Both Left and Right and low IQ faggots

Both Left and Right and low IQ faggots.

Libertarian master race

Attached: Dumb commies.png (1920x1080, 612K)

>smart
>I should let a bunch of brown retards who will never be libertarian into my libertarian country because free movement of people, goods, and capital

LOL pick one.

>Both left and right and low IQ
>"Both"
>Three qualifiers

No, that's okay, I know who the low IQ retards are thanks.

libertarian and kapitalist
onyl import working brown people

every libertarian I ever met is a virgin.
.

If a libertarian can address the problem of negative externalities for me, I might consider it a real political philosophy.

>be libertarian democratic country
>open borders because libertarian
>brown people with radically different religions and political views move to your country because of economic prosperity created by the white inhabitants
>brown people vote for a radically different government
>no longer be libertarian country

Attached: 1499993179484.jpg (471x350, 37K)

I always love how leftists love claiming their higher IQ according to some studies and conveniently ignore libertarians having the highest average. Though all the averages are low because the groups aren't small.

I'd like to see studies of more rarified groups like monarchists and black enlightenment types. Out of sheer academic curiosity, no expectations.

Libertarians think their fucking gods gift to the Earth, by being so smart yet they don't know what the fuck "ah leppo" is.

>le libertarian = pro-open borders meme
if you're a pure libertarian sure, there's such thing as libertarian conservatism

Attached: lib.jpg (900x1200, 152K)

Libertarians have the classic too smart by half problem. Even genuinely intelligent people like Jordan Peterson who has an IQ in the 150s falls prey to this. That is, their ideas are powerful yet they lack strategic vision and the necessary intellectual ruthlessness to adapt to empirical reality. They can act rationally much of the time but the second you start discussing the long term implications of genetics, IQ, immigration, and demographics they check out. This is why IQ alone isn't enough, you need a near masochistic level of honesty to go along with it.

There are a lot moderate libertarians to thinks markets only become actually free when you internalize externailities, unlike dumb AnCaps. Think of people like Milton Friedman

*dark enlightenment

Also, my writing sucks cuz it's early.

why are communists so violent?

A whole lot of libertarians do believe that though. The problem is the NAP lies at the root of their entire philosophy and ethics dismiss scale as a factor due to their universality.

The true redpilled libertarianism is the pragmatic scale dependent libertarianism of Nassim Taleb. That is, the bigger the government the more libertarian it should be. The smaller, the more controls it can reasonably have (up to a point).

Why are libertarians such soy boys?

Why do you think they gravitate towards continental philosophy? Because they rely on obscurantism to put up the illusion of erudition and intelligence. What kind of personalities needs to do that? Weak ones. And weak people can be incredibly vindictive and dangerous. This is something Peterson has the right of.

They reject analytical philosophy because they are not smart enough to do logic

>2018
>not a National Libertarian

>politically retarded liberals pating each other on the back
Enlightenment shits get out.

Attached: 1516917141277.jpg (572x600, 49K)

Only some.

I others like myself can see reality.

For example in my analysis illegal immigration, or any immigration that gets on welfare is a violation of the NAP as they increase the violation of the tax payers.

As to IQ this is an evolutionary problem.

Bo welfare, and adherence to the NAP will lead to the extinction or low IQ populations and the possible absorbtion or the remaining high IQ sub populations.

That is just letting evolution work.

>t.Hoppean faggot

Hoppe was a blight on libertarians.

As to negative externalities it is a situation akin to the conquoring of Irish and Scottish by the Romans then the Normons.
Both Irish and Scottish had a stringer libertarian streak than most, and the absence of what we would classically call kings and governments.

As such

They resisted invasion and assimilation for far longer by orders of magnitude than any other small state agressed against by a preportionaly larger state.

Essentially their was no one the enemy could force to surrender in the next of the nation, so they litteraly had to conquor every family. And force them to follow the laws and pay taxes.

The Romans litteraly gave up.

Libertarian is one side of another axies stupid.

Left vs Right
And
Libertarian Vs Authoritarian

This is why you MUST view voting for any expansion of state power against the citizens as a violation of the NAP.

A true libertarian would have no problem assassinating registered leftist voters in self defense.

True!

As a side note as a libertarian I see monarchism far preferably to democratic socialism.

In Monarchism the state and it's powers are well defined and the selfish cunt is more likely to leave people alone and enjoy the spoils of his rule.

Hell with the exception of bad kings who tried to make things better. The English and most Europeans were more free under monarchs than today.

That's because IQ doesn't define political views
Also
>berg

libertarianism =/= liberalism

Gary Johnson is NOT A LIBERTARIAN!

The only good Libertarian choice was McAfee. Who answered all the foreign policy questions very well.

(Paraphrased)
"What is your policy for Iraq and Syria?"

"Why should we even have a policy for Iraq and Syria. Can you tell me exactly what we stand to gain by going over there and killing people? What's the point?
No, we should pull out, defend out boarders and leave the world alone."

I'm a communist who believes in free markets. Why do people think communists are against markets? My brand of communism accepts free markets

Attached: QaYqtd7.png (645x729, 90K)

What if your daughter wanted to get fucked by a nigger? Thats not an NAP vio

>only smart people share my oppinions
this is hilarious and pathatic and the same time