Finding the "new world" was a mistake

reminder that people have been going back and forth to the new world way before coloumbo

Obviously it was a mistake. You're crying now about invaded by niggers but you were the first ones who invaded native Americans.

being invaded by*

At the time of this map the California was thought to be an island.

Bullshit.

Just one more thing

Can anyone redpill me on who were truly the first sea faring people?

Attached: IMG_2856.png (750x1334, 1.43M)

>The pole is a complete cuck

Imagine my shock

Attached: 1520556034502.gif (500x250, 1002K)

Haha so it's ok when you destroy someone's culture but it isn't okay when they destroy yours? Typical Australian mentality.

What if the new world discovered us instead?

Attached: 3c62c79a8417b407c1b52c9f7c939070.jpg (900x600, 101K)

the Radhinites or some thing like that, they had ports all over the Med and as far north as Scotland. over 2000 years ago.

probably east or maybe subcon asian

Worshipping dirt isnt a culture. Just like being a scourge on superior nations like Germany and Russia isn't a culture.

Fucking polecucks.

Are you a retard?

How to get to America easily 2000 years ago

>build a decent ship
>have decent supplies
>have decent manpower
>sail from Scotland to faroe islands
>sail from fareo islands to Iceland
>sail from Iceland to Greenland
>Greenland to Canada
>canda to America

THE "sight of land route" its called by Mr Thom

this requires people to know that all 4 of those landmasses exist and would potentially be suitable for resupplying. Greenland (((allegedly))) wasn't discovered until 1100~ad and Iceland only a few hundred years before that. To have been travelling to America that way 2000 years ago you have to make the assumption that there was a Northern European civilisation with the capability to build decent ships and had the geographical knowledge to navigate to these landmasses. I don't think this was the case 2000 years ago, but maybe 12000 years ago or more a civilisation existed with this capability

That's exactly how Vikings discovered Vinland

The romans were invading the british isles 2000 years ago. They had ships.

>crossing the English Channel is the same as crossing the North Atlantic Ocean

Solutreans about 24,000 years ago. They actually drew their boats and traveled from the bay Of Biscay to the New World 23,000 years ago. There is proof of whale hunting and seal hunting too.
Everything else is speculation.

Attached: costillo.jpg (576x375, 43K)

yes, and we know that Romans never settled further north than Newcastle/Carlisle because they built a wall there to keep out the Scottish.
is right, there are points on the southern coast of England where you can see France with the naked eye. It's not even close to being the same as crossing the Atlantic Ocean.

the sight of land route. The romans were well established was the example I was trying to make for that other user. The romans mapped round the whole of the british islands

only Germany user mentioned crossing the channel. The sight of land route is by far the safest, never being that far from land.

muh Columbus

Attached: 240px-Roman_Britain_campaigns_43_to_84.jpg (240x449, 40K)

They did, did they map out Greenland, Iceland or Canada?

America built on slavery. Whether you like it or not, that's the truth.

yes

Very little was built with slavery. just some eastern and Southern states, and only agriculture.
Chinese workers did more for the US than Blacks.
Whites did 95% of the building and actual work.

Slaves made up much of the economy at the start of the civil war. Slaves grew their own food, supplied their own clothing so the initial cost of the slave would be paid off after about 8 years. there were over 6 million slaves in the us who were actually skilled carpenters and blacksmiths and your telling me that they contributed less than 5% to the economy?
That doesn't sound right.

this

it was.

Attached: Americas are normales.jpg (345x146, 16K)

> there were over 6 million slaves in the us who were actually skilled carpenters and blacksmiths
>skilled

bwahahahahahahahahaha

There was nowhere near even a million slaves in the U.S. The bulk of them went to the Caribbean or South America.

yeah. that bong is talking out of his ass. probably an inferor shitskin too...

The mistake was the destruction of New France. It had an interesting society where French settlers and Natives worked together for the betterment of the society.
Go read about it.

Wasn't industrialized via slavery, which is what built America from backwater to great power.