Well Jow Forums?

Well Jow Forums?

Attached: 6117F4A1-8471-4A7D-A64A-029558F2E5F1.jpg (960x694, 83K)

Shall not be infringed.

kike

Attached: 1458485274325.jpg (597x590, 60K)

if the government "took cars away" it's infrastructure and economy would fall apart. it's an entirely different set of circumstances, as the government needs us having access to our transportation. by contrast, it would inherently rather us not have access to firearms with which we can control and fight back against (((THEM)))!

so this is a classic false equivalence, all day long man.

(((Horowitz)))

Opinion discarded. Also none of these gun laws are gonna matter in a few years thanks to 3d printing technology.

Attached: fs.jpg (598x398, 26K)

I’m confused with these statements. Are people actually allowed to purchase guns without a background check and license? It Illinois, we go through both.

Please move here. This is the only needed argument that not even half amerifatts get

Well let's see. I want to buy a Twingo, or a ute (those Australian things), but requiring a license, registration, and all the import rules and other bureaucracy, it's impossible for me to get it unless the manufacturers make it here, which they never will. So yes, the government did take away my cars with licensing and registration.

Attached: guns like cars.png (1217x246, 58K)

>but we can't do IDs for voting cuz niggers

>cars are specifically mentioned in the Bill of Rights

Illinois is one of the most cucked states as far as guns. Here in AK you can buy a gun on the street corner with no background check or nothing, and it's perfectly legal.

Pretty sure you just need a state ID to buy rifles and shotguns.

Remember when you have to register and insure a car to be only used on private property? Yeah niether do I

>our

Jews are, historically, not American. his opinion is worthless

This
/thread

Roads are maintained by the government and driving isn't a constitutional right

3d printed technology? How about a couple of pipes from the hardware store and a nail?

When liberal arguments go wrong.

Attached: 1518397030919.jpg (672x935, 76K)

The government should suspend everyone's drivers license to end drunk driving

Remember ever driving in a private road?
Neither do I.

I can't believe those people seriosky think those comparisons are analogous to the 2A.

Plenty of toll roads are privately owned

In many less populated states, you just need cash. I went to visit an old college friend in Wyoming and they had a drive through pharmacy-pawn shop-liquor store. I wish it was a joke.
You could pick up your anti-depression meds, half a gallon of jack, and a box of shells. The old man who ran the place had to know you (Wyoming hates anyone who wasn’t born in Wyoming) but zero paperwork.
I’m pretty sure you can still buy long guns with a simple check to make sure you’re not a wanted felon.

I don't remember any constitutional amendments about vehicle registration.

his magazine is upside down

thank you, leaf.

This leaf wont be raked

facebook co m/visitwyoming/posts/10151129373043506

>Nearly 1.3 million people die in road crashes each year, on average 3,287 deaths a day. An additional 20-50 million are injured or disabled. More than half of all road traffic deaths occur among young adults ages 15-44.

Common sense car control when?

License and registration is unconstitutional nigger . My mode of travel shouldn't be required to be state approved

Your mode of transport is of no legal concern unless you are making money faggot. Do some research.

>plenty
I don't know man, I know very little and small ones.

The point is that you shouldn't need a license to own anything.
The lincenses are so you can use them in public space.

>Cars = Guns
cool fallacy

I agree the government went overboard with the regulations on driving. My home state of NY has pretty much banned tint for everyone who isn't an elite. But requiring a basic state-issued permit which shows you understand how to use the road system isn't terrible imo

Wow, would you look at that. An original thread for a change. Who'da thunk such a revolutionary and unique thread concept as MUH 2nd AMENDMENT would be posted on Jow Forums/pol/ of all places. Good job OP. Bump

Attached: 1498179311862.jpg (691x625, 236K)

Remember when requiring an ID to vote was considered to be a way to disenfranchise minorities from voting?

Justin you wouldn't be trying to prevent minorities from owning guns would you?

Cars should be a constitutional right too

Driver license and registration is a cash grab by the government nothing more

In Kentucky its the NICS and a 5 day wait for handguns unless you have CCW . I can't remember for long guns because I haven't bought one in a while seems I was in and out that day though.

Based leaf

Attached: 1360721898997.png (351x440, 340K)

(((horwitz)))
Do those fuckers ever stop?

alcohol prohibition, cocaine etc

>private road

Attached: image.jpg (547x402, 37K)

We already have that...

>license and registration
THIS JUST IN: If you drive without those things, they WILL take your car.

Attached: pooja.jpg (967x540, 78K)

No. Not until we are all dead or enslaved.

Motherfucker should try living in California and practicing his 2nd amendment rights. No new pistols on the roster in over 10 years, "assault weapons" banned, and active confiscation if you're declared depressed or "dangerous".

Also, this fucking idiot should consider "HOW THE FUCK DO I REGISTER 300 million guns especially since I don't even know who has them?"

Canada tried a registry a few years ago -- turned out to be a fucking never ending hole.

In the US, only a handful of states have maintained a registry, and NONE of these registries have had an ounce of effect on crime.

It is a cash grab, but in this case I would argue it is a good one. Assuming (big assumption) that the cash so generated is used to maintain and build infrastructure the cars use then we have a very good example of those who consume a service paying for the service. Which is how it should work.

European peasants got curbstomped for 2000 years by their own Kings because they had no way to fight back
Why are americans giving up the one Thing that evens the playing field ?

Cars aren't a constitutional right

This faggot does realize they actually come and take your car without that stuff right

all shall not be infringed means is shall not be infringed by the federal goverment, state laws are fine

i know right. Almost every government is increasingly authoritarian.

Remember when driving was a privilege granted by the government but owning a gun was an unalienable God given right?

Me too.

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

Lmfao why would the government confiscate cars for any reason?

Meanwhile people are literally calling for guns to be confiscated as we type.

AKTUALLLY....

You will not be allowed to drive your own car in 2040.

Source: Loominatees.

Attached: 999].jpg (1024x988, 416K)

pretty sure you DO have to register your weapons when you buy then in US.

They should be

Honestly I guarantee if the founding fathers knew about cars they'd have made them a constitutional right

Rekt

Attached: IMG_0543.png (750x1334, 162K)

Depends on the state most do not require it

>posting his own tweet
sad

How about no you feckless idiot. As the Supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution supercedes all state laws. There’s actually an amendment stating that in the Bill of Rights you cuck.

You don't need any of that stuff if you keep your vehicle on private property. In fact, you can take it on public property (transport it) you just can't use it on public property (roads).

Basically the analogy would be what CCW is today with the addition of having to register the specific gun you will CC as well.

Other than that his analogy supports owning any weapon - bazooka or full auto - that you may desire. Just can't use it on public roads without a special license.

the government taxes me to drive

that's not freedom, that's theft

>Are people actually allowed to purchase guns without a background check and license?
Private sales. There are no stats on this. However, as paranoid as sportsmen are, most will not sell to someone they do not know/trust with a firearm. Sure dumb people do, but I am talking about sportsmen who know their rights and respect them.

The problem is coons in big cities trading hipoint handguns for drug money. There is not a problem with legislation, there is a HUGE issue with enforcement of our existing laws.

Our current issue is a great example. Nich Cruz had the legal right to possess firearms. Why? Because the police failed to intervene EVEN when told that he was a liability. Even the FBI failed.

Attached: no problem.png (2092x548, 1.18M)

then why aren't horses a constitutional right?

why do you mutts keep using this picture as its some sort of KKK meetup?
It's literally a spanish tradition.

>neither do i
It happens all the time. Get caught speeding for a frivolous number over the limit 3 times in a year and kiss your license goodbye. That is one example of many in one single state.

With guns, once they take them you will overwhelmingly most likely never get them back.

Thank you, have a nice day.

Yea keep thinking that the government doesn't give a shit if it's on private property they want their registration money one way or another

It's a Christian tradition. Actually.

>Plenty of toll roads are privately owned

Yes, by relatives and friends of the congressmen that approve them, since the state owns 99% of the supporting infrastructure. Here in Texas the state even pays for the maintenance and provides profit guarantees, so they are de-facto government owned.

Remember when the Government "took away the jews" by gassing them with Zkylon B?
Pepperidge Farms remembers.

Where's my simple to maintain small pickup truck?
What about a stripped down coupe with a big block pushing 440 horses that is actually affordable?
NA diesel that gets 80mpg?

Regulation is killing the automotive industry and that's actually a pretty good analogy of what will happen to firearms.

There will be a paper record of your transfer from a Federal Firearms License (FFL) holder--basically any gun shop. It varies by state if you're required to record transfer between individuals. So in that sense it's not a nation-wide gun registry, and there is no guarantee that you will still be the owner of the gun on record when the government decides to go looking. In the end, it's a good thing that some underpaid jew can't look up who has what guns on their computer screen.

I have about a dozen cars that aren't registered on this farm. No raids so far.

>state law trumps the "Supreme Law of The Land"
Shut the fuck up you know nothing cuck faggot. When we have a thread about refugees or scat porn you can chime in with your two cents.

3d printing? How about an 80% lower and a fucking drill.

My dad and love Aussie cars especially the muscle cars. He's bringing a 73 Ford Falcon XB down from a friend in British Columbia. Purchase and shipping from Australia was to difficult. Should be a fun build. If you can find the car in Canada or arrange for it be shipped to a dealership there its much much easier.

And what happens when you try and register it later on for a sale?

What a terrible argument.

Do liberals not realize how absolutely fucking retarded this "DURRR cars are regulated why can't guns be" argument is?

You don't have to have a license/registration to OWN a vehicle, nor do you have to have a license/registration to operate this vehicle on private property. You ONLY have to have a license/registration when you are on public roads.

If the left wants guns regulated like cars, that means you are free to own a gun and use it on your private property; no registration/licensing required.

Attached: 11363990_790390367737615_1385203513_n.jpg (382x327, 27K)

Remember the constitution clearly stating that the right to drive a car shall not be infringed?

Neither do I.

We don't need license and registration to buy or own a car, only to drive them on public roads.

If you want us to be licensed to public carry, open or concealed, fine. But past that is where I draw the line.

>Remember ever driving in a private road?
Yes, I live on a private road owned by our homeowners association and I can drive anything on it with no license or registration. Drive out of our neighborhood and you need to.

Because you are both victims of the Bill of Rights. The constitution works as 'if the government is not given the authority then it does not have it'. Basically, everything is a right until the government is granted power over it.

This was an issue with those that opposed (and it took years to pass) the Bill of Rights. Those who argued against it said 'if you spell out rights then in time people will come to believe that you only have a right IF the constitution specifically grants it'. The compromise was the tenth amendment, but you can see who looks like they were right by your own statement.

remember when they took thee roads that your tax dollars and your fathers tax dollars and your great grandfathers tax dollars paid for and turned them into toll roads?

Attached: 1522368810501.jpg (720x720, 69K)

You typically already need a permit to carry a gun.

But to humor op, I could deal with needing a gun liscense, if all the gun bans were removed, and it gave me access to automatics without liberals bitching.

Didn't they just do that with those new VW cars?

Why am I selling?

>all shall not be infringed means is shall not be infringed by the federal goverment, state laws are fine
>state laws are fine
One user pointed out how the Constitution supersedes state law Im point out your faggotry

another fucking jew.

Attached: gun_control_jews.jpg (898x546, 153K)

FPBP

Which is how it should work. License for public carry (one for concealed, another for open, perhaps another for different types - sort of like we have types of licenses for CDL or motorcycle, etc). No restriction on ownership other than that.

Uh, actually government regulation trying to make cars safer did. Forced safety standards completely ended the affordable lightweight sportscar by making it so only top tier engineering and expensive materials could keep a car lightweight and crash resistant. Everything else is a 4000 pound bar of soap. ALL cars had to be "safe", no choice involved.

This was the car equivalent of banning sharp edged, evil black rifles and requiring traditional wood furniture. Some retards said "so what, it still goes from A to B, this doesn't affect law abiding people". People who care and actually visit race tracks, something you might not have known is legal, possible, and affordable for the average man (a track day costs less than a car payment), DID notice. The feds only make exceptions for kit cars that can't be dailied in every other state. Meanwhile, "cucked" brits are driving ariel atoms to work.

However, you can still ride a supersport motorcycle that's mechanically identical to the machines used in WSBK races without a helmet. AMERICA FUCK YEAH.

Attached: 1494343466279.jpg (568x467, 61K)

Attached: 1514234860522.jpg (800x850, 74K)

(((Horwitz)))

Its always the Jews.

nope that's a pouch to catch the brass. his upper is chambered for the p90 round, and its brass drops out of the mag well

Remember when the government told me which car i was allowed to own.

Neither do I.

Shall not be infringed.

Bill of Rights.

I remember, (you are not allowed a f1 car or tank on the road)