aleteia.org
A 3D printed copy of Jesus Christ was created based on the Shroud of Turin.
>"We believe that we have the precise image of what Jesus looked like on this earth," said Professor Giulio Fanti of the University of Padua.
>“According to our studies, Jesus was a man of extraordinary beauty. Long-limbed, but very robust, he was nearly 5 ft. 11 in. tall, whereas the average height at the time was around 5 ft. 5 in. And he had a regal and majestic expression.”
Other urls found in this thread:
jewsforhitler.com
thenazareneway.com
tertullian.org
bibleask.org
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
but did he have a bbc
no that's why he is trying to hide it from everyone
I thought they figured out it was paint
>nearly 5 ft. 11 in.
He's looking out for us so we aren't forever shamed by his 12 inch hog.
When can we go full 5th Element and clone him
REMINDER THAT ACCORDING TO THE BIBLE, JESUS HAD THE SAME DNA AS ANCIENT SPARTANS.
Chapter 12 verse 20-23 of the Book of Maccabees I
"Arius, king of the Spartans, sends greetings to Onias, the chief priest. It has been found in a writing concerning the Spartans and Jews, that they are a kinsmen, and that they are descended from Abraham. Now since we have learned this, please write us about your welfare. We for our part write you that your cattle and property are ours and ours are yours. So we command them to report to you to this effect."
According to one reading of Josephus, Josephus makes the same claim:
"Areus, King of the Lacedemonians, to Onias, sendeth greeting ... we have discovered that both the Jews and the Lacedemonians (Spartans) are of one stock, and are derived from the kindred of Abraham ... This letter is four-square; and the seal is an eagle, with a dragon in his claws"(Ant.12:4:10).
>jews literally LARPING as spartans
You will no doubt say "wtf, jesus was a jew and the spartans weren't jews" and that is correct, because Jew isn't the same as Israelite.
Jesus was descended from the line of Israel, from King David. Not the line of the Jews. Completely different.
For more information, please visit jewsforhitler.com
>he was nearly 5 ft. 11 in. tall, whereas the average height at the time was around 5 ft. 5 in
white Jesus confirmed
Jamie, see if you can pull up a picture of Jesus's hog real quick --
jesus was a 5'11" redhead with fair complexion, niggers btfo
>>“According to our studies, Jesus was a man of extraordinary beauty. Long-limbed, but very robust, he was nearly 5 ft. 11 in. tall, whereas the average height at the time was around 5 ft. 5 in. And he had a regal and majestic expression.”
Isaiah 53:
He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him.
Our Messiah had modest looks. Therefore this professor is very mistaken or is a total lier.
TO TIBERIUS CAESAR:
A young man appeared in Galilee preaching with humble unction, a new law in the Name of the God that had sent Him. At first I was apprehensive that His design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled. Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day I observed in the midst of a group of people a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected so great was the difference between Him and those who were listening to Him. HIS GOLDEN COLORED HAIR AND BEARD GAVE TO HIS APPEARANCE A CELESTIAL ASPECT. He appeared to be about 30 years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. WHAT A CONTRAST BETWEEN HIM AND HIS BEARERS WITH THEIR BLACK BEARDS AND TAWNY COMPLEXTIONS! Unwilling to interrupt Him by my presence, I continued my walk but signified to my secretary to join the group and listen. Later, my secretary reported that never had he seen in the works of all the philosophers anything that compared to the teachings of Jesus. He told me that Jesus was neither seditious nor rebellious, so we extended to Him our protection. He was at liberty to act, to speak, to assemble and to address the people. This unlimited freedom provoked the Jews -- not the poor but the rich and powerful.
Your most obedient servant,
Pontius Pilate
But Jesus was a brown man though
*liar
-
Why modest? If you take that scripture literally it says "he had no beauty" which means he was super ugly. Literally "no beauty." Of course this is wrong so what do we do?
Turns out that scripture is referring to Jesus' majesty which is the very next word used after "beauty." It's saying He didn't come with a royal crown and procession, that they might be attracted to Him.
Our Savior was built and handsome. He was the best of all men.
Another description of Jesus is found in "The Archko Volume" which contains official court documents from the days of Jesus. This information substantiates that He came from racial lines which had blue eyes and golden hair. In a chapter entitled "Gamaliel's Interview" it states concerning Jesus (Yeshua) appearance:
"I asked him to describe this person to me, so that I might know him if I should meet him. He said: 'If you ever meet him [Yeshua] you will know him. While he is nothing but a man, there is something about him that distinguishes him from every other man. He is the picture of his mother, only he has not her smooth, round face. HIS HAIR IS A LITTLE MORE GOLDEN THAN HERS, though it is as much from sunburn as anything else. He is tall, and his shoulders are a little drooped; his visage is thin and of a swarthy complexion, though this is from exposure. HIS EYES ARE LARGE AND A SOFT BLUE, and rather dull and heavy....' This Jew [Nazarite] is convinced that he is the Messiah of the world. ...this was the same person that was born of the virgin in Bethlehem some twenty-six years before..."
this is from a prophetic point of view, tells of a messiah seen from the public eye, to wich he was wicked.
>shroud of turin.
Fuck off that shit was fake, being really old
doesn't make is less fake you boon.
>using a fake holy relic to make another image of a fake person
dropping bombs over here!
Ancient peoples were tiny.
Vikangs were considered "tall as trees" by arabs and byzantines. The average height of vikings was 5'7.
>official court documents from the days of Jesus
sure thing nigger
>Romans didn't keep records during the time of Jesus
>No one did in fact
>Everybody was just banging sticks on rocks and pooping in the woods
Australian intellectuals.
the shroud is a proven lie created a few
hundred years ago, evidently by the plaster guy.
Source on this?
Thats a kiwi you mutt
It's a forgery from 1879 that plagiarized the short story Ponce Pilate à Vienne
Your education is not complete. Read.
It is written that he had no beauty and nothing in his appearance that we should desire him. This must quite literally mean that Jesus was not physically attractive by any means. He was the guy who no one would want to hang around. This is in opposition to the vanity and pride that Lucifer had in his own beauty, who fell from heaven primordially because of this.
This.
>Maccabees
bible
Wrong, the very next word after "beauty" is "majesty" so why would they put those two together? It makes no sense unless you realize the term "beauty" meant something different 2,700 years ago than it does today.
Being ugly is not important to God's mission. The Son of God wasn't a fat ugly loser He was the best of all men perfect in every way and yet still retained His human nature. His mother wasn't even stained with original sin.
Saying Lucifer was beautiful so Jesus had to be an uggo is just dumb. Lucifer fell because of his pride and desiring to be like God, not because he looked good.
I can't believe I used to be a Catholic. Glad I converted to Christianity.
It is written in the Bible that Lucifer was one of the most beautiful and prodigious angels, and because of this he became too haughty and rebelled.
Meekness and humbleness are always portrayed as important characteristics of Jesus, besides being qualities that He commanded us to have.
Don't confound external physical beauty with the beauty of His Spirit and his infinite Glory. Don't be naïve.
Intelligent anons:
Stop thinking about religion, which deals in subjectivity, in the context of absolutes. Reality itself is a meme. Which religion, as a meme, is superior to all others? This is how you must think.
Wait what the fuck, is this real? source?
>Catholic heretics will worship this
The shroud was carbon dated from the middle ages , then they claimed it was from a restoration from that time . Then the vatican made it so that it is no longer able to be carbon dated.
>really makes me think
For someone from Roman Empire Age, that's tall as fuck. He'd be 7 feet plus if he was alive today.
“Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor” (Ezekiel 28:17). "
bibleask.org
>It is written in the Bible that Lucifer was one of the most beautiful and prodigious angels
citation needed
Hellenized Jews in Alexandria WE WUZ'd the Greeks.
This crap is where "Jews built the pyramids" and "Jews were Hyksos" and "Jews had a giant Empire under David" all come from-- stealing from Greeks and then lying about Jewish "accomplishments".
This is also where "Jesus was pacifist philosopher and gnostic who loved all mankind" comes from-- those same lying Hellenized jews, just a couple hundred years later.
Fake news = real Jews and it has been that way for 2000+ years.
italians are hopelessly superstitious worshippers of graven images
the L-rd literally bans making human images like the one in OP
The "lack of beauty" bit in Isaiah is from the Suffering Servant passage, and likely refers not to Jesus' looks per se, but his disfiguring wounds to the face and body he received during his Passion. He became a man hide their eyes from And shake their heads at. Something terrible and terrifying and grotesque. But that was not who he really was.
The Gospels repeatedly show people being struck by his authoritative presence, constantly drawn to him like they would be to a great leader. He was the Son of David, who was himself very handsome. He was also very physically strong, not just because of his life as a manual laborer (recall "tekton" in Greek has a wider meaning than just a carpenter), but also years of hard living. His Passion alone was a feat of incredible physical strength and endurance, such that it caused even the Romans looking on to marvel. "Truly this man was the Son of God."
does. Jamie ever get tired of being 'siri' for mr Rogan?
If you look at the Galilee region at that time you would see scandinavian merchants on boats.
Very fair skinned and slender/tall compared to the romans or arabs.
While known as Jesus of nazareth he isn't nazareen and he grew up in Galilee.
Just saying that it wasn't a "desert of darkies" like it's always portrayed.
Galilee was very diverse for it's time as a trade city.
Jesus could of been white.
At least a few of the disciples must've been tall as well, otherwise Judas could've said "arrest the tall guy" rather than going over and kissing him to identify him.
Your loss, fren. Come back.
People in the 1900s were tiny. My buddy has his great grand fathers dress uniform from WW1, guy was in the Marines for like 44 years or something crazy like that. The jacket was so tight that I couldn't fit into it was I was around 13 years old, and I was a lanklet my entire life.
The amount of food we eat and the consistency at which we can eat it lets us grow way more than the average person even a few generations back.
Why he white? Jesus was a black man. He litrely the king of kings.
no we were 5'11
Possibly it was to identify him. But possibly they made Judas betray Jesus with a kiss because they were f*ching scared of him. Like you would be of a wild animal. They send Judas in first all friendly like to make sure the coast is clear. And even then they all fell back in fear when Christ told them who he was.
Oy vey.
right above your own post fella
No its not no where in the text it says that satan was a angel.
cherubs are not angels
>Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
>Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:
>Maccabees
Brool Story Co.
So he was a manlet?
Your interpretation does not seem convincing, since you make it out of thin air. The clear and obvious interpretation is the literal one.
>The Son of God was a manlet.
Lol you Christcucks astound me.
Great meme. Isaiah 53:2 reads:
"For he grew up before him like a young plant,
and like a root out of dry ground;
he had no form or majesty that we should look at him,
and no beauty that we should desire him."
Did you visit the link as well?
And I never said Satan, I said Lucifer. This distinction is essential.
yeah offcourse there is not one verse in the bible that lucifer was a angel
they kept records but not on the expensive paper that was built to last millennia. Quality paper was so expensive back then that they would write over old documents. Its called a palimpsest.
what happened is that the jews took a corner piece of the cloth that had been damaged in a fire, then found it had traces of paint and that carbon dating put the shroud much later than Jesus would have ever lived.
it took something like 10-15 years for other tests to conclude that the piece they tested was not accurate due to the fire (carbon) and the paint was actually much older than the original shroud.
i haven't kept up on it since they tested the other piece of the cloth. i'm not really concerned with whether it's real or not, although no one has any idea how the image got on the cloth. it certainly was not painted. it was burned at an extremely high temperature at an infinitesimally small amount of time. a laser might be able to create a similar effect, but there were no lasers back in the 1300's where, iirc, they placed the origin from the first carbon dating test. I think the second test placed it much closer to the 1st century but i don't remember exactly.
lol, yeah right
i have an innate mistrust of ''religious artifacts''
a religious artifact can be worshipped as an idol and is only the artifice of man. also, it brings in a ton of revenue for churches or museums to display so called religious artifacts.
>2018
>religion
>CHRISTIANITY
muh kid diddler
This sets a dangerous precedent.
Why do we even care what Jesus looks like?
Shouldn't our emphasis, our focus, be on his words and actions rather than his appearance?
I feel as though this essentially takes away that focus from what's truly important and has us focus more on the worldly aspects of Jesus as opposed to the heavenily aspects.
His physical body is just that, his physical body. It's not "him", it's just his form.
When you seek the form and ignore the spirit, you commit blasphemy in a sense, and miss the point of his coming entirely.
So I would say it's probably best to ignore this, pay no heed to it, it doesn't matter and is simply a distraction from what's truly important.
1 post by this faggot
5'11" confirmed for savior tier and best height. Manlets and longlimbs BTFOd.
youtube.com
Jesus was literally APPOLON
2 posts
1000 priests
100000 kids diddled
Good thing they are sorry about what they did and will be in Heaven.
There's pollen on it from the Middle East and the cloth is from Palestine.
Cherubim are regarded in traditional Christian angelology as angels of the second highest order of the ninefold celestial hierarchy.[24]
en.wikipedia.org
We shouldn't argue over technicalities.
god created various animals, so he like variety why would the cherub be the same as a angel ? , there is no proof text , you played the assumption game
Depends on how you read "literal" man. The passage literally occurs in a list Christ's sufferings, meaning that it is literally one of the effects suffered because of the punishment inflicted upon him through sin. Just read Isaiah 53.
This kills the papist
Is this a merchant? Jesus, it really was like a literacy.
You can never go so far from God that he wont accept you back, glad you decided to leave the fire worship behind.
What's your denomination now?
sweet, I'm 5'10 3/4ths, literal KING OF KINGSlet status, the ultimate perfect height
>Jesus was descended from the line of Israel, from King David. Not the line of the Jews.
How though? His mum was mary and his dad was god.
Heat a statue, drop a clorh on it. No laser needed
im sorry my guy but Jesus was a jew.
You fucks and your magical fucking sandnigger in space, hahahahaha, pathetic sand-LARP'ers. You should all be shot. And this goes ofc for white people, shitskins who worships a shitskin... Well, that makes sense.
It literally doesn't you brainlet.
No explicit images of saints etc in the first three centuries AD because the Church was underground, and all art was coded.
>Liar
mental illness you christkikes have
WE
WUZ
SPARTA!!
It can not be the shroud because jews where wrapped up like a mummy
Verses 2 and 3 are in the context of Jesus growing up and how society treated him during this time. So the way his physical appearance is described must refer to how he looked before the time he was preaching and getting persecuted and killed by the jews.
>Based on the Shroud of Turin
What a fucking waste of fucking time. Is this what christ cucks are up to? They are under assault by kikes and mudslimes and they are playing with fucking 3d printers?
Sand fucking religions need to go. It's peak mental illness.
>44And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go.
>No explicit images of saints etc in the first three centuries AD because they kept the commandments
fixed that for you
This Easter Sunday... the story of Jesus... staring a black man as Jesus with various jews and a literal Satan worshiper in the supporting cast. ... enjoy goyim!
Brought to you by your friends, the jews.