RACEMIXING

>2018
>Still 0 proof race mixing is bad

is that board even trying

Attached: br.png (908x870, 937K)

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/image/rKYNoaKrxqG_nKyNtG0-cQ/
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>"engage me in conversation!"
>"take me seriously!"
Kill yourself, anti-white.

not an argument

Attached: c9f.png (500x470, 20K)

>an argument
The thing with anti-whites is that they don't have arguments. What they have is justifications for White Genocide. He is justifying genocide.

Racemixing isn't common (less than 10%) in the US.
It's not a danger. Grow up.

agree with OP. send 3 million male niggers and abos to israel and let them put their dicks inside jewesses. sjws and leftshits agree with the alt right and Jow Forums that israel is too racist

Attached: abos_israel.jpg (700x717, 149K)

doesnt that only make it question of time?
and 10% fucking high

If race mixing is good, why are the Jews so much against jews racemixing if it includes themselves?

Attached: 1514957501620.jpg (794x870, 135K)

Any crossing of two beings not at exactly the same level produces a medium between the level of the two parents. This means: the offspring will probably stand higher than the racially lower parent, but not as high as the higher one. Consequently, it will later succumb in the struggle against the higher level. Such mating is contrary to the will of Nature for a higher breeding of all life. The precondition for this does not lie in associating superior and inferior, but in the total victory of the former. The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel, but he after all is only a weak and limited man; for if this law did not prevail, any conceivable higher development of organic living beings would be unthinkable.

The consequence of this racial purity, universally valid in Nature, is not only the sharp outward delimitation of the various races, but their uniform character in themselves. The fox is always a fox, the goose a goose, the tiger a tiger, etc., and the difference can lie at most in the varying measure of force, strength, intelligence, dexterity, endurance, etc., of the individual specimens. But you will never find a fox who in his inner attitude might, for example, show humanitarian tendencies toward geese, as similarly there is no cat with a friendly inclination toward mice.

Therefore, here, too, the struggle among themselves arises less from inner aversion than from hunger and love. In both cases, Nature looks on calmly, with satisfaction, in fact. In the struggle for daily bread all those who are weak and sickly or less determined succumb, while the struggle of the males for the female grants the right or opportunity to propagate only to the healthiest. And struggle is always a means for improving a species' health and power of resistance and, therefore, a cause of its higher development.

fug why is so beautiful Jow Forums?