Reminder that this image is fake news

>Facial reconstruction is easily the most subjective—as well as one of the most controversial—techniques in the field of forensic anthropology

>When multiple forensic artists produce approximations for the same set of skeletal remains, no two reconstructions are ever the same

>There are multiple outstanding problems associated with forensic facial reconstruction.[16]

>The data available to forensic artists are still very limited in ranges of ages, sexes, and body builds. This disparity greatly affects the accuracy of reconstructions. Until this data is expanded, the likelihood of producing the most accurate reconstruction possible is largely limited

>A second problem is the lack of a methodological standardization in approximating facial features.[5] A single, official method for reconstructing the face has yet to be recognized. This also presents major setback in facial approximation because facial features like the eyes and nose and individuating characteristics like hairstyle lack a standard way of being reconstructed

>Reconstructions only reveal the type of face a person may have exhibited because of artistic subjectivity

Attached: leftist propaganda.png (449x586, 183K)

>a man born in 0BC palestine wasn't arab

ok sure thing cracker

You're leaving out that it's based on a random skull they dug up from roughly back then. NO actual certifiable connection to Jesus (who physically left this world).

He was, a Jew, Roger

Exactly, you need a skull to make facial reconstructions and Jesus never left a skull

>British education

Jesus was a bloodline descended from Hittites. Hittites were indo european speaking conquerors in the bronze age and originally came from a population of Caucasian looking people near the black sea.

Attached: indoeuropean.gif (512x256, 40K)

>2018
>people believe Jesus existed
sage

Attached: 1510084343740.png (1292x8757, 3.91M)

this kills the athe*st