God exists

Demonstrate it please

No.

How do we kill it?
Or reverse engineer its powers?

i bet your all of them, whats your point? kek

I don't believe it
but hey more power to you

Europe and her colonies are dead. Christ is risen.

Attached: 1469840195999.jpg (1680x914, 499K)

you can't have faith and proof that's not how it works

I have been blessed, no god exists

What could I possible want with faith?

I am aware. Now get that rainbow skyline away from His cross.

The point is you're an idiot and the non-breeders are the same as shiteating homosexuals. All relativists are liberals.

Attached: 1390089203368.jpg (1280x2096, 761K)

The rainbow was God's before homosexuals tried to claim it.

What is this shitty picture about?
There is no god in places where your Jewish overlords has come.

I know

I disagree.
Faith and Reason are not opposites, but actually are interwoven with eachother.
A man can know God's nature using Reason alone.

Quick rundown:

Abraham paid tithes to Melchizedek; later, the Levites would receive tithes from their countrymen. Since Aaron was in Abraham's loins then, it was as if the Aaronic priesthood were paying tithes to Melchizedek. (Heb. 7:4-10)

The one who blesses is always greater than the one being blessed. Thus, Melchizedek was greater than Abraham. As Levi was yet in the loins of Abraham, it follows that Melchizedek is greater than Levi. (Heb. 7:7-10)

If the priesthood of Aaron were effective, God would not have called a new priest in a different order in Psalm 110. (Heb. 7:11)

The basis of the Aaronic priesthood was ancestry; the basis of the priesthood of Melchizedek is everlasting life. That is, there is no interruption due to a priest's death. (Heb. 7:8,15-16,23-25)

Christ, being sinless, does not need a sacrifice for his own sins. (Heb. 7:26-27)

The priesthood of Melchizedek is more effective because it required a single sacrifice once and for all (Jesus), while the Levitical priesthood made endless sacrifices. (Heb. 7:27)

The Aaronic priests serve (or, rather, served) in an earthly copy and shadow of the heavenly Temple, which Jesus serves in. (Heb. 8:5)

thats nice buddy.

will to keep going and perfection to strive for. did communism replace that for you?
also are you witnessing your gets?

How to verify if God exist.

1. KYS
2. If God does exist stay with God and if God does not exist come back and tell us.
3. ???
4. Prophet

How many people have come back from the dead to tell us God does NOT exist? Checkmate.

Attached: never-marry-a-jewish-woman-i-love-my-trans-child.jpg (1465x2047, 2.65M)

The scientific revolution was predicated on the Christian belief that the universe was created with an intrinsic order and structure that allows it to be understood by man.

All his life he tried to convince people that there is no God and look how miserable his health was all his life.

100% logic.

>Demonstrate it please

Alright, nothing comes from nothing, so there must have been something, this something cannot bring itself into existence because it would already have to exist before it existed, this is impossible, thus it must have been created by something else, this "something else" is what we call God.

I do agree with that statement, just showing my relationship to faith. There just is no sentence I could tell you to reasonably prove God exists and if I attempt people will believe I am crazy.
pie in the sky man is real

Attached: 987349857398457.jpg (2500x1767, 2.92M)

Indeed

>God exists
God doesn't exist

Checkmate

Attached: 9736458763487.jpg (1280x853, 281K)

...

Attached: 1521677993354.png (491x660, 868K)

Attached: 98734987598345.jpg (1280x720, 168K)

Probably because I know for a fact that we're all trapped on Earth for one month after we die. Karma is also real and its what determines if you can interact with the world. For example Jesus had massive karma so he actually stayed for 40 days and could appear to people and basically do what he wanted. This old lady who died and contacted me and others, only stayed for about a month but was still extremely strong regarding manipulation of circumstances and inanimate objects. After a mountain of evidence, I just received her funeral announcement and it's the day before my birthday.

Apparently a bunch of people know. I was just watching Ghost and in the beginning Swayze is reading a book by Richard Bachman. This was Stephen Kings pseudonym which was nite totally kept secret from the public.

Attached: 8745986734598673495.png (900x1215, 2.01M)

>Karma is also real
Wrong.

God necessarily exists.
The only question is "who is God?"

And the answer to that question is John 1.

Attached: acquinas.jpg (700x6826, 600K)

audible kek

Prove it.

No. You can't say "prove he isnt real". Prove to me God is real. Right now. Go.

see

we all automatically go to heaven and get everything we want and big party.

Nice image. Can I save?

How did pic related happen if God isn't real?

Attached: 36546465.jpg (423x319, 47K)

>God
*Gods

Perun, Yarilo, Dabog, Svarog,...

>proof satan exists

>"are you sure god exists"

*sigh*

No, this old lady used to be some school teacher for poor kids. It's the only explanation of why she was able to come back. She was a total pleb otherwise and kind of just a nasty old bitch. There are other factors as well which makes this phenomenon so rare. Karma was also kept secret and it's true meaning still is. That's why virgins were sacrificed. They never knew who could come back so this was just a shotgun effect they used.

that's what memes are for user
>being so new you ask to save one.

Ok. Given our currently accepted scientific understanding of how our universe was formed, equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been created, and annihilated each other. There is no real scientific reason for matter to exist.

thats extremely advanced theology for laymen

Why are you so sure it happened?

Attached: Slavic_Gods.jpg (800x533, 221K)

sodom and gomorrah

i know everything about karma ever.

The religious must know. Do not worship a man, strive towards the priesthood of Melchizidek, which is without beginning or end, granted by God.

I was being polite.

Is eye-witness testimony accepted as evidence in the court-of-law?

This old lady contacted her dog. So I think that's the easiest experiment. Find really old sick people and take their beloved pets away from them for science. Then watch the animals behavior when they die. I think it needs to be kept secret from them so that's tricky. Maybe steal their pet. The dead need to have a strong fixation on who they contact.

Saying a god exists is like saying drug hallucinations are real life t b h

Attached: 03784598739845.jpg (2048x1363, 1.38M)

Why give him the (you). Just ignore him or hide the post. Low-effort trolls like that should just be ignored till they learn to be better.

If something is written down, it doesn't means it's true.

Attached: veles.jpg (800x619, 135K)

So all those philosophers, they were just wrong? Science has provided solid answers to every imaginable question?

Dumbass.

youtube.com/watch?v=P7ZcKEZh_6U&t

Define "real."

Do you know I've asked that question... probably three dozen times on this board. Never got a straight answer. Not a single time.
That, to me, is all the proof I need.

that's racist.

then what created whichever universe came first, you retard? saying there is nothing metaphysical that was involved in that is like saying game developers don't exist while being an NPC in a video game.

You sound vulnerable and lost. Maybe religion is for you after all

>strive towards the priesthood of Melchizidek

uh no
strive toward the priesthood of Christ, rather
and if that is what you mean, then use that word so as to not confuse layfolk

suppose it is, then what?
and what?

Attached: 9837495734985345.png (766x575, 944K)

First gospels were written around 100 years after the alleged event, none by the eyewitness.

ok
so why are you posting these?

He is probably some form of meme-tier Gnosticism.

>The first Gospels were written in 130 AD
Wut?

Attached: 9567560.jpg (670x350, 49K)

but still written by people who heard them directly from the key eye witnesses

Hes saying that when they were first recorded down on parchment or stone/etc

Ah a butchered version of the Kalam cosmological argument. How have you missed the countless rebuttals of this terrible argument?

>looks at the state of Britain
>doubt.exe

Attached: tumblr_p6keycZcyC1tyd3exo1_1280.jpg (596x596, 65K)

Whats wrong? Just pointing out those who laugh in the face of God with their degenerate lifestyles.

Attached: 97883475687346875.jpg (810x500, 70K)

Sodomites in their true form.

Attached: 98739864756836487534.jpg (3000x2053, 3.8M)

The idea of "God" is the opiate of the masses.

Attached: 4chan1.png (753x478, 72K)

>this kills the atheist neckbeard

Only if you control the idea of God.

>Paul's letters written no later than 65AD
>Latest Gospel written no later than 70AD
They were definitely written by eye-witnesses

>nothing comes from nothing,

non falsifiable

>so there must have been something

non sequitur
baseless on pretext being non-substantiable

> this something cannot bring itself into existence because it would already have to exist before it existed,

all of the above +
logical contradiction
sophistry
et al

> this is impossible,

non-falsifiable

>thus it must have been created by something else,

3rd or 4th stage non-sequitur

> this "something else" is what we call God.

aaaaand a pie in the sky, empty and baseless fanciful absurd leap in logic

The bulk of modern philosophers side with atheism dumbass. Go make your appeals to authority elsewhere

I smoke pot and this old lady contacted me.

My co-worker is a total pedophile scat fetish faggot and he had her dog which started freaking out when she died. Like it was behaving like there was a thunder storm outside.

doesnt

Does it dig holes if i ask it to?

Hmmm... maybe, but I don't think so. I accept the traditional understanding that John was literally written by John, Luke was literally written by Luke, Mark was written by John Mark, and Matthew was written by Matthew. To be fair, only John and Matthew would technically be "eye-witnesses" but historically speaking, they would all qualify as primary sources as they would have all met eye-witnesses and interviewed them.

I wouldn't be so sure about that.
You talk like you were there and saw everything.

The bulk of modern philosophers think gender is a social construct so your argument looks poor for you.
see

i was clarifying what he was saying, not what the facts of the matter necessarily are

yes indeed it does seem the gospels were written first hand