Everything you guys said about feminism making women more aggressive is true. There is a woman with blue hair around my workplace stalking me. She has been asking my coworkers for my phone number and my next shift. She tells them that I understand her, and that we'd be perfect, but she's never even spoken to me.
Apparently she also has lesbian tendencies and that's why she's stalking me. Gross!
My coworkers have been telling me all about this woman, and it disturbs me.
She even told my coworkers that she's willing to date whoever I'm dating just to date me.
I don't want to be some fujo's futa fetish (tm) with some polyamorous bullshit.
I'M NOT *THAT* KIND OF LEFT-WING ANARCHIST!
I'm no hippie. If it ever comes to trading blows, I will definitely pick up a gun and fight for socialist municipalism. Feminist social justice isn't a priority, and I shouldn't have to participate in relationships i don't just to stay "tolerant" in the eyes of hippies.
Everything you guys said about feminism making women more aggressive is true...
Chinese woman with a white man.
ok
Spbp
>I will definitely pick up a gun and fight for socialist municipalism.
And you will die within minutes with no one to commemorate your sacrifice or to even remember that you lived. Your body will be stepped over by freedom loving Americans, and none of them will even look down to look at you, let alone give you a proper burial. Feral dogs will pick your bones clean, scatter them randomly around, and shit out what's left of you once they've exhausted the only real source of value you've ever had - a dense collection of consumable meat and fiber.
>overthrow the bourgeoisie with me
Sorry, commie cunts get the bullet too. Didn't you watch Full Metal Jacket?
you have to man up and fuck her for 48 hours straight that will make her political view disappear and align with yours.
>1 post by this ID
You think you can scare me with that vapid rhetoric?
Like you would know anything about freedom being too busy jacking off to parasites like Murray Rothbard.
Private ownerdhip is nothing to me but the right of individuals to behave exactly the same way states do. That's not freedom.
Pretense in the very same regard as state sovereignty.
>vapid rhetoric
Oh, I see, you think you're smarter than you are and you're trying to troll Jow Forums. Cool, well, later.
But why, comrade?
Absolutely not.
>you think you're smarter than you really are
Right. Sounds like a bunch of pretentious boot-licking nonsense to me.
Didn't even bother coming up with any kind of response to criticism against private ownership being farcical.
>private ownership is not freedom
why don't you crawl back to your gay dystopian /leftypol/ board? you might get some sincere replies there
Because sending commies to the big collective in the sky is one of our family traditions.
This. I trained a hardcore NPR Bernie-bitch to sieg heil when entering and leaving my house. The secret? Orgasms. At least three a day for a week. The mind control power of the female orgasm is the greatest whitepill. There's hope boys.
This is some pasta-worthy shit right here.
>Get bluehair's number
>Set something up
>record sexytimes with hidden laptop, 10$ throwaway phones, webcams and whatever for safety reasons.
>Throatfuck and rawdog anal
>Release vids in the event she cries raep.
you write like a home
But I want nothing to do with her.
Why do you assholes always talk about bullshit like this?
I don't want to fuck her, I just want her to fuck off.
>pic related
Can you explain inelastic demand to me?
I'm curious.
Oh, I'm also curious about the Irish Potato Famine and the famine in Bengal.
Could you explain those to me too?
Dude you're never going to get to hang a commie from the rafters.
Right Wing Death Squads are a meme.
Might as well make the best of the situation and deep dick her while jamming out to some fashwave.
>Not wanting to be the dude in the middle of 2 chicks getting down
You might wanna ask around there instead of here.
audibly kekked. best post of day on Jow Forums
>Right Wing Death Squads are a meme.
Oh, then it should be relatively easy for me and my comrades to go grassroots and to try to build an anarcho-syndicalist commune without having to fight anyone. And we can just exclude reactionaries and tell them they are not wanted around our commune. No fighting necessary. Thanks, user.
Btw, that's Mussolini.
I wonder if I can just go around hunting tankies for fun regardless. It'l be like game hunting an endangered species. That's what they deserve for betraying the Free Territory of Ukraine and the CNT in the first place.
>Gross!
Also nice blogpost
My main intention was to call Feminism out as being sectarian and going too far with this lesbianism crap that a lot of guys may have to get involved in the "lesbianism" too just because of the way they look.
And if you're gonna say I should want to get involved in some psuedolesbian bullshit while assuming someone else's pretense that I'm a girl just to get le dick wet, then you guys are pretty fucking degenerate yourselves, and that's saying a lot, my dudes.
>>>/leftypol/
Go and stay there
So you're a strong independent woman who needs a bunch of guys' advice who spend all day shitposting and posting frogs.
...right.
Moving right along...
>saves country
>gets hanged
commies will defend this level of stupidity
>i cant do what I want with other peoples stuff so im not free
good post bruv
I would pretend, to be a neo marx fag and then tell her I voted for Trump when finished
And I guess communally owned property in which nobody can monopolize the means of production and alienate workers from the product of their labor is inherently authoritarian.
Nope, monopolization of the workplave isn't as completely fucking parasitic as the state exercizing the falsehoods of sovereignty and owning everything and charging taxes within national borders.
Okay.
Nice word salad, dipshit. Did they teach you this at the University or you're innately this brain dead?
this. am i supposed to believe this is in any way a coherent or relevant response to what I said?
>'word salad' is a valid criticism.
Explain perfectly inelastic demand.
tell everyone how property owners bring up the prices of essentials like food when the collective standard of living increases, not because the cost of essentials goes up, but because everyone else has more money now, without regard for whether or not the workers bootstrapped themselves for higher wages.
After all, this is based on the principles of rational self-interest.
Private companies can simply exploit perfectly inelastic demand to accumulate more profit without having to do anything, literally off the backs of the workers, simply based the the virtue of "owning" fields.
Learn basic economics, lol.
>thinks one firm sets the prices in a market such as food
>tells everyone else to learn economics
Selling helicopter rides! For the next 24 hours they're totally free!
Explain to me what material wealth 'Rent' creates. What is the material product of rent? Food? Computers? No. Nothing is created from rent. It is wealth extraction under the same principle that the state owns the nation, and you live in the nation, therefore you must pay taxes.
>Thinks multiple firms are incapable of raising prices in unison to keep collective efforts of bootstrappers as effective as they've always been.
There are lots of people who are killing themselves trying to work harder for better lives, and more often than not, it doesn't pay off.
Productivity in this country skyrockets, and yet wages stagnate, because the workers supposedly have nothing to do with productivity.
No, it's all to the credit of rich parasites.
How do you sleep at night?
waifu
Tits or btfo
>How do you sleep at night
By identifying two things:
First, that most problems faced by poor people in western nations are either by their own doing or the fault of their family. Throwing out a good system that incorporates freedom and promotes productivity because a few slouches ruin their lives and the lives of their children with things like substance abuse and sexual promiscuity is stupid.
Second, that the prices of labor doesn't rise because there is very little demand for unskilled labor. This is partially caused by increases to technology which is a common leftist talking point, but it's also caused by mass immigration, economies of scale, and free trade with countries that have massive labor forces and a low cost of living such as China and India.
Many of these things suppress wages and promote wealth inequality, but also account for most of the productivity growth and increased standards of living we've witnessed in the last few decades.
Something I'll never quite understand about you left wingers is that if someone has something that you don't, instead of viewing it as a goal for yourself to work towards, you instead find it personally offensive. If I were to pontificate, I'd guess you abuse at least a few different controlled substances and are morally and spiritually bankrupt, so you desire material goods to fill an emptiness that can't be filled, but you can't afford material goods because you waste all of your income on drugs and alcohol, and you're trapped in this cycle of misery.
I'VE GOT NO LOVE FOR HOMO THUGS
I don't do drugs or alcohol, and I don't want to. I realized how frivolous and harmful those "comforts are while I was in college, and I decided the only only ethical decision was to stop. It is a waste.
I'm sure I agree with you on that.
I promise I will try to build infrastructure for communal ownership and the benefit of all locals as equals, preferably without having to resort to any violence in its defense from a reaction. I feel that's the absolute best decision I can make in a world like this.
>apo
eat shit and die leftist scum
Of course, it can't work if I am unable to successfully advocate that everyone undertakes education and practice in making responsible decisions for both the self and the collective.
I want to be able to work and enjoy the full product of my labor without any intervention from the bosses or the landlords or the state.
Contrary to popular belief, work is not synonymous with wage slavery.
You should be able to pay the workers directly instead of deferring to the corporate middleman, the gatekeeper for access to labor that makes sure the value of the labor enriches himself and not the contributors within the teams of people actually doing the work.
>Potato famine
since you asked, this was an intentional move to force a migration of an entire culture overseas so that they may participate in the meat grinder known as the American Civil War on the side of the Union. Every starving migrant was another vote and pair of hands to hold a rifle.
if you knew how bad things really were, and who propped up your icons, you would not be communist.
I want to put as much distance between anarchism and communism as I can.
I usually prefer the raised fist, or better yet, the circle-A.
I am very critical of Marx, and everyone who tried to implement Marxism, and I love Bakunin and Kropotkin. I don't think the state is necessary for socialism, rather, I believe the socialism's worst enemy.
An even worse enemy than reactionaries.
>Irish potato famine
MY TIME TO SHINE
the potato famine was brought about by Anglo exportation of all the grain within the country, the suppression of further agriculture, the failing of the staple potato, and lack of any substitute.
It was the actions of a government that didn't give a shite about my people, much like the kike overlords in the soviet who didn't give a shite about russians, ukrainians etc.
unrelated; read Gulag Archipelago
>says advocate
>means force
K. Keep me updated.
Yup.
It was literally external forces telling agrarians who can own their land and food.
If I have to use force in service of advocacy, then I've already lost.
I will definitely try to avoid using force
Most of the agrarians in England and Ireland used the commons pretty well before the enclosures that cause the famine.
It's dictation as to what conditions of ownership are acceptable, even though most commoners at the time hated the enclosure movement, and felt bitter loss and humiliation because of it.
>shitty overpainted concrete crap for a wall
>bad art
>no fashion sense
looks like china from here
Go to hr and make a complaint that you feel intimidated and believe her behaviour shows a lack of dignity in the workplace. They'll sort it out.
I mean, they didn't overproduce, but they got along through life with the commons nicely.
Not great, but good enough. No reason you can't strive for greatness and still keep the commons in tact though.
That's a leftist meme.
Sort of like this image here.
Exactly,
Which is why private property and the ability to grow your own produce is paramount.
Capitalism is driven by the perceived value of the dollar. Socialism is driven by the perceived value of the ideologue. Both end with the same group of people hoarding material resource. Both are sustained by a willing(?) populace buying into the system with their labor.
The state and standing army would unfortunately be required to enforce any form of socialism. Otherwise you'd have militias and rampant libertarianism in the absence of policing forces.
Fear not. The utopian communal living will come back around after this party kicks off. "Tribal" is an accurate descriptor for our future.
Are trying to tell me that I should not be have the right to develop a commons on unoccupied land because you think private ownership is better?
That's dictating what conditions of ownership are acceptable.
British Imperialists expropriated land from the Irish, just as the Soviet traitors did unto Ukraine.
The most important factor of overproduction in agriculture today is the knowledge accumulated in botany and the technology developed to put that knowledge to judicious use.
You should not have the right to develop a commune, as you could be stepping on the rights of others if that is their land.
That's how rights work. They're both ways.
Key word being "UNOCCUPIED", as in nobody owns it yet.
Would I have the right to I join together with comrades and pool together income for a while to buy occupied land for a commons?
Or would that be illegitimate too?
Nice blogpost. Now post tits or Gtfo
>George Washington university
>it's a college kid LARPs as a revolutionary episode
I am not a woman.
I honestly don't know why everyone keeps assuming that.
Female stalkers expressing some lesbian tendencies doesn't necessarily make them lesbians.
JUST
She sounds like a crazy good lay.
Quit being a faggot OP.
Yeah whatever larp now pot them tities or gtfo
Why should I have to have sex with crazy woman who wants to pretend I'm another woman and cheat on my girlfriend to prove I'm not a faggot?
Sounds kinda faggy and degenerate no matter what I do.
No, I'm not a woman.
I don't have tits.
I'm leaving now, right-wing death squad memes are more fun than "tits or gtfo".
I've had to deal with that shit from posting my face on /b/ before, and I'm not degrading myself like that again.
Particularly not at the behest of political enemies.
Move to North Korea, she can't bother you there.
>blue hair
First indicator to run.
Seriously. How someone colors their hair is a huge indicator of how they value themselves
Natural color (no dye): this person has a healthy self image. This does not necessarily mean they like who they are, but they own it and have a realistic mindset about it
Colored their original color due to greying: a slight bit of vanity in their mindset, but the majority of people in western culture have been doing this for the better part of a century. This tends to be more of a denial of the passage of time than any indicator of unhealthy self image.
Dyed different color in “natural” range: these are your blondes that dye their hair red, or redheads that go for pitch black hair. This is where you need to begin to worry. This behavior tends to reflect a desire to be someone other than themselves. It can be fueled by petty jealousies from the past (blondes kept stealing my partners, raven-haired girls were always smarter), or a desire to escape stereotypes associated with their hair color without putting any actual work into improving themselves (redheads are accused of having anger issues, so i’ll Turn mine burnet to look more approachable). They are not 100% gone, but it’s going to take a lot of work and patience to get them to stop running from what they are and accept themselves. Be on the lookout for self-destructive behaviors
Dying a non-natural color: they’re gone. Not only do they hate what they are, but they’re desperate to stand out and be unique in order to validate themselves. They need to be the center of attention everywhere they go and they are not even honest with themselves about it. They will be superficial, flighty, and childishly immature and selfish. These should be avoided at all costs.
Don't fuck her. Never be alone with her. Keep your distance. Maybe keep a tape recorder. Keep on keeping on, and DON'T fuck her.
Work place + colored hair womyn hire = HR fiasco waiting in the wings
I've yet to see one who didn't have a hand in an office shitstorm that ended in the firing of some poor bastard over petty bullshit. Might put you on edge first, but if your bosses have any sense, they'll find a way to quarantine her away from most of the department so actual work can get done in peace.
She's one good white dick from being whatever he wants her to be. Trust me on this. I dated a brainwashed Maoist asian girl and within a month she had made her own NSDAP arm band(her hobby was making clothes).
>How communism works
Wasn't that the book that was just "it doesn't" written over and over again?