Debunk the Meme

Attached: Jewtube+censors+videos+because+of+the+adverse+i+have+gotten+_2921f5bb8aa2df844d3d5864597dd9a3.png (652x438, 39K)

history may not repeat, but it rhymes.

If you remove a book from circulation and illegalise it, you get shot of it permanently and universally. Removing a video takes it from one site, and that site alone.

people who buy books are private individuals.
You don't have the right to confiscate and burn my property.

Are there any lists of which books the Nazi's burned? Or did the Nazi's make good choices on burning Jewish Deceptions and other degenerate ideas.

It's one thing if the Nazi's were burning books on Physics to keep their population stupid. It is something much different if they were burning the 1930's equivalent of 57 Genders And How To Get More Freaks For Your Orgy.

reminder that the federal government does not think you have the right to publish material on the manufacture of weapons

No I'm not, I'm just saying that YouTube doesn't have any obligation to keep the things on their platform that they don't like. Yes YouTube is leftist, what do you do? Go and try on another site! The book publisher is leftist, what do you do? Go and try with another publisher!

buybulls hopefully

Attached: youtube red terror.jpg (1321x576, 235K)

/thread

Not OP but if the publisher or company wants to portray a certain image e.g progressive, then the YouTuber (who’s main source of income is YouTube) should probably align their videos and image with that

>comparing Nazis to Youtube
Well, then don't go on Youtube, you stupid faggot!
YouTube is not a given right, it's a private company that can do whatever they fucking please with the servers that THEY (not you) pay for!

I don't see an argument here. It doesen't matter if it's private company or entire country. Führer had every legal right to make stuff vanish in their country just like CEO of Google has every legal right to make stuff vanish in their company.

it's not different though.
all ideas from physics to DIY orgies should exist.
ever idea needs its antithesis, its opposite, its balance.
Similar to tearing down confederate statues, and burning books, deleting videos is destroying ideas, no matter how bad, offensive, or illogical they are.

They burned pornography and degenerative kike books that were of the frankfurt school level of degeneracy like freud and many others.
It was completely justified.

Attached: Capture_000-copy.jpg (453x330, 38K)

Fucking libertarians are the worst.

YouTube
>Upload video on YouTube
>Demonetized/taken down
>Try another site
>Gets accepted
Nazi Germany
>Publish book
>Gets taken down
>SS knocks on your door
>Get shot

I'm libertarian?

So go publish your book somewhere else.

You would think that a company like You Tube would be proud enough to say it out loud, then. Why would a company start banning opinions it didn't like without making clear statements about doing it? Are they afraid of people creating a rival platform? Are they afraid of giving certain ideas publicity?

How powerful does an idea have to be before someone decides to ban discussion of it at all? Which ideas are the supposedly superior Lefties so afraid of? How is a "wrong" idea so powerful that it can't be trusted in the minds of the masses?

It is truth that the Modern Left fears above all else. Truth, because their world empire is built on lies. Don't be a coward, start talking about Leftist hatred of truth and watch them shiver in a fit of shame and hate.

In Nazi Germany? Pretty sure it would be either not available to the public or get taken down fast by the government.
I wanted to show the difference that if YouTube takes you down you still have a choice, but if it's the government it gets a lot harder

>Why would a company start banning opinions it didn't like without making clear statements about doing it?
Jews ALWAYS do this. They don't know anything else. It's in their collective unconscious to shut it down. It's not just a fucking meme user.

I'm trying to make the point that you lefty heroes are scared of discussion of certain ideas. Much like the Conservatives were/still are scared of Kinky Sex discussion.

I am also trying to make the point that banning Physics is a worse offense than banning discussion of Kinky Sex. The quality of people who study Physics tends to be much higher than the quality of people who study Kinky Sex. The Modern Left doesn't want such truths spoken and I want to know why.

>How powerful does an idea have to be before someone decides to ban discussion of it at all?

Attached: kike strike2.jpg (1574x1542, 474K)

Nazi book burnings were burning Communist and Kike literature along with pornography.

>YouTube is a private company

I reject this notion. With the way the world, and internet even moreso works, I cannot accept that a company with this much reach, power and control is "just a company". Were there any relevant competitor to YouTube or any hope for an average person to be a competitor I may agree.

How did free speech look under nazi germany? Honest question. I imagine it was restricted speech, not that that’s inherently bad when the speech restricted is gay propaganda and such like Russia.

The Danger of Americanism

When we speak of young Europe and its young nations, we contrast them to the senile world of dying liberalism which, under the leadership of Jewry, is once more gathering all its material resources in an attempt to forever subject the world to the power of money under the domination of those who have it. They want to perpetuate the social injustice they find so comfortable. More is involved than differences between ages and generations, however.

Our camp includes not only those who are young enough to topple the old and build a new world. It includes all those spiritual forces that see the new in the collapse of the old, who want to build a new future with new ways and means.

The triumph of the Copernican worldview over the unfruitful dogma of the past, the triumph of science over empty faith, was a victory of youth. They followed the shining examples of their predecessors. The youth have always been the battering ram that helped bring the national idea to fruition. The discovery of the laws of inheritance has been the occasion and guidepost of a new youth movement that builds on the eternal culture-building values of race and blood. They lead from the deadly and destructive lethargy of materialism to the new world of tomorrow.

Today it is as it always was in times of revolution. Those fighting for the new have more to offer the youth than those who live in yesterday, who hold to what they have grown accustomed to, even if it has long since become rigid, empty and stifling. We offer the youth the freedom to develop their nation, even in the case of smaller nations. We offer them room for creative fantasy, the opportunity to transform great thoughts to reality outside the lecture hall. We offer the realization of dreams on a world scale, a common Germanic will, a common European will. We fill the spiritual vacuum left by liberalism with the magic of a worldview that draws self-confidence and meaning to life from race and the blood of one’s ancestors.

What does old England have to offer its youth to justify the war’s requirements? It cannot even begin to solve its own social problems, much less offer anything to other peoples. Where is there a healthy youth that is on fire for Bolshevism? It was a danger only during the spiritual interregnum that followed the First World War. In the face of an inadequate yesterday, it was the only force, the only revolutionary movement, available, and anything was better than nothing.

Today Bolshevism may have reached its material and organizational pinnacle on the bent backs of its devotees, but as a spiritual movement it is finished. The crass incompetence of its methods and goals have proven it to be the very epitome of capitalist slavery.

The only remaining alternative is Americanism. As strange as it may sound, it is the only serious competition to National Socialism’s racial worldview in the struggle for the youth, in the struggle for the future of humanity. In the end, however, it is only a forerunner of Bolshevism.

Americanism is certainly not a spiritual movement, nor is it a worldview that it is possible to oppose at the intellectual level. Its political beneficiaries have tried in recent years to give it, if not a face, at least a program or a goal: “the American Century.” It is a collection of empty promises of the type democratic orators have always made — but this time on a world scale. There is nothing in them to excite a reasonable man. But that is exactly the point of Americanism! The key is not what it promises, but what it cannot promise. The key is not what it demands of men, but what gives them.

That would not matter if the world’s youth were of the sound character that develops from racially conscious lines, tradition-rich families, good upbringing and close camaraderie. But that is not the way things are. The good fairy will not give youth the values they will need in life. The racially sound youth can be inspired by virtue of his blood. But the blood does not tell him what should inspire him. He can be misled into serving a bad cause. He can squander his enthusiasm if he matures in a spiritual vacuum. One should not underestimate the danger of Americanism, or its seductive power. It offers devotion to a culture of nothingness, independence, lack of restraint, a freedom from all obligation, from all honor, from all consideration.

We do not wish to deny this culture of nothingness its right to exist. It can even, rightly used, be good, just as it is sometimes a pleasure to do nothing. Should a German soldier happen to find a portable record player and jazz records in the deserted quarters of British or American soldiers, he does not smash them against the wall. Instead, he takes them along and thinks he has a great treasure. We don’t want to suggest excessive cultural disaster here. There are times when he wants a vacation from himself, from us, from the whole world. He needs to relax, and certainly does not wish to ponder intellectual matters. Nothing is better suited to take him out of the normal world than the complete nonsense of this hot music, this cacophony of animal howls, wild instruments, and foot-stomping Negro lust. It takes him away from human concerns back to the depths of pre-human apedom, returning him to the time when people did not need to think because there was no past and no future. Its effect is like that of alcohol, which turns normally rational men into shouting, destructive children. That can sometimes be good for serious and intelligent men. And the soldier certainly does not forget his German mission, nor does he lose his character or honor when he occasionally spends an hour relaxing to entertaining music. He is immune to the danger of confusing this rhythmic pig grunting with good music, much less art or culture. It cannot meet his higher standards.

Others, however, are not as immune. That is what those who deny any appeal of Americanism forget.

Certainly there is no danger that our young boys and girls will fall into sexual frenzy while listening to some Jewish lout blowing on a saxophone. One can introduce them to the high priests of the American jitterbug with no worries at all. At most they will laugh. Our young Luftwaffe aides and working girls would hardly join in a dance marathon. And the winning couple running through the arena in tattered, sweaty clothes would receive not applause, but a beating. But that is our youth. They are made of different stuff, and grew up in a world in which dignity comes from doing one’s duty, and both are seen not as a burden but as the joy of life.

That may be self-evident to us, but it is not so to others. Whole nations behave in ways not guided by clear tasks. They are only individuals, parents, teachers, tribes and groups, able to lead them out of error and confusion into a clear world of meaning. We may not forget that during the tragic years following the First World War, a significant part of our youth too fell under the appeal of Americanism, waving their limbs in the Shimmy and the Charleston because there was nothing else to do.

We sometimes fail to see that there are young people in Europe today — often from the so-called better classes — who not only do not stand within the camp of young Europe, but even mock or scorn it. Many of us simply cannot understand how there can be a mass meeting at a Norwegian university protesting those who are risking their lives in the east for the freedom and security of their native land, or how Swedish students, even if they do not jump to the side of their Finnish brothers, do not at least follow their struggle with respect.

These young men surely are not consciously supporting the plans of Stalin and Roosevelt. Thank God, this small part of Europe’s youth is not a politically aware counterpart to the European youth defending young Europe in the east. Those who think politically and act from conviction demonstrate it through their actions. The others have followed the comfortable path that leads from political thinking to Americanism.

That is the political danger of Americanism. It leads those who fall prey to it away from political thinking, away from responsibility, even to their nation, away from decency, even from national decency.

The American lad may use fine phrases to say that the nationalist is his political enemy. In reality, however, he fights a man who makes uncomfortable and difficult demands on him, the man who recognizes the fate of the nation as his fate, who respects the woman who will become the mother of his children, who wants to be a model, who always acts as if the eyes of the nation are upon him. The American lad feels his “freedom” restricted by such behavior. He wants to keep the hot music spinning on the record player, not be reminded that he must work as well as relax, that he must not only enjoy, but also honor the dignity of his nation.

Attached: lenny pozner kike strike2.jpg (2546x1562, 1.13M)

That is neither comfortable nor pleasant. It is pleasant to talk slang and enjoy a loose moral life with those of like mind. Americanism has its delights, and he who is captivated by them not only sticks his head in the sand, he also gets some pleasure. It is nice to be able to dismiss all criticism of a too hearty enjoyment of life with the claim that one is defending human rights against Nazi brutality.

Americanism is not a logical development. It certainly does not spring from the descendants of the Virginia colonists with their Prussian sense of honor and duty, nor from the healthy farmers and citizens of the Midwest. It did not triumph easily against the often overdone moralism of Puritan circles. Its power grew along with that of Jewry. As is the case of everything that follows the orders of Jewry, Americanism’s lack of culture and morality, its freedom-promising “Century of the Child,” is nothing but a concealed way of ruining the youth.

Americanism is a splendid method of depoliticization. The Jews have used jazz and movies, magazines and smut, gangsterism and free love, and every perverse desire, to keep the American people so distracted that they pay no attention to their own fate. Even in politics, they are no longer influenced by the head, only by what is under the belt.

The Jews would not be Jews if they did not want to apply such tested methods to the entire world. Nearly every nation in the world faced or is facing the need to combat Americanism, a generally pleasant retreat to a barbaric lack of culture.

The logical consequences of Americanism will help the world combat it. The fact that 60% of American crimes are committed by children 13 years old and under and that rapes increased three-fold between 1942 and 1943 proves that Americanism has reached its limits. It will provoke a counter-movement that, just as in Europe, can only be political.

Americanism is not merely a moral-cultural form of degeneration, nor can it be combated by nonpolitical means. It has already been defeated when one digs it up by its roots and sees there plainly the words: “Made in Israel.”

Marsh v. Alabama
Just because you own the street doesn't mean I can't exercise my rights on the street.
Fucking Krautfag

There is nothing fundamentally wrong with cencorship.

I think there is something wrong about burning books unless its a pile of qurans being burned inside a full mosque locked from the outside.

Attached: 1430734031365.jpg (457x378, 36K)

And a country is a sovereign state which chooses who can and can't do business in it.

Youtube should be nationalized.

yeah it's called a monopoly

we used to have such things as anti-trust laws before kikes purchased our government

the kikes not only have a total 100% over all media but a neat total monopoly over the internet as well and extention a monopoly over all goy thoughts and opinions

Attached: DESTROY ZOG.jpg (600x800, 69K)

*and by extension a monopoly over all goy thoughts and opinions

Attached: jewmedia2.png (1699x1638, 1.28M)

I unironically agree that the Library of Congress should in fact provide a free speech platform since the market is incapable of it for more than a few years.

So this is what the ancaps wanted

i'm not a lefty though.
the term "well read" comes to mind here. One should strive to be well read while steeling their mind against corruption from the things they read, from physics, kinky sex books, to manifestos.

>implying burning degenerate commie shit is bad

Lots of what was burnt was Marxist theories, (((Weimar))) literature and transvestite shit.

Have a look into Magnus Hirschfeld. He created the term 'Transvestite', proscribed gay men with gay sex orgies and promoted degeneracy. Funnily enough he was an Ashkenazi. The NatSocs chased him out of Germany and burnt loads of his shit.

>how did free speech look
Wasn't great but there was some room for dissent. A small amount of dissent but dissent nonetheless.

The book burning in OP's pick was primarily pornagraphic, homosexual propaganda, marxist, and other devant texts that were written or conceived of during the Weimar Republic. The reason they did so is because those ideas were corrupting German society to its foundation which is part of the reason the Nazis gained popularity so quickly. There was a problem, and they offered a solution that wasn't throwing culture to the side for the concept of Marx's "new man." Was it the best solution? Who's to judge given the current state of Germany and the absolute dissulisonent of the German people.

The funny thing is durning the post-war occupation the Allies burned many texts as well including works by von Clausewitz, the man credited with outlining the the concept of total war in his book "On War." The people who fought for "freedom" were doing the exact opposite of what they preached. This is very similar as to what we are seeing today with modern mass media. They don't burn books, but they do the equivalent of discrediting the author instead of the work itself. When the work itself is address it is usually some half assed attempt by some self titled intellectual who has spent far to long in academia.

Attached: 1519567346984.png (1140x318, 218K)

Only the cowardly and stupid are afraid of knowledge.

Not all of ancaps wanted I just want to be able to own my house, car and land. Also pack all the Non Western Muslims and ship them back to Middle east

>tfw think of all the memes you know about different races
>tfw a lot of them, while based on fact, have a lot of embellishment
>tfw the only ones which aren't embellished are ones related to Jews

It genuinely amazes me how accurate they are. I sometimes think that maybe the Jewish are the ones behind the stereotypes of other races, just so they can point to such stereotypes and say "well X isn't true for Y, it's just a stereotype, just like Z isn't true for Jews, it's just a stereotype", but the difference is Z is always fucking true.

Finally! A funny German. Never thought I'd see the day.

It is dangerous to leave written that which is written poorly. And in the same vein, it is dangerous to leave spoken that which is spoken poorly. A random word, penned on paper, may destroy the world. I would advise he who attempts to write to watch carefully and erase while the power is still yours, for all that is transferred from inkhorn, to quill, to paper, once it escapes, may rot a thousand minds. And the heart of which may become black as sin and all the libraries, as a necessity, will have to be burned to the ground as a consequence.

really Muslim that are Wahhbis and takes the Quran out of Context (Moslty all Muslims)Lucky me I use my head

>Krautposting this hard
Nice bantz hans.

Look up the most commonly books burned by Nazis. Post results.

Only one answer: write carelessly so that nothing that is not green will survive.
This is Creative destruction. People should be invited to take on the immense risk of writing for the sake of the potential to destroy over time what is badly written.

How is this relevant?

>t. Thousand sons

Attached: 4a143bd925d9920dd587c132b1294aca.jpg (1024x667, 160K)

YouTube/Google is a globalist monopoly on a grand scale. There are no competitors. Foreign governments like N Korea, China, and Iran can insert prohibited words or ideas into the algorithms to interfere with countries that have free speech.

Nor do I have a right to stop you burning a book you purchased. That's not the point.

The unfortunate issue is that companies like google now have power that rivals nations. And while citizens of different nations have constitutions and laws guaranteeing (or restricting in some cases) rights, there is no such recourse to a private institution short of the government taking it over themselves. Which ain't gonna happen.
So, now we're stuck with exceedingly powerful entities against which we have limited recourse.
Welcome to a brave new world.