what should be discovered in order to disprove evolution? Implications on worldview are entirely nihilistic. every scientific theory functions in a way it can be disproven if certain facts or theory come out. Meanwhile, evolution, while being the current paradigm, seems entirely unfalsifiable (Poppers prerequisite for scientific theory). like the test for real witch - If she dies she is probably a witch, if she survives she isnt.
Example 1: if it survives its more adapted (ergo superior), if it doesnt its less adapted (ergo inferior). That kind of logic should also apply to human races so if whitey dies, he actually wasnt the masterrace, if he survives he actually is. This is mythology and circular reasoning, not scientific reasoning.
Example 2: "useless human body parts". Appendix and wisdom teeth are considered an evolutionary relic...until few years ago when appendix was discovered to be very usefull for keeping gut bacteria. Wisdom teeth? Idk I still have them.
in essence, evolution is a Catch 22 of science. If some human part turns out to be usefull in the end, you just claim:
1) "evolutionary adaptation" or if you cant find a certain fossil you claim "we havent found it yet but based on evolutionary theory it was there"
2) or if you dont have a certain body part "it died because of evolution", or find a certain fossil "I told you so I FCK LOOOOVE SCIENCE"
same with homosexuality: 1) disgenics since it doesnt procreate and it diminished the chances of survival 2) EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION towards overpopulation of Earth
are not actually scientific terms. science is an open anti authotarian system. todays science is not like a religion, but is a religion. for answer how did we come to this watch this pls.
often, you heard arguments about children born with tail as proofs that species we evolved from once had them. that kind of reasoning is incorrect since the same logic should apply to annencelophaly and people borned with oversized heads, more than 5 fingers etc. yet selectivly it only applies to tailbones/tails
we've literally seen evolution happen in real time, you'd have to be retarded to not belive that the same doesn't happen to humans. also, what do you mean evolution is not falsifiable? It is. You just have to define what it is first, then test it. For example, evolution says that if some individual of a species is more suited to its environment, then its more likely to reproduce. We could test this by putting a bunch of fish in water and a bunch on land and see if one group is more successful than the other. Or if we want the same environment, we could take a group of monkeys with hands and another without hands, and put them in a forest. Evolution also says that species offspring are very slightly genetically different than their parents. This is obviously true. However, if you don't think that the above have any effect over time, then one thing we can do is get a fast reproducing species so we can observe many generations of it within our lifetime. that has been done, and predictably we see large changes, like insects learning to eat the plastic of the cage theyre in.
Jacob Mitchell
nigger, you're not supposed to believe as an adult that you came from an ape and live on a spinning ball. this is just mainstream bullshit to separate sheep from the thinking folks.
