"you know what im talking about right?"

>"you know what im talking about right?"
>guest tries to explain himself
>"nonono. Stop lying. Stop lying come on..you know what the truth is"
>guest tries desperately to mindread molyneux and fails. Starts sputtering apologetically and trying to give the "right" response
>"now hold on! Let me get this straight.."
>guest starts nervously explaining how he isnt trying to pick a fight and actually agrees with Stefan
>Stefan verbally beats him down anyway for no reason

Seriously, whats the appeal of this faggot wannabe cult leader again?

Attached: d2ffbd01c3dd0554670cb7057e19db91.jpg (1280x720, 50K)

I don't know, but you've gotta be pretty weak to call in to this guy and cry about your problems.

like all cults it's members behave like castrated dogs around their owner. It's always like this. Any normal person, even if intellectually inept to confront him on a philosophical level, would have told his beady-eyed egg head to fuck off with his manipualtive bullying tactics and would at least try to defend his dignity. But his brain dead following are a lost cause, they are now submissive enough to do almost anything he says.

I only watch him for his interviews, they are fucking great, check out his race and IQ Playlist

are you quoting a specific video?

I only really ever watch his presentations

>talking shit about the smartest man in the world
Fuck off back to your sam harris and peterson memes faggot

I never understood the whole “cult” thing. Can someone fill me in ?

Stefan Molyneux names the Jew so he is /our guy/.
Even if he is or is not a part jew himself.
Anyone claiming different is a shill.

Attached: MOLY.jpg (1356x1356, 351K)

"everyone who disagrees with me is a shill" a childs guide to political discourse.

Sounds like him alright.

Attached: 2018-04-03-203722_707x525.png (707x525, 456K)

Stefan can be absolutely stellar at times, but my god does his pompous attitude ruin most interviews. He’ll basically just talk shit at the other person, and then interrupt them a bunch and throw at accusations while they talk. Then he spergs about how they’re acting irrational after he interrupts them and demands they define every word they use.

His recent video from a caller regarding the drug war is a perfect example.

>i don’t think legalizing drugs is good becau-
>so you’re saying no migrants have ever committed a crime?

>ctrl+f
>0 arguments found

Attached: Laugh at the statist, Izzy!.png (400x284, 230K)

>His recent video from a caller regarding the drug war is a perfect example.
You were right until you said this. So close, yet so far.

It's a stupid tactic used by stupid people to discredit him without presenting their own arguments.

if you send him bitcoin he will save the west

Guy seems logical and smart at first. I watched the skeptic community along with Sargoy. That's how I got roped in to him and heard 600 of his podcasts. Girlfriend gave me an argument to follow classical philosophers instead.

His positions made sense to me until I hit about 300 podcasts and I noticed he was kind of inconsistent. Honestly I'm at crossroads not knowing what to do. I either have the option to argue philosophical/ societal topics in my kik group, read classical philosophy, listen to his podcasts, or read research papers about topics that should be addressed in society. I don't know which path is more efficient.

He has wide eyes. That's about it.

I watched the skeptic community along with Sargoy before him so I considered him an upgrade.

Cults often try to separate people from their family so they won't have any structure to help in need and will be more dependent on the cult and since Molyneux advocates that you shouldn't stick around an abusive family that makes a cult leader who wants to isolate people.

He and his followers worship Natalia Poklonskaya.

Attached: tommonen söbs enkeli natalia vaan.jpg (478x462, 34K)

In what way is he inconsistent?

This

For example he dodaj a great video on mccarthyism. His audience calling in od 90% cancer that makes you cringe

He did* fucking phone

Bro, I think the internet age/politicizing of everything gets us thinking in absolutes far too often.

Molymeme is right about a ton of things, he's also wrong about many things as well. It's an old tired line, but if you find yourself agreeing with everything a person says, you really have to re-evaluate if you're looking at their arguments objectively.

Stefan is a very verbally fluent person who can sometimes make bad arguments sound good. If anything, challenge yourself to pause his videos if you come across something with which you disagree and research it yourself. For instance, he often argues the "women are wonderful effect", which is an effect gleaned from a study that used the IAT to gauge in-group preference. Knowing what I know about the IAT (the test/retest=.6, aka garbage), I can discount what he says about things related to that study, since he obviously didn't look into it well enough.

Tl;dr: He's not perfect, no philosopher in history was and no one ever will be. Take the truths that he puts forward and reject his misunderstandings as you would with anyone.

FRIIIIIIIIITTTZZZZ

Can mods just ban these stupid fucking threads already? Christ it's the same rotation through molymeme, peterson, and crowder. Fuck off back to leftypol with your other commies.

I like Jordie, but the other two are legitimate faggots, and Moly makes us look like fucking incel sperg retards with his stupid shit and genuine cult-leader insanity.

>YOU WASTED TWO YEARS OF
>FERTILITY
>ON A
>BROWN GUY??!!!??!!
>REEEEEEEEEEEE
>DID YOU FIND HIM ATTRACTIVE?
>DID HE MAKE YOU TINGLE?
>YOU WANT A MAN WITH HAIR DON'T YOU... DON'T YOU KNOW THAT MEN WITH HAIR WHO ARE TALLER THAN 5'6 ARE 1/1000????

I am in similar place, I like Stefan overall but as you watch him you slowly aquire the ability to spot the bits where he is talking out of his ass. Hell, i read his book that recently came out and he managed to be inconsistent there too

I feel like Stefan abuses his callers at random. Sometimes he is brutal to people who make minor errors, and sometimes he gives his more egregious callers a really easy time.

Crowder is similar to sjws cause he identifies as a comedian in the same fashion they identify as whatever gender. No matter how hard they try any sane person knows its bullshit to the very core

Jordie is a man who must have put a Jung audiobook on repeat went to sleep in headphones and went into a month long Coma without ever realising it

he is good anything before is almost all related to anarchism. Kinda a waste of time even he decided that. Its good for interviews with scientists and whatnot the call in shows are like steave wilkos sorta occasionally a very good caller with a good question who is somewhat combative comes up if you don't have the time the short vids are good enough. Been listening since about late 2015. Not as much as before but shits good.

Be rational or fucking die!

Omelette du C.Jung

Haha, what's the brown guy thing, is that real ? Story ?

Some Swedish woman called in and admitted she dated a middle easten guy and he got extremely hostile and weird. Everything I wrote out there is pretty much a direct quote. Just search "Swedish woman" on his channel or something. She's like a doctor, so if you get that in the first 30 seconds you've got the right video.

I always come to his threads for the drama and memes, they usually deliver

>cult leader again?
you answered your own question lad, the weak and easily led will always flock towards those who eloquently say they have answers. Molymeme is a intellectual manlet whose whole sthick boils down to whataboutery and not an argument which is pretty funny considered he rarely has an internally consistent argument himself

If you hold strong convictions over anything aside from good-goy mainstream SJWism or Christcuckery you're a member of a cult. That's it.

Always argues the state is abusive.
Advocates for stateless society.
Where only the most abusive will excel.
Thinks this is progressive, is actually regressive.

Molyneux clearly that he only relies on facts, reason and evidence.

Disagreeing with Molyneux means you disagree with facts reason and evidence.

People need to learn to argument.

If you act like a pathetic, soft-minded sycophant around him, laugh at all of his fucking horrible jokes, and allow yourself to be put-down and degraded by him when you call into the show then you look like a little cult acolyte. The guy's also clearly a megalomaniac with a bizarre, and embarrassing, view of himself. I hope you're like 17, and not an adult man.

Get help

Stances on moral issues regarding his call-in shows.

"Hell, i read his book that recently came out and he managed to be inconsistent there too"

Not to white knight for Stef, but you see how this isn't an argument, right? You offer up an opinion with no fact; how about a specific inconsistency you found from the book?

boasted in a 2006 podcast that he would listen while his wife (a therapist who severed contact with her parents to join his AynCap cult) talked to her patients, even interjecting and railroading them into subscribing to his website

after telling a bunch of kids from the freedomain forums to leave their parents, the Molyneux family housed and fed a few teenagers and college kids in the mid-late 2000s

owns millions in bitcoin, claims to know Satoshi Nakamoto and still asks for dollar gibs

Point to an actual example of that happening specifically.

I can remember the exact moment I discovered Molymeme was a fucking retard and that was when he was arguing against the existence of the EPA. Now I don't care what you may think about the EPA as an organization but his reasoning for disbanding it were moronic. He said that regulations were meaningless and were counterproductive since it hindered productivity.
What if there was a spill that affected your health or property? His genius response to that was that those affected could take the polluter to court and get damages. He expects the average joe on the street to personally hire a lawyer and take on a megacorp who no doubt has rottweilers on retainer.
Land all fucked up because it's now covered in toxic waste, sue 'em. Megacorp won't get their act to together and fix the problem because it's cheaper to pay out settlements than fix the underlining problem, Wait for it to happen all over again and sue 'em again!!!

He bullies his callers a little bit but it's funny and he can do whatever he wants, he usually only does it when they waste his time or act like idiots anyways so it's not a big deal unless you're a soft little fag.

He has a haughty view of himself but he's highly accomplished so it's deserved.

You sound like a complete fag.

>b-but men should never have pride in themselves or be mean to others

F-A-G

He's a strange guy.

Attached: beetlepepe.jpg (321x340, 34K)

Attached: 1514742846743s.jpg (100x125, 3K)

Peterson>>>>>Molyfaggot

But she did waste 2 years of her waning fertility on a guy she knew was only a temporary resident—all the while complaining that she wants to find a long term 10/10 alpha male with 300k salary to provide her a family.

You are sensitive. Cry then..if you don't want the truth.

This.

He used to convince teenagers to leave their parents if they weren't parenting up to his standards.

She said literally none of that. She repeatedly stated that how much money the guy made wasn't important as long as he was self-sustaining. Stef made it an issue because he has autism.

He has a young 20s man living with him right now, fetching him things and being a co-host. You tell me.

I find him entertaining but he's very dogmatic and pushy about his views. He isn't open to any differing opinions or views. He certainly thinks he's smarter than he actually is.

His viewer call in shows are awful. He does a good interview with people he agrees with. And his PowerPoints are the bread and butter.

Sounds healthy

You're wrong. She literally stated how he had to make around the same amount of money as her, and she's a doctor. She said she had very high standards. She will hit the wall very soon & become a cat lady because she wasted years on a temporary fuck boy. She did deserve chastising because she's calling into his show complaining about not being able to find Mr. Right.

pls throw phone into river....

>Women voluntarily calls show
>Admits she mudsharked on some POS low value arab, who's greatest quality is his novelty
>Meanwhile wants 10/10 chad swede native
How would this not make the average white male hostile and weird.

the call in show is funny honestly

I hate his weird whisper-yelling when he's really trying to emphasize something he's so incredulous about

Why would it ?
Why does it matter, if her standards aren't met she will either lower them or end up celibate
No need to get weirded out about it, it's literally a fact of life

Stop surrendering women that aren't even yours

Nigga I'm not a chechen, if a girl wants to go out with a brown dude then so be it
You think there aren't uneducated violent pieces of shit among whites ? Get real

Watching people act irrationally who are otherwise very rational is a very weird thing to watch. It weirds people out. Males do or did believe that women would make somewhat rational choices regarding mating. Especially a successful women.

It is far odder than seeing a nigger chimpout. I expect her to have a long term strategy unlike a nigger.

The guests deserves worse.

Go watch it. You're hilariously wrong.

It's terrible optics and makes him look like a fucking weirdo to basically anyone.

>YOU WASTED FERTILITY (weird as fuck comment to most viewers not alread on board with SM)
>DID HE MAKE YOU TINGLE? (weird)
>HE MADE YOU TINGLE DIDN'T HE? (weird; are women not supposed to be attracted to men now?)

Etc, etc.

You live a sheltered life if you think people don't make irrational decisions all the time, and it's not an innate part of our psychic apparatus
You're especially gullible and probably a bit autistic too if you think mating decisions are supposed to be rational
And you have no actual idea of what their relationship was like, and how the dude was. Thinking in Jow Forums memes is probably what made him and you instantly hostile to something that happens a lot and isn't a big deal in the real world

I don't believe are rational most of the time. It takes to much cognitive effort in most situations.
Men go after the most genetically fit women and Women go after the Dark Triad men if their dating rights are not restricted.
Yea it is weird. Tingle's are often something used by women on plebbit as well. They use it a lot when describing why they cheated.

Yeah, internet fucked your mind
Good luck to you my dude

Because non-French men are disgusted and revolted when women act like complete whores.

>people aren't rational so never critique anyone's actions
>you only think like that cause you're brainwashed
>you're gullible and autistic
>you don't know what their relationship was like, you can't judge them

Not an argument.

Agreed. His interviews and truth about videos are great. The call ins are the worst part of his channel

Nothing indicated she acted like a whore. She had a relationship with a foreigner, end of story
Poor social skills aren't an excuse to go full sharia on people because they do not conform to your idea of what is good behaviour
Learn to read through the lines dipshit

no, you are

found the durka

This is why France is a Muslim infested shit hole. Enjoy your honor killings, Pierre.

the call-in shows aren't bad because of stefan, they are bad because the people who call in are pathetic simpletons.

Post links to shows when he acted this way, I really want to see it.

Molymeme has always been about impressing beta males by humiliating omega males. Sad.

But I don't blame him. He is just profiting off of their stupidity and meek character. The weak deserve to perish.

Spoken like a true Germanistanian.

fuck Molyneux, he talks too much and means very little.
Just get to the point, you controlled opposition bastard.

what is this show where he flips out at some doctor bitch about tingles? name please?

Attached: leaf detected.webm (640x360, 1.51M)

>girlfriend gave me an argument
>using tattered hand me down arguments

Attached: 1522618960756.gif (330x166, 2.11M)

Weakness and stupidity.

He's alright when it comes to monologue about something, but he's an overly aggressive prick when it comes to another person or voice being present with him. He has control issues and doesn't seem to cope well with sharing a spotlight.