A couple questions Jow Forums

>two faggots respond nearly instantly
... and people still think shills don't work in teams.

Little boys aren't reporting the crimes, go ask most gay clubbers, they'll admit to being fucked their first time by an adult male, they normally also considered it consensual so your data wouldn't reflect the reality.

Statistics on gays and marriage:

archive.is/Uajwi

Science on gays as parents:

archive.is/9sqNr

The benefits of gay marriage:

archive.is/0I0EO

Genetic Evidence of Homosexuality:

archive.is/grwgp

Does conversion therapy work:

archive.is/uPIbi

HIV information:

archive.is/oJS6y

Are gays more likely to be pedophiles?

archive.is/gK3Si

Is being gay a mental illness?

psc.dss.ucdavis.edu/faculty_sites//rainbow/html/facts_mental_health.html

Attached: GayThatsOk.jpg (940x627, 94K)

Your links are literally the top pages on google searches and you’re not even answering the threads question you stupid fucking sodomite

>how do gays destroy the sanctity of marriage?

they don't

are there any studies that show gay parents are worse for children?

yes, and they all have methodological issues that invalidate their data.

is there a book or source that explains the downside of single mothers nicely?

I have no idea.

Attached: dumb.jpg (500x375, 24K)

>are there any studies that show gay parents are worse for children?

Attached: 1522686982379.png (963x910, 70K)

1. A non-negligible number of respondents were miscounted as having been raised in LM or GF households. The sources of these potential errors—which we estimate to exceed one-third of Regnerus’s subsample of LM and GF—were the inclusion of individuals whose highly implausible responses to other questions call all of their responses into doubt, individuals who reported living in these households for a very short period of time, and individuals whose responses in the calendar data were incompatible with the original categorization of being raised in a LM of GF household.

2. A number of other methodological and modeling decisions made by Regnerus—decisions that have plausible alternatives that at minimum should be checked to assess the robustness of the patterns—appear to artificially inflate the differences between LM/GF and IBF households.

3. Once corrections to these potential coding errors and alternatives to these methodological choices are made, the putative disadvantage in the outcome profile of respondents from same-sex parent families (both single-parent LM and GF house- holds and two-parent LM and GF households) decreases dramatically—with some of the remaining differences not ‘‘sub- optimal’’ (e.g., whether or not the respondent identifies as entirely heterosexual and the number of other-sex partners) or a function of one or two influential cases.

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049089X1500085X

tl;dr the researcher intentionally misclassified the data to make gays look worse

Attached: GayCake2.jpg (480x480, 57K)

Everything you just posted is an opinion, nothing proves the data is bad, it's just the opinion of that homo group you posted.

Lol yes it does. He classified kids as being raised by gay parents who, by his own data, never lived with them. Over 1/3 of his data set is pollution. That's not really an opinion unless you think gays have mind-waves that hurt children from afar.

88 out of 248 of the respondents that were counted as "Parents are of the same sex" responded that their parents were never in a same sex relationship while they were living with them though they had same sex relationships while they were growing up, ie their parents divorced and they ended up with the straight parent but they were still counted as having parents of the same sex

Source
>prc.utexas.edu/nfss/documents/NFSS-study-design.pdf
>a. Parents are of the same sex
219 active and 29 withdrawn panelists, from Page 3
>prc.utexas.edu/nfss/documents/NFSS-codebook.pdf
>S8 Did you ever live with your mother while she was in a romantic relationship with another woman?
40 said no, from Page 4
>S9 Did you ever live with your father while he was in a romantic relationship with another man?
48 said no, from Page 4

If you conducted a study saying that gays were wonderful parents and 1/3 of the kids in your study were raised solely by straight parents I would say that study is garbage too.

Attached: brainlet4.jpg (635x631, 45K)

>unless you think gays have mind-waves that hurt children from afar.
Isn't that what T.V. programming is?
This doesn't count?

Attached: 1498090975766.png (711x458, 309K)

>jumping through hoops this hard because he likes taking it in the ass

Wew lad

>how do gays destroy the sanctity of marriage?
Look up gay infidelity rates. Gay males in a relationship are practically guaranteed to cheat, like 70-90% of REPORTS say they cheat, so finding a gay partner that won't actually cheat on you is like finding a needle in a haystack.
The problem is that the sanctity of marriage was already destroyed by no-fault divorce and sexual revolution, women thinking that sleeping around with multiple partners makes them "empowered like men" instead of viewing promiscuous men as degenerate and moral turpitude.
>are there any studies that show gay parents are worse for children?
well you'd have to let children be raised by gay parents one, putting them at risk to fulfill your science project. and whatever research and report you do would be denounced by the fags as homophobic and unscientific hatespeech anyway
>is there a book or source that explains the downside of single mothers nicely?
read practically any psychology before the hippy faggots took it over. the father fills the role of lawgiver to the children, introduces children to the idea of the society outside the family being governed by rational laws the children have an obligation to fulfill.
Dads are supposed to communicate and enforce the laws of the macrocosm society in the microcosm of the family, while Moms are supposed to be the loving nurturers.
Children don't really fear punishment from the mother like they do the father; and if mom is super mean and strict and kids DO fear her, then that just fucks up the kids in a different way because that imposes on what should be as unconditional as self-love.
The legality of abortion also fucks this up, because when children learn what abortion is they have to confront the possibility of being aborted, come to terms with the idea that their mother could have killed them before they were born and it would have been her "right" to do so.

What we've ended up with as a result of all this is children without fathers who are basically criminals as juveniles.
Or children with asshole moms or moms who support abortion, children who end up autistic or neurotic because they never had real love from their mother.

>yes, and they all have methodological issues that invalidate their data.
see this is how you know fags don't argue in good faith. like most lefties, they just insist that anything that disagrees with them is 'debunked'.
>Yeah that ALL have methodological issues (I won't go into detail on what those issues are, just trust me, the messenger is homophobic and racist and literally a nazi don't listen to him gimme all those little bois to groom)

Gays never have been and never will be part of a nuclear family. A child needs a mother’s compassion and a father’s guidance. Two mothers is wrong and two fathers is worse. You can’t teach your son how to subdue women and act “manly” while you yourself are taking it up the ass by another man. Gays are completely unnatural and should be a genetic dead end. Don’t push this shit on our kids.