>New York City's comptroller Scott Stringer thinks that Mark Zuckerberg should resign as Facebook's chairman, following a scandal with Cambridge Analytica, Business Insider reported Tuesday.
>Stringer, who supervises investments for New York City's pension funds, thinks that Zuckerberg should be replaced with an independent chairman and three new directors with experience in data and ethics.
They are mad at facebook because, supposedly, they helped Trump?
Henry Green
This whole backlash against facebook is because it has been confirmed that facebook is popular among conservatives and it played a large role in electing Trump.
So the left are trying hard to stop conservatives using Facebook, notice it's only aimed at them alone and not the army of other social media businesses that do the exact same thing.
nope, they are mad because he helped dems during the election and then claimed he wanted to become president
Colton Jenkins
how did rockefeller earn the most money? By making a monopoly that was sold and divided. Funny though because the people working in those divisions were still beholden to the original owner but there was a banking and incorporation abstraction layers to obfuscate that link.
Zukerfuck is a rockefeller and going through the same motions his snake oil selling family did a century ago with Standard Oil
Aiden Jackson
>This whole backlash against facebook is because it has been confirmed that facebook is popular among conservatives and it played a large role in electing Trump. What? How? How about the whole analytica thing?
Eli Wood
(((News))) here are always telling that facebook helped Trump somehow.
Dominic Parker
This whole bashing of Facebook will only last until the next election, they do not want trump to get a 2nd term.
If damaging facebook short-term is the price to pay, they will happily pay it.
Almost every social media platform is dominated and controlled by the left, facebook isn't so it's being targeted.
This is a mass propaganda war aimed exclusively at conservatives to try and stop them using facebook.
Cambridge Analytica installed APIs on your phone that stole your entire everything .. phone call logs, text messages, everything .. and they shared all of that with unauthorized third party vendors. (Mostly right wing political scientists).
They're pissed off because Facebook let this happen.
They're also pissed off because Facebook looked the other way when Russia created millions of fake accounts and Cambridge Analytica told Russia to post fake news posts (i.e. pizzagate, etc) and Cambridge Analytica told Russia who to tag, based on the metadata they illegally took.
That's why people are pissed off.
They're pissed off because similar shit happened for non political actors for years prior to the Russia/US election operation.
For years Jow Forums hated Facebook. Now that Dems are on board, what, are you guys gonna be like "wtf I love Facebook now"?
Their stock is down almost 10% in one month. Zuckerberg has lost all his political capital. This is a good thing for America.
Julian Bennett
You wanna know who else Democrats are pissed off with, for allowing a saturation of Russian bot/spam accounts eager to disseminate Russian and GOP propaganda?
Reddit!
Fuck yea I post on Reddit, and I got the spacing to prove it, and people are mad as fuck at u/spez/
Are you guys gonna defend Reddit next?
Camden Hughes
>Cambridge Analytica installed APIs on your phone that stole your entire everything This smells like bullshit knowing how modern phone OS work. Alex Smith? Is that you?
Ian Morgan
Again, nobody would give a fuck if google, twitter or reddit did any of this.
Nobody would even report on it, same as they aren't reporting on the Muslim woman that just shot up youtube.
It's an attack on facebook because it is popular among conservatives and they are trying to make facebook censor them ahead of the next election.
I hate all social media but Facebook is at least less leftists controlled than the rest, as proven by it's importance in getting Trump elected.
Leo Sanders
Reddit did do it and there's currently a boycott on buying gold.
People are mad at the Reddit boss and spokesman u/spez/
Don't put words in my mouth. I'm mad because these assholes let junk accounts exist for years so they could boost clicks, letting them jack up ad prices. This created a vulnerability that Russia easily exploited.
I'm mad because I'm surrounded by junk accounts on all the mainstream social media accounts I used to enjoy, and all the junk accounts are a bunch of fuckin commies
Julian King
back to redit pls
Justin Howard
can you blame Russia. Hillary was going to keep funding ISIS and fuck with Assad. Trump has pulled out finally because he knows pulling out works pretty good after raw dogging porn stars
Facebook is literally the worst place to sell or advertise shit to people. In 2018 it's dead. Full with broken millennials now and factory worker gramps. Along the motherfucking political echochambers worse than Jow Forums. If shareholders want him out that's because of revenue, tanked growth model and fallen stock prices but this shit has been going on for 3 year by now. He fucked it up massively with snapchat and instagram with whatsapp is flat too.
Michael Peterson
we are literally surrounded with retarded people, user.
Jeremiah Garcia
how long before jewbook turns into myspace?
Bentley Bell
Idk but if they don't change something radical by the end of 2019 for sure it will be a graveyard. Right now in my motherfucking country it's all about insta. Fb is like saying I have an email at Google, so fucking what? Know of local businesses that haven't updated their profiles since 2014 and tons of people who haven't logged in since 2016. People get 250usd chink phones with 6" screens they skip on tablets pick the devices that have somewhat decent battery life and easy menus, some chinese manufacturers are retarded with the android. Tinder is not a thing really more just about flirting. Nearly every decent looking person is running around wherever taking pics trying to become an influencer to use his/her instagram as ad space for extra cash. And for communication it's Whatsapp. Telecom prices are like the lowest here in Europe.
Samuel Hall
Lmfao!
Carter Edwards
The deep state will put him down, he is nothing to worry about!
Leo Jackson
I don't know, user, but I sure as hell can't wait for the next week when Zuckercuck will go in front of the congress. Someone has to go guns-blazin' over this retarded faggot.
Oliver Davis
Thing is though Zuckerberg isn't just some amoral technocrat, Zuckerberg is a bluepilled true believer who isn't even 1% aware of the fact that he's an amoral technocrat. Guy is probably on suicide watch for thinking that he accidentally got Trump elected, the same way a 7 year old might feel about accidentally breaking a window. First time they came at him for the Russian ads he was just like 'no way, facebook can't do that, we don't have that much influence' Then when it sank in that it was serious he went into hiding. When they came back for the Cambridge Analytica stuff he just went straight back into hiding. I never believed this faggot was anything special and his reaction fucking proves it. He's not some genius who invented a new thing or found a new market or got their first or even just some lucky asshole, he's just this spoiled jew inheritor who was built up to be something much bigger than what he is. He's just moot with jews. If moot was a jew, this place would be fucking facebook. Expect a big public apology followed by a huge draw down in public appearances, followed by his name only coming up in the media to make note of his charity work. He will step back from leadership but remain central to the company. He'll just follow the Bill Gates playbook basically.
Landon Russell
>next week when Zuckercuck will go in front of the congress Is that a wish or its happening?
No joke, Aussanon. Dude will testify in precisely 7 days (11th of April) before the congress. >rt.com/usa/423168-mark-zuckerberg-will-testify/ If you're picky, you get the same news confirmed also by the MSM faggots fron CNN, NBC, Haaretz, you name it.
Logan Morris
Zuckerberg has a control position in FBOOK through separate share class with super voting rights. Springer and the pension fund have the common stock and no ability to effect a change of board in any way. His goal is undoubtedly political, ie suppressing nationalist and right leaning views, suppress dissent, control " ways of seeing" etc. Right out of Jewish handbook, talmud.
Jonathan Lopez
cuck
Jackson Sanchez
desu baka
William Moore
Facebook is hardly the only facial recognition technology that exists, but this company in particular is being challenged because its capabilities are so powerful
Facebook, according to the company, is able to accurately identify a person 98 percent of the time.
Law enforcement officials can issue a warrant for any information available on Facebook, including tagged photos.
No. It will turn into Windows, a big leaky battleship that keeps getting grandfathered into a smaller and smaller market share every generation. If we're lucky it'll got he way of AOL and the average consumer will outgrow it (not likely) More likely Twitter or a newcomer from one the big companies will fill the void with a nice idiot proof interface to the internet.
Myspace had a completely different set of problems, i.e. thought they were rock stars or record agents when they should have been programmers. Also reliance on the MS stack which further dissuaded talent from coding for them. Also their location. They sank their own ship well enough by just being incompetent through and through. Facebook had a rough start too but they made the necessary changes, Myspace didn't even know what it should have been doing.
Easton Campbell
I meant as in going from billion active users to 50.000 active users. Or whatever the numbers are
Henry Gray
>98 percent Whats fbi's accuracy?
Jace Wilson
It's in the article with an explanation of the difference.
Andrew Bell
That seems like fbi is actually better. They get 85% with a single photo from millions of photos whereas fb gets 98% from a handful of photos. Different data didferent algorithms, unfair to compare
