In 1913 a plan to enslave the entire United States was completed. The act allowed the treasury to give money creation power to the Fed and also created the system which is called Central Banking. The people who crafted the Central Banking scheme are called Keynesians. Remember this name, they are traitors that need to be shot. For the past 100 years over 6% of your life’s income, the proof of your talents, your sweat and blood, your life energy, has been siphoned away. The real kicker is that none of it goes to roads, social programs, or even govt. It goes to pay imaginary debt that can never be paid back. It is pure unadulterated insanity. This is one of the most important things you can ever learn in your entire life. If you want to fight the system, well, this IS the system, the system of enslavement. Through the creation of the Federal Reserve, the government no longer needs to vote on raising taxes either! Isnt that great? Instead they print more money which causes the value of YOUR dollars to decrease. Theft.
I have compiled a few very efficient educational resources to teach you all and wake you the fuck up. Are you tired of being a slave? I hope one day enough people are, it’s going to take war and blood to change this. It’s time to start finding people who will stand up to tyranny. 1776 The Death of the American Dream: youtube.com/watch?v=mII9NZ8MMVM The Central Banking Enslavement System revealed: youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0 The detailed story of how the Federal Reserve Act was created: youtube.com/watch?v=lu_VqX6J93k
I can support this, provided that the means by which we achieve reform is through threat of forceful removal (a right bestowed to us by the founding fathers). Otherwise, it'll be reform just like net neutrality was neutral, the Patriot Act was patriotic, and the Stop Enabling Sex Trafficking Act will stop enabling sex trafficking.
Adrian Baker
Should we abide by the laws created by a criminal government?
