euro cuck flag trolls confirmed brit leftypol fags
Jaxon Davis
>leftypol i'll have you know i'm a centrist sitting here in the middle of all you screeching snowflakes cucks laughing my fucking arse off best seat in the house the most powerful card was a /ptg/ btw
It's that time of year again. The bbc is spreading the usual rot about the wage gap. >women earn less for the same work >here are statistics to prove it that take no account of same work done
Charles Cox
it's clear you're not actually paying attention i've heard that explained about three times by the bbc this morning what are you listening to? radio one's news in sixty seconds? i'm assuming they still do that
Why do black people kill each other so easily.? I could understand it if they were brought up in the hood as they say.
Why the fake usa posturing from them here?
Isaac Johnson
put your crypto monies in cobalt futures? idk never even bothered learning how these things are meant to be done always sounded like gambling told myself if i ever learn that stuff i'll learn how to be a bookmaker
boring secrets are rubbish without clues
>Why do black people kill each other so easily.? strange way to put it
Xavier Sanders
The funny thing is that in America this would be classed as "white" until you heard her name.
Driving round shooting teenage girls to death. Who else in Britain does this? Its very strange behaviour.
Ethan Torres
>teenage girl shot dead Fuck these cunts >ivory ban Fuck whit ppl >Eddie izzard - don’t tell them I fucked bull kiddies plz >don’t be racist
Jacob Hill
>as a speaking of fools an there money in need more tobacco
i meant it was a strange turn of phrase to say they kill themselves easily just sounds odd are you a norf fc cunt? i should tell you they kill efficiently down here in that london because they're not workshy northerners
There doesn't seem to be any morality there. Just very strange, whites dont do that except for places like liverpool.
Lincoln Taylor
>>There doesn't seem to be any morality there. london is a wretched hive of scum and villainy never go there not worth the risk you could get bummed or anything desu youtube.com/watch?v=HPuj6UISMhs
Boris Johnson is in the shit. He told reporters on camera weeks ago that Porton Down had told him it was definitely from Russia. Porton Down came out yesterday and said no origin has been determined.
Where has all the political discussion gone from this general? There is a huge amount of major developments on the world stage and very few people here are talking about them in any meaningful way.
Xavier Miller
I could be there in 20 minutes by train. Fuck that though, its such a shithole no wonder the immigrants all go on killing each other.
Aaron Hughes
kek, fuck out of my blog virgin boy.
Brandon Jackson
Fuck off.
Brody James
That video was ok until they started that bloody rapping again. That stuff is tiresome and so unoriginal now
Dylan Miller
She was probably ultra freaky in bed
Camden Davis
that's because boris is an idiot the scientist tell him it's definitely of the type invented by the russians in contravention of the chemical weapon treaty he spins that it into we have proof the russians did it we don't have that at least not from the test they do at porton down it's the job of police and maybe gchq, mi5 and mi6 to work out how they did it maybe our friends in the nsa or fbi might know something i hear they've been putting lots of man hours into investigating russian stuff lately then we have proof give them time good police work takes time
fortunately there are other ways to store electricity as renewable source grow there will be increased demand for the sort of high capacity storage that spurs there refinement i would worry about any kind of cobalt crisis they'll invent a new type of laptop battery before we even get close i would recon the pressure to do it is already there if prices are already rising have faith in the magic of the market to solve the technical aspects of these things
what? no baka
Daniel Jenkins
fookin luvly fookin go on MAAAH SAAAAHHNNNN wot a fookin ledge he iz mate! fookin 'larious sharin that on me football lads alliance footie page I am, like!
Yeah, will do, I’ve heard there’s a lot of similarities
Brody Sullivan
fookin terrible tha' is. Norvern lads 'lliance cud've dun with them lads they cud've fookin killed in the 'illsburracaust they was, tory manyerfactchad like, fookin police led them boys in like cattle to ther' slorta. neva vote tory again mate.
That's true. Cancer,cancer, people dying from cancer. And todays special feature about cancer. That show is unwatchable ,worse than the One show.
Dylan White
>Read Kaczynski. his mental illness had affected his reasoning so severely that he was unable to see the flaws in his own arguments one bit that string to mind was about events that change the course of history or rather those that don't
here we go
>100. FIRST PRINCIPLE. If a SMALL change is made that affects a long-term historical trend, then the effect of that change will almost always be transitory—the trend will soon revert to its original state. (Example: A reform movement designed to clean up political corruption in a society rarely has more than a short-term effect; sooner or later the reformers relax and corruption creeps back in. The level of political corruption in a given society tends to remain constant, or to change only slowly with the evolution of the society. Normally, a political cleanup will be permanent only if accompanied by widespread social changes; a SMALL change in the society won’t be enough.) If a small change in a long-term historical trend appears to be permanent, it is only because the change acts in the direction in which the trend is already moving, so that the trend is not altered by only pushed a step ahead.
>101. The first principle is almost a tautology. If a trend were not stable with respect to small changes, it would wander at random rather than following a definite direction; in other words it would not be a long- term trend at all.
>102. SECOND PRINCIPLE. If a change is made that is sufficiently large to alter permanently a long-term historical trend, then it will alter the society as a whole. In other words, a society is a system in which all parts are interrelated, and you can’t permanently change any important part without changing all other parts as well.
totally neglects to possibility of many small changes that are unable to change the stable long term trend permanently summing together for an effect great enough to have a lasting impact
Electricity itself is unsustainable when generated from nuclear power, as there is no safe way to dispose of huge amounts of the radioactive wastes. That is a much more pressing issue than the looming cobalt crisis, and a solution to that problem has not been found yet in all the decades we've had nuclear power, so it is probably incredibly optimistic to suppose we'll develop a solution to a lack of cobalt in time. You have to understand that the demand for cobalt is about to increase dramitically, because car manufacturers are ramping up the design and production of electric vehicles. Electric cars use batteries that need a fucking boatload of cobalt, something like over a 1000 times more than lithium-ion batters in laptops and phones.
>they'll invent a new type of laptop battery before we even get close i would recon It would already need to have been developed and introduced, with the Li-on technologies being phased out already. There is no end to it in sight, and vehicular batteries dramtically worsen the problem.
>have faith in the magic of the market to solve the technical aspects of these things It was the market that helped create the problem in the first place, and I have absolutely no faith in it whatsoever to resolve the technological emergencies we will soon face when it itself is propagating them. It's laughable.
Hudson Myers
fookin torehs raised tha' price of me freddos. Just loike annudah illsburracaust at is. Fookin toreh couhnts.
>totally neglects to possibility of many small changes that are unable to change the stable long term trend permanently summing together for an effect great enough to have a lasting impact
It largely depends on the form of the trend, and the form of the changes.
If the changes tackle the reason then of course they will affect it. For example duertes drug policy, what we have there is an extreme zero tolerance approach involving murder etc, will it have an effect? Time will tell.
Caleb Nelson
>>totally neglects to possibility of many small changes that are unable to change the stable long term trend permanently summing together for an effect great enough to have a lasting impact but it's possible i don't know how many straw it takes to break a camels back but it can tell you tit's definitely a finite number that a mathematician didn't read this back and immediately realise he hadn't considered that suggest to me that his mental illness was quite severe but i think the bombs demonstrated that much better desu
don't worry really my point was that that we don't ever reach cliff edge there are other green ways to power cars if they emissions free car market grows to fast they will switch to something else they won't keep or making cars that are becoming to expensive the market won't bear it
>totally neglects to possibility of many small changes that are unable to change the stable long term trend permanently summing together for an effect great enough to have a lasting impact The "manifesto" Industrial Society And Its Future could not afford to address every single factor of every single issue it contains because publication of it in a major newspaper demanded a certain degree of brevity. He does mention this a couple of times. You're just trying to poke holes in irrelevant parts of his argument. You cannot dismiss the important, core points raised. Many a smarter man than you has tried, and all of them have failed. Read the excerpts of his back-and-forth correspondence with Dr. Skrbina and his "unnamed colleague" for a good example of that.
Lincoln Davis
I don’t know, I think in general I would agree with him, but it depends on the provenance of the trend.
Chase Wright
>his mental illness He was completely sane. He is completely sane. Can you say the same about yourself? I question your sanity a damn sight more than I question his, bombings or no bombings.
Hudson White
>really my point was that that we don't ever reach cliff edge We're almost there now. Wait and see. Are we going to go over it? Probably.
Jaxson Hughes
Would you say brevik was sane? Just curious
Julian Fisher
but the whole sum of small things is very fundamental mathematical idea to create what look like they are meant to axioms but to have such an obvious omission baka the man was very sick if you're not mathematicians i doubt you would understand how painful it is to read it's very sad story desu youtube.com/watch?v=SPe2EwzGK48
no my point is real cliff are almost impossible what you think is a cliff is really a steep slope and it smooths out at the bottom it's the stopping suddenly that kills you desu youtube.com/watch?v=jkje4FiH9Qc
Chase Ross
Breivik was pretty crazy, but I wouldn't call him insane.
Nolan Murphy
I understand your point, my point is that it really depends on the provenance of the trend as to whether small culminative actions have an affect, I would say generally in history, they don’t have any long term effect.
Robert Adams
Are they comparable?
James Sanchez
>but the whole sum of small things is very fundamental mathematical idea Kaczynski was an accomplished and published Mathematician with several degrees in the subject. He was a professor of mathematics at Berkely. What are your credentials?
Only in that they were both terrorists. Kaczynski was far more intelligent in my opinion, and it's his cause that I agree with more.
Mason Gutierrez
i can't even think of a good example from history to demonstrate the idea that not really the point when you try and create fundamental rules they should encompass all possibilities not just the things you've seen it's obvious stuff really youtube.com/watch?v=mthPiiCS24A
haven't watched this channel in ages so good when there's loads to watch
Jonathan Torres
>What are your credentials? good old old a levels are enough to understand what i'm saying desu i have no doubt the ted was brilliant before he descended into madness but by the time he wrote that his mind was clearly broken
>by the time he wrote that his mind was clearly broken No it wasn't. You've tried to pick one small hole in his argument and haven't even managed to do that, and you're trying to say his mind was broken? I think it's you who's fucked up, mate. Not him. Yes he did kill people, but if you focus solely on his literary works on industrial society and its future then you can't deny he is a sane, rational and exceptionally intelligent man. He hit the nail smack bang on the head, but reading ASAIF isn't enough to determine that by itself. You have to read his supporting arguments.
Matthew Rogers
Love doesn't need an age limit, we should love whoever we choose.