Have you guys ever gotten into an edit war on wikipedia? Some faggot ended up locking the page so nobody could edit it. How do you lock a page? How do you win these, because if we can rewrite all the bullshit that calls white nationalists, white 'supremacists', than I feel more sympathy would be drawn towards the redpill.
Wikipedia's leftist faggots
Jeremiah Hernandez
Other urls found in this thread:
Adam Rivera
I think you need to take a seminar.
>Israel, Jews, Zionists Seminar Takeover of Wikipedia Online Information to Implement Disinformation
youtube.com
David Sanders
yes that is irrelevant. Stop complaining like leftist SJWs and help me fix the problem.
Mason Hernandez
What do you expect? REALLY?
Impartiality? On "white supremacy"? It is impossible.
Ayden Hall
I've gotten into a few edit wars. Some wiki admins are insanely biased and even when you prove them wrong about something with many sources, they make up some wikipedia policy or clause that basically means "I can ignore it entirely and not have to support my own argument by the same standards"
Ian Rogers
you stole from us
Isaac Jackson
What, my sweetass get?
Cooper Phillips
Nice
Samuel Rivera
I don't think it can be fixed. It's enemy territory. They say whatever they want to say and then rationalize it with statements devoid of logic and it sticks.
Brandon Ward
They're grade A fuckers.
Ryder Hill
CHECKED
Dominic Howard
Yeah, that's probably why it's advised that Wikipedia should not be used for citations.
I remember one user here claiming that he's been slowly adding fake animals and no one has caught all of it, even 120+ animals later.
Caleb Williams
Nice, but wasted.
Jaxon Johnson
But how can we win against them? How can you edit a page and then lock it?
Carter Collins
Fuck that. Where's your spirit?
Ian Powell
That was a worthwhile get, although not as big as . Wikipedia does have a credibility problem when there may be a subjective opinion involved.
Blake Miller
nice
Logan Gutierrez
wikipedia has a problem
If you look into gamergate and the edit war is gets very clear. Best thing to do is to make the 'edit war' more public so people are aware of the mechanism behind wikipedia and its problem. What people see so far is only the front but not the fuckery going on behind it.
the 'edit war' is the one thing that could breake wikipedias reputation.
Logan Ward
>those digits
By God's Grace, we will win the information war.
Henry Brooks
Why would you anyway? It's fighting in enemy territory using enemy rules and enemy methods, suppose you do it and edit and lock a page, what says that they can't simply unlock it or use it for some media points by saying "evil nazis are spreading disinfo."
John Parker
They can't keep getting away with it. Only Sam Hyde can get away with it.
Mason Lopez
...
David Davis
>we will win the information war.
no, this was already proven over and over again that this is the one thing anons can't.
first thing in a information war is; be quicke, be damn quicke. I speak here about minutes. If a new information hits the surface you have only minutes to make it viral. At this point anons fail always.
Brandon Kelly
Use Infogalactic...left wikipedia a while ago and never looked back.
Julian Ramirez
Wikipedia is funny once you find anti Trump editors through the article edit history. They are over zealous and Jow Forumspolitics tier angry over the election, blatantly very left moderated place. I haven't gotten into an edit war, but many Wikipedia Administration honchos played their card with the GamerGate article years ago. It is hilariously MotherJones quid pro.
Dylan Flores
>Infogalactic
It's a little early to make a judgment on it, but it has promise. Its main advantage will be made known if they are resistant to censorship.
Levi Adams
Better use of your time would be in creating memes to sew distrust in (((Wikipedia)))
Luke Sullivan
more people, on jewtube (pewdiepie), twatter (people with many followers) and so on have to point out the problem about 'edit wars' on wikipedia. Make more people aware of it, so the next convo goes like this
>person 1: i read this on wikipedia
>person 2: the website with the edit war problem? no thanks
or something like this, i guess the perfect meme for this isn't born so far.
Hunter Sanchez
Like what?
Matthew Adams
We need to make Wikipedia COMMUNIST again.
Dominic Ward
Because there is no sense in not trying if it has never been done before. How do you know they'll just automatically revert it?
Julian Jackson
start adding white supremacist to all founding fathers all slave owners ben franklin etc
Aiden Young
But still, we should atleast try. Imagine what we could do if we united everyone on this board and subversed Wikipedia like the Jews are doing to society. They have proved that its effective, so why shouldn't we do the same thing to the marxist encyclopedia?
Juan Robinson
whlie citing race realism hate quotes
get these in first lines everywhere for everyone