Communism made simple

I'm torn between A and B. She should have power over what she made, but it would be irrational for her to have it if she was just going to do nothing with it for instance

Attached: 1.gif (512x807, 469K)

Fascist here.
I keep the flute for myself and tell them to get back to work. If they refuse, I break the flute over my knee.
Then I have Child C gassed.

B gets the flute
A gets a smack
C gets pushed down the stairs

kek

I would give it to the one who offers most money in return because I'm not a moron.

Whichever one offers me the most money.

B. Without B there would be no flute so A and C can go fuck off.

Whoever pays for it.

What a stupid question. B, kamrat.

Property rights my nigga

The answers are skewed for B. Terrible leading ethics question.

Sell it to A. Give B a tiny fraction of what you earned.

>So the communist answer is...
That's the secret. They're all communist answers.

>"Give it to A!"
>To each according to their ability
>Communism

>"Give it to B!"
>Workers control the means of production
>Communism

>"Give it to C!"
>To each according to their needs
>Communism

This is a persuasion technique called pacing and leading. Trick the kids into picking one of the options, and make them feel like it's their own choice. Say you agree with them, and then explain why this choice means supporting communism. A child won't be intelligent enough to notice the deception.

Attached: lillie_consider.png (818x818, 314K)

B she'll trade it for something later

Child B, obviously.
Why would it be irrational? It's her flute. She can do whatever she wants with it.

>take flute
>play dynamite solo
>toss it to B
>remember kids, communism is for FAGGOTS

Attached: coolguy.jpg (500x381, 24K)

Child A gets imprisoned for being a racist
Child B gives the flute to Child C if she doesn't comply she gets imprisoned
Child C is actually karl marx

thread over

>the finished product
>means of production
Retard alert

Give to A just ,the others dont know how it work what will they do.

>this

>people can't be taught to use tools
Please don't be this stupid

It is very simple
>if B made it it she has it and can decide what to do with it.
If i contracted B to make it
>sell it to A and give a portion (let's say i am only the intermediary) and keep 25% of the money for myself.

Also it's "from each according to his ability"

it could be wasted resources

B until he sells is to A or C. Was an easy question.

Attached: 01c3897019775f0e1ad53099fb64374b.gif (540x304, 1.82M)

Just asked an educatoion professional. The response was you keep it.
Literally taken by tge state and nobody gets it.

Yea child C gets the flute, child A and C maybe gets the option to buy it. If they can't afford it or child B decides not to sell it they both can go suck on a bag of dicks.

Never mind that boring flute, I've got a nice big organ all three of you little girls can play with at the same time.

Attached: sickos.png (152x254, 40K)

Workers mine resources, and construct a final product. Explain why it should not collectively belong to them.

Eh wait I meant child B gets the flute the one who built it.

Clearly, the flute is a personal property of B and I have no power over it.

Also let me explain why this pic doesn't work. See here's the thing Ik you're trying to make child B the commie but here's what I got to say. Most people work for others using equipment or skills from their boss these are things they would not have had otherwise. Child B is actually a capitalist when you think about it.

I'm not an expert on Marxism, but wasn't that quote meant for a utopian society where people seeked out work not to survive, but for their own enjoyment?

B is obviously most fair.

Serious answer is this tgough.
>humoring the arguments and attempts at bargaining of children.
nope

Had sage in the name sorry guys

Because they get the resources and sell them? Their problem what they do with those resources, they might even decide not to sell it either. But then why did they mine it up in the first place? If they do sell it to another worker, that worker owns those resources from then on and creates the flute and does whatever the hell he or she wants with it.

Because they did not provide materials.

this

you are actually retarded
Kill yourself sven

Child B. A and C are both so communist their hair is red. Child B took personal responsibility to make the flute, not a democrat. Democrats don't make anything, they demand other people give them gibs. Child A and C are both entitled democrats

And the mine does not belong to them either.

Because if there weren't capitalists at every stage of production motivating them with money they'd stay home and drink until they finally starved to death?

>B
>workers own the means of production
Except that B also provides the materials, which "workers" don’t do.

B is the owner and the worker, there is not employee/employee relationship, they are self employed. The key here is that there is private property which simply doesn’t exist in communism

The real deceit is the idea that we, the people getting asked the question, and the question asker should get a say over something we had no hand in producing.

A and C are clearly socialism and communism

>I'm torn between A and B
im torn between a black hawk and a Huey

A buys the flute in exchange for some of his shit and plays it, B gets incentivised to make more flutes to sell them, C can listen to the music so his life gets a little better too, in the future he would probably be hired to work on B's flute factory.

fuck off

youtube.com/watch?v=tIeEotdOVew

Wrong
>three children are fighting over a flute. Who would you give it to?
the one who wins the fight.

>wasted
Thats sujective

one thing cannot collectively belong to anyone.
Imagine this:

1 collective flute
3 kids

all of them want to play it in the same time? How can they solve this if there is no mediator? They will eventually fight to death until one has the flute.

Otherwise they will need mediator and that's where your system becomes corrupt.

You know what the answer is?
The fucker who buys the flute is the one who gets it.

>give it to
Why would I give MY flute to some faggots?

Attached: (You) suck.jpg (1920x1080, 186K)

>weak appeal to emotion bait.jpg
the kid that would pay the highest price. if you're not willing to spend enough the flute isn't that important to you anyway.

>They will eventually fight to death until one has the flute.
The cream rises to the top. The system has done its job.

Checkmate.

How are you torn? Who cares if it's irrational? She put in the work and resources to make the god damn flute and you have no right to take it away from her in the name of """rationality"""

Grab flute, throw it on top of roof, spank all the children.

>B sells it to A or exchanges it for a service and C learns from B for a fair exchange, so he can survive and sell his own flutes or dies trying.
This is the best answer, prove me wrong

Attached: anti-nigger_potion.jpg (720x480, 44K)

in sweden all the kids get akmeds cock

youtube.com/watch?v=tIeEotdOVew

it's Bs without a doubt so it goes back to B. only insane psychos would say anything else

>three children fighting over a flute. who would you give it to?
either my kid or white male kid

The communist answer is that the state takes the flute, and the flute is then divided in 3 thereby giving all kids an equal share of the flute.

See, it works!

Buy, sale, work

Anarcho primitivism

listen here you massive cuntwaffle, B is clearly capitalism as the one who owns the material can keep it.
she didn't even "take over" the means of production in The first place. It was her property and so she can do whatever shw wants with it
>buy wood
>carve something
>communism
You are literally brain damaged and your shitty thread is saged.

Child B made it and apparently had no prior agreement to give it to someone (i.e. they weren't employed to make it for someone else) so it belongs to child B. What kind of retarded ideology could possibly answer A or C?

>3 children are fighting over a flute which one will get it?

The kid not shown, who shows up to buy the flute, shit on the poor kid, kick the one who can play it, and hires the one who made it.

Attached: C4A72524-7BB6-4A64-8371-74CAE53237F0.jpg (650x646, 260K)

A is fascism

but the question implies you own the flute. so you can keep or sell the flute. fuck those kike kids

but that's not the true communism right?

Fuck off you commie wannabe prick.

A fucking fairytale, just like the ideology

r u guys communists

>B is clearly capitalism
>He thought that the options were meant not to deceive you
ha then

Tell child B to trade it to child A for goods or services she finds valuable. Then tell child B to hire child C to help her with production to make more flutes for other children.

Attached: 1260351350519.jpg (1028x1028, 94K)

the capitalist answer would be to increase the production of flutes until everyone who wants a flute can afford to buy one

Why does this keep getting posted on every board on Jow Forums multiple times a day. This shit needs to die.

The answer is teaching Child A to find something of theirs to trade with Child B for the flute. Tell the Nigger to fuck off.

None of them. The flute belongs to the state, therefore Child B would be compensated for making the flute while child A can play it, but it does not belong to her. Child C would go to a re-education camp.

was b payed buy someone to make a flute, if so then the person who payed for it owns it, if not she ones it. child c and a are comunists trying to get gibs i they didnt pay for it

>hey i see you’ve built a car, cool! However you don’t know how to drive it so I’m just going to take that from you.
>hey i see you’ve just painted a picture, cool! However you’re not doing anything with it and clearly don’t appreciate it’s true value so I’m just going to take that from you.
>hey you got married, cool!
However since having two children you don’t seem to be getting her pregnant so I’ll just be taking her to have some more children.

This

Bingo. If there were an option D along the lines of "I paid B to make the flute" then it would clearly belong to D.

yep, and child C can work until it can afford one

Who's the state?

But leaf, it's the correct answer.

You wouldn't dare say that fascism is the correct answer would you?

>be baguette
>painstakingly hand-craft a boat Over the course of 8 months to enjoy the sea even tho you can't navigate well.
>government Comes
>lol u cant even steer it, we'll just take it away
You supported this.

C can shine the flute for money

Child B should get the flute. Communists are envious cuckolds that should be hanged from lightposts.

Attached: 1522397733697.jpg (1024x629, 62K)

How can a native English speaker type such horrendous English?

If they argued that I then support communism because I choose B, then I would just rebuttal with that in this instance she does control the means of production because she is self-employed. But if this were a business and you were the boss then the scenario would play out differently as B makes a flute for you and you play B for the labor, and then you sale it to A for a higher price to profit from the flute. But it is never established that this is a business so you cannot say that your opinion on this example as anything to do with businesses.