Corbyn and anti-semitism

Attached: palestinian_lossofland.jpg (1562x1068, 230K)

how come you're posting pro palestinian stuff now?

???

Why are you asking that question?

UN with the exception of Israel and USA has been anti-Israel since day 1.

Jew-hating Commies are exactly like Jew-hating Christians. Same schizophrenic shit, different millennium.

you're the UK user right?

It's fake opposition by Jews in hope Orbyn can be elected. They will do anything to get a communist in the Parliament even if that means pretending to be mad at him.

Attached: C2bxCFoWEAENIIi.jpg (794x894, 81K)

Attached: 1521315620345.jpg (691x670, 73K)

Attached: cropped-all-we-need-is-the-right-major-crisis-and-the-nations-will-accept-the-new-world-order-david- (300x156, 23K)

World Trade Centre (WYC) 7 collapsed without planes hitting it.

Attached: wtc-collapse.jpg (792x434, 47K)

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 124K)

Attached: 1521315306187.jpg (472x349, 33K)

Attached: 1521311497941m.jpg (1024x880, 170K)

Am I right?

Attached: 1496838832732.png (557x725, 431K)

youtube.com/watch?v=rz5fZziMWEE

neo-cons plan to start WW3?

Whatever you say about Muslims, they deserve to not have their sovereignty impeded by (((them)))

It's a blatant hit piece.

>Nobody actually believes it
Why wouldn't they ? the labour party is allied with islam.

Im pro palestine and anti zionist, but this user in particular knows why I would ask that question because they are posting a 180 from what' usual. My autistic pattern recognition skills recognize details.

First order anti-semite: a semite who is anti (a system with 1 agent).
Second order anti-semite: someone who is anti a semite (this is more complex as it requires a system with 2 agents).

Always ask people who use the fuzzy term anti-semite to specify whether they mean first order or second order anti-semitism.

Radical left everywhere> Israel: "They're good!"
Radical left in Israel> Israel: "They're bad!"
Immigrants everywhere> Israel: "That's good , accept them!"
Immigrants in Israel> Israel: "That's bad, we must send them to Canada and USA!"

Please Israel, make up your mind and tell us what you want us to do??

I suppose if you spend enough time here it's the only natural result lol

>deserve
>sovereignity
muslims are not a fucking sovereign country you retarded cunt

>but he seems to actually have some policies
Such as?

Also fuck the Jews and fuck the Muslims. They can all blow each other up until the end of time for all I care.

Shills shilling shills. Palestine is controlled oposition. Opt out of this two horse race. There ARE no good semites

israel needs to be wiped off the map

Nationalise and extend the railways, £250 billion infrastructure fund, get rid of austerity, no more wars, among other things. Country does need some fixing up after eight years of "leave it to the next government, we need to panic about the deficit while cutting taxes".
I don't think either party wants Israel/Palestine on their hands, and although I'm not opposed to free trade we really have enough problems without appropriating other people's fuckups right now.

You're retarded.

Corbyn is such a trainwreck. With everything he does, he's growing closer and closer to the erstwhile Soviet dictators he admires so much.

And someone needs to tell those useful idiot Jews about the Doctor's Plot. In a way, it's a shame that Stalin died early. If he'd brought the plan to completion, we wouldn't have all these leftists claiming to be secret protectors of Jews.

The Palestinians had their own near monoethnic state and it was taken from them by Jews.
That is all that needs to be said.

They had no state. They were an Ottoman province that was ceded to Britain after the Ottomans soundly got their asses kicked in WWI, a war they voluntarily entered in the hopes of territorial gains. The Brits then decided to create Israel.

wot

Attached: 1522299121560.png (747x686, 44K)

>Nationalise and extend the railways
Shit Idea (Obvious Reasons)
>£250 billion infrastructure fund
Shit Idea (Economists have stated his financial plan would bankrupt the country)
>get rid of austerity
How?
>no more wars
How?
> among other things
Such as?

That's an awfully convenient time for Stalin to die.

>How?

You can not get involved in more wars by deciding not to go to war, it's the default option.
You can end austerity by spending money on improving the country, this is not complicated. Countries with control over their own currencies cannot go bankrupt.

I'm not thrilled about his stance on nuclear tech and a few other things, but the other option appears to be "stagger along on patch-jobs and empty promises until everything starts properly falling over". This year we have local govts. so small they can't even spend what little money they get given, they had to put £800 million of housing development money back in the Treasury.

>You can not get involved in more wars by deciding not to go to war, it's the default option.

So anyone is free to invade us (further) then?

>You can end austerity by spending money on improving the country, this is not complicated.

Where is the money coming from? I guess you want to borrow it huh?

I agree the way things are currently is a massive shitshow but lets not pretend the (((opposition))) party has anything constructive to bring to the table.

No, because we have a thing called a military and another thing called NATO article 5. Labour's not actually proposing military cuts, but Iraq and Afghanistan didn't get much done and cost us a stupendous amount of money. Why get British soldiers killed just to look like a good American lapdog?

As for the money, raise taxes, actually commit to closing loopholes and borrow the rest. That's the weakest section of the Labour manifesto, since they used some inflated numbers and wishful thinking to sell it to the proles when they should have just accepted the need for downsides. Also "Spend money, improve infrastructure, economy grows thanks to better transport and healthcare letting people work, make more money to pay back borrowing" makes somewhat more sense than the trickle-down economics nonsense. National debt doesn't work the same way as personal debt, despite it making for an inviting analogy.