What is wrong with social democracy?
To me, it seems like the best of both worlds. You get the positives of capitalism without giving corporations total free reign to fuck you in the ass for profit. You are assured a decent living, essentials to live, and opportunity to advance but you're not taking people's property by force or bringing everyone down to the same level. What's not to like in a homogeneous productive society?
Nothing if Jews do not exist
thisx999,999,999,999
Because social democracies are run by leftist faggots that open the floodgates to millions of niggers and sand niggers who come not to work but to take gibs and rape women
The downside is that the idea that the corporations are regulated for your benefit is a ruse. Instead, you are regulated for their benefit.
>You are assured a decent living, essentials to live, and opportunity to advance but you're not taking people's property by force or bringing everyone down to the same level.
How are the weak supposed to die off if they don't have to compete for a decent living. Not natural. Will only cause problems, user. Failure is as necessary to society as success.
Nothing. Unfortunately the politicians don't seem to get it.
This man just threaded
it doesn't work
nice concept
b-but scandanavian model
nope propped up with good old fashioned capitalism
and struggling to carry the ideal
they can't say they were wrong.