Why are you against free migration, Jow Forums? According to economists, open borders would double the world's real GDP

Here are my sources.

>Would probably quadruple crime and terror attacks too

Now where are you citations? Oh, wait, you just pulled it out of your butt.

Attached: gains.png (603x419, 29K)

This.

They aren't taking into account how much humans apparently value homogeneous communities. This is in part because the government outlawed discrimination and so we can't find out how much people would be willing to pay for it.

It also doesn't take into account the fact that the people who would come flooding in would vote for less freedom.

>how much people would be willing to pay for it.

Pay for a nigger free zone? Alot!

Attached: 31000.png (400x410, 191K)

Right, Americans and Europeans have been voting in such a libertarian fashion. Oh, wait..

This post again

Attached: apic.png (400x400, 216K)

Compared to the third world. Try to make honest arguments.

Europe and the US have much bigger, much more coercive governments than the third world.

heritage.org/index/ranking

Only whites volte for small government in the US. All minority groups vote for redistribution of wealth.

Third world countries have extremely coercive governments.

Yes lets rape society with "Diversity"

>heritage.org/index/ranking

Into the trash.

Europe and America tax their national incomes at a much higher rate than the rest of the world. America doesn't deserve to be anywhere near the top of the ranking with the highest incarceration rate in the world.

Attached: taxburden.png (603x670, 36K)

I want to see the world's GDP shrink. Especially America's.

Nobody votes for small government in the US, dude. The Libertarian Party has never made headway in the 40+ years it has existed.

You know what a mean, republicans voters prefer small governament relative to what democrats and the fair left propouses. And they are overlming white. The Libertarian party even more so.

The Republican Party just passed a $1.3 trillion dollar spending bill. They're just as bad as Democrats, if not worse.

You post this so many times it's not even funny, the only thing that changes is the woman in pic. You should just fuck off already and think about a new tactic.

that shit has happened in australia. we are told "immigration is good for the economy ad nauseum" and we see a higher GDP but wages dont budge. higher GDP =/= better economy

Attached: austraia.gif (994x636, 232K)

it depends on how will the GDP be redistributed, will wages go up or just profits? because we all know it's just profits that go up.
open all borders and tax the richest 1% for 85% they earn, revert it into public services and I'm in

GDP is not the same as GDP per capita.
This literally wouldn't benefit 99.99% of the world's population.

Depends pretty much from where the migrants are coming from.

Attached: australia.jpg (696x392, 48K)

>will redistribute populations to force wages down so the elite can have MORE money.
ftfy

The rich will never be satisfied until they have ALL the money

yeah, im for peter dutton's proposal to take in whites from south africa because white and similar culture.

I don't think the White race is adequately prepared for it.

I think it is inevitable, and that we had better come up with a plan.

Hope the proposal passes, it's sad only Australia is trying helping white south africans.

Attached: white-african-farmers.jpg (700x394, 80K)

(((Economists)))

GDP is irrelevant; GDP per capita is relevant because it raises living standards.

GDP per capita is not increased by migration.

End of story.

You think free migration is inevitable?

Not just white countries, no nations can deal with chain migration without collapse.

>our sole goal is to raise real gdp
Sorry but this is not the point of life and society. Nor should it because of the negative side effects on culture, race, and western society

i bloody well hope it passes too. decent chance of it passing too.

Attached: chad vs bruce.jpg (1025x432, 44K)

What OP here forgets is that he forgot the Seperate between legal and applied Migration, Illegal Immigration and Third World Immigration.

Applied Migrants hava vested interest in your Country and its people.
Illegal Immigrants do not, they are Criminals from the start.
Third Worlders are way too happy for Welfare to ever help raise the GDP.

No it wouldn’t. It would go up, potentially 50% higher, then it would collapse in the ensuing chaos. Economists don’t know shit about human nature. You need stability to be wealthy. Open borders absolutely murders stability.

If you opened borders, whose interests will the government protect?

Attached: Racewar_ready.png (800x850, 347K)

Because Money is not the most important thing in the World to some. Some people would be fine with being lower middle class or less if society as a whole is good

this.

Also this explains why the Left wins all the dumb votes, because they give simpleton explanation without any in depth analysis.

>according to economists
According to economists, SALT deductions, higher minimum wages, corporate taxes, mortgage interest deductions, and corn subsidies are all bad, so why is it we only listen to economists when they're favoring a leftist/neocon policy?

Why do you retards keep making these threads? Are you so thick you can’t actuallybaccoet that you’re wrong? Just admit that your ideology is total horseshit and that you don’t want anything to do with niggers

Biggest commit vastly disproportionate rates of crime. Why are you a liar? It’s pathetic

It has the highest incarceration rate because of niggers. Why are leftists such unabashed lying cucks?

I would support us taking their entire white populace.

Let's migrate all Africa into your house ok?

This. They can fix their own shithole. We're depriving them of people who can enact change in their nations.

How is it free when i have to pay more taxes again?

#ItsOKtoPauseImmigration

Attached: 11348896-sorry-we-are-full.jpg (800x533, 71K)

those poor poor niggers

Attached: 1467626588982.jpg (472x312, 59K)