If you were trapped for on a deserted island indefinitely with your sister. How long would you wait to have sex with her?
If you were trapped for on a deserted island indefinitely with your sister...
Brody Cruz
Thomas Flores
>this is what Peeps dream about
Nathaniel Wright
Never
Sebastian Ortiz
probably a few minutes
Liam Perry
>If it had developed in all its logical postulates, this fortunate connection could have removed Italy from the orbit of the ideologies of French and revolutionary origin and oriented her in the direction of those that were, in good measure, preserved in the traditional states of Central Europe. This development could have provoked a re-dimensioning of fundamental political ideas, but it completely misfired. Therefore the historic Right has left us no precise ideological legacy and developed into a moderate liberalism. When the Triple Alliance came to an end and Italy intervened in the First World War on the side of the Entente Cordiale[48] which defended, in addition to its material interests, the cause of democracy (despite the presence in the Entente of autocratic Russia, which was doomed to pay a tragic price for its guilty politics), Italy returned almost entirely to the direction that she had chosen during the Risorgimento, in close connection with the ideologies and international revolutionary movements of 1848-1849.[49] In addition, the nationalist excuse for interventionism was doomed to be revealed as an illusion, if one considers only the political and social climate of ‘victorious’ Italy, where the anti-nationalist forces had, through their entire term, almost free rein and where no revolution or recovery from above, no constitution of a true Right in legal terms, took place before the arrival of Fascism. In such a climate, what was the possible significance of what Italy gained in terms of the partial territorial payment of irredentist claims?
Hunter Thomas
This is a shit thread.
Logan Gray
Gross. Wincest is for fapping only.
Juan Diaz
Cameron Torres
>Our reference to the historic Italian Right that arose in a parliamentary regime leads us to a clarification. Strictly speaking, concerning what we have in view and which will constitute our reference point, the term ‘Right’ is inappropriate. In fact, it presupposes a duality. Practically speaking, the Right defines itself in the framework of the democratic parliamentary party regime in opposition to a ‘Left’, and therefore in a framework rather different from the traditional one of the preceding regimes. In such regimes it was possible to have, at most, a system of an English type in its original pre-Victorian form, that is, with a party that represents the government (which is, in a certain sense, the Right) and an opposition, which is understood, however, not as an ideological or principled opposition, nor as an opposition to the system. Rather, it is an opposition within the system (or structure) which has the function of rectifying or integrating criticism, without of course questioning the idea of the state, which is in a certain way transcendent and inviolable. Such a ‘functional’ opposition, severely limited in an organic and always loyalist context, has nothing to do with an opposition that can motivate one or another of the many parties, with each one depending on itself and aiming at the conquest of power and the state, if not at the founding of an anti-state, as was the case with the Republican Party[51] in the past and as is the case with today’s Communist Party.
Xavier Miller
>How long would you wait to have sex with her
I wouldnt, impregnate her immediately. As soon as i get daughter/niece out of her kill the old hag and start fucking my new loli.
Jose Foster
Gabriel Hill
James Long
Christopher Mitchell
I just wouldn't, because I'm not sexually attracted to blood relatives and I wasn't raised by jewish propaganda.
Christopher Rodriguez
>This is the way it is necessary to conceive the Right taken in its best sense, that is as political and not economic, not as something linked to an already regressive phase, a phase marked by the advent of parliamentary democracy with the regime of many parties. In this phase, the Right presents itself factually as the antithesis of the various Lefts, almost in competition with them on the same level. In principle, however, the Right represents, or ought to represent, a higher demand. It ought to be the recipient and affirmer of values linked directly to the idea of the true state: values that are in a certain sense central and superior to every practical opposition, according to the superiority inherent in the very concept of authority or sovereignty taken in its fullest sense.
Leo Reed
William Morgan
fucking peeps
Blake Nelson
Probably a few senconds since I already want to fuck her
Christian Cooper
>These hints are already leading to the definition of our reference point, through which it will be permitted to speak, in general, of the great European political tradition, not thinking of a particular regime as a model, but rather of some basic ideas that, in different but coherent ways, have been at the foundation of different states and have never been fundamentally questioned. By an amnesia that is too unusual to be considered natural and should be explained (in the best case scenario, that is, apart from the falsifications and misleading suggestions of a certain type of historiography) as the pathological effect of deep traumatic events, our contemporaries seem to have no longer a living and adequate idea of the world to which has been customarily applied the faded tag of ‘old regime’. In this regard, we are evidently not looking at directive principles but at certain incarnations of those principles that are always subject to attrition, denaturing and wearing out, and which in any case have a certain more or less unrepeatable conditionality. But the contingence, and the lesser or greater longevity of similar forms, which naturally are, at a given moment, situated in the past, does not weigh and ought not to weigh against the validity of the principles. This is the touchstone for every examination that aims at collecting the essential and avoids becoming the subject of an historicist confusion.
Nathaniel Diaz
>We can therefore bring these preliminary considerations to a close by saying that, ideally, the concept of a true Right, what we mean by the Right, ought to be defined in terms of forces and traditions that acted
formatively on a group of nations, and sometimes also on supernational unifications, before the French Revolution, before the advent of the Third Estate and the world of the masses, and before bourgeois and industrial culture, with all its consequences and its games, which consist of actions and concordant reactions that have led to the contemporary chaos and to all that threatens to destroy the little that still remains of European culture and European prestige.
>Please do not ask us to be more precise, because that would be equivalent to asking for a systematic exposition of a general doctrine of the state. In part, the reader can refer to our book called Men Among the Ruins. Greater precision, however, will become clear as we examine the various topics we shall discuss as we proceed.
Easton Moore
Can we have sex before we trapped on island?
Cooper Stewart
Wonder if Chunk makes her deny the genocide of her people while he porks her over the news bench, grease dripping from his brow due to the strain of trying to keep his dick hard while her makeup runs off revealing her actual face.
Oliver Young
Twist: Your sister died in the boat crash and you were having sex with an island goat the whole time, you were just too pakistani to notice.
Benjamin Murphy
which one?