Ask an anti-fascist and anti radical left anything

Those are dictators, autocracies not fascism
Try again

With that in mind, do you think there is any significant support for fascism today?

What about national syndicalism which puts unions and guilds in charge of the economy?

Authoritarian nationalism with suppressed opposition and violently enforced hierarchy with corporatism*

Nope it's literally the definition of fascism. But please tell me your interpretation

oops

Say did YHVH say this?

Attached: THE LAST JUDGMENT - YHVH.jpg (748x673, 139K)

Nahhh

Everyone hates le superior centrist around here, newfag

Can Jews be metal?

Attached: 0C643A0D-6ED6-4303-93A8-FE4B5FFD665A.jpg (1170x1200, 461K)

Lacks authoritarian submission and it is not inherently clear that a hierarchy should be enforced. It resembles communism more than fascism, still lacking authoritarian figures though...

Am I centrist because I detest the extremes?

Are people who hold serious convictions and beliefs fucking losers?

Attached: guesswhatnerd.jpg (97x84, 6K)

Than why did most national syndicalists oppose both communism and capitalism?

>anti-fascist and anti radical left
Those are the same thing. Why are you so dumb?

Significant yes, but not enough to change any global political landscape. Some notions of fascism drives countries to the right of the spectrum, see Poland for example, but its "true" form is probably not to be found in the modern world. Note modern, not fucking Africa or some shit

Fuckin A, I would listen to that.

Because it is neither, and once a theory deters even slightly from others, the differences are enhanced and the similarities are diminished in its expression

If you are anti-authoritarian, you are libertarian. Fascism and radical left are both highly authoritarian

Well its extreme manifestations are often the same result, but in the theory one of the differences is hierarchy and declassification. Also in theory, not praxis, the economic distribution is different

Bor du i Christiania?

I don't think that is a precise definition of libertarianism

Nej, er du klar over hvor få der bor der?

Yes - libertarians are the opposite of authoritarian

If all their "serious convictions" fall into a predefined matrix that can be described with one to five words then absolutely.

Anarchists oppose authority. So anarchy = libertarian?
I'm not saying they don't, I am just saying there are more parameters that you have to measure before you can label me libertarian

You dont know what a fascist is.
Get of Jow Forums, fag.

Attached: rustyshackleford.jpg (500x500, 37K)

You've described every country in the world prior to 1914

Tell me then

Why is literally everything support at the benefit of the Neo-liberal establishment you supposedly hate?

>corporations using cheap foreign labor

NO BORDERS!

>working class expresses opinions

LET'S DESTROY THEIR PROPERTY

>wanting to preserve your nation's wealth and resources for future generations

PUNCH NAZIS!

That's a little too specific for my taste. Too easy for a shitheel regime to pull the wool over most people's eyes.
>no this isn't facist at all
>this is a neoprotectionist oligarchy with hints of economic socialism
>clearly different
The second someone is trying to use the law to silence those they don't agree with, the second it is facism.

We didn't really suppress opposition in Denmark at that time

wut

>So anarchy = libertarian?
Yes - Right wing anarchists are Anarcho-Capitalists.

Left wing "anarchists" have appropriated the label and advocate greater governmental control.

Attached: wants-more-government-cg-bll-more-government-usa-com-5930688.png (500x513, 185K)

Attached: DZqmtMGUMAEpJl0.jpg (720x482, 27K)

No, you're too retarded to talk to.
Literally kill your faggot self.

Attached: images.jpg (190x169, 6K)

Well there are clear detractions between the theories. Not that any manifestations of these are any good

Fair point

.

Attached: 1515408488667.png (700x549, 22K)

>being anywhere but the lower right corner

But the Preamble to the United states is an introduction to its tenants and its constitution. Is written law not to rigid for it to approximate anarchy?

Attached: b68.jpg (200x301, 14K)

That is some contradictory statement isn't it?

Attached: 1509767683880.jpg (788x675, 118K)

Anarchy does not mean "no rules" - it means "no rulers". Morality and ethics still apply. In fact, libertarianism absolutely encourages morality since individual is responsible for themselves.

The US constitution is "common law" which is morality and ethics. "Law" as we know it is statute law which are, "you did something I don't like so now I can fine you and if you dont accept the fine I can jail you and if you resist I can beat you to death"

Attached: SArtre.jpg (600x600, 44K)

I don't think I understand

Attached: 1492260378424.jpg (480x531, 25K)

Why are nordicucks more likely to be leftist liberals than sovthern evropeans?

Attached: __anchovy_girls_und_panzer_and_megami_drawn_by_yoshida_nobuyoshi__sample-a5b4e6dbd900107ef7a4ec2048b (850x1237, 259K)

Sheeran is a bug-eyed cunt, who writes shitty mediocre music and only got where he is because he's friends with the royals

I wish he'd just fuck off

Bong pls

Attached: 1509767711035.jpg (562x570, 106K)

Who would you rather have Butt-Sex with...?

Would you tell...?

Attached: ChurchHitler.jpg (664x294, 32K)

Well, the political environment is a lot more agreeable than most places, meaning that everything drifts toward the center. There is a higher degree of individualism and temperament in southern europe. I am not sure why solidarity struck northern europe as a pillar of political discussion, but it is interesting

While I like to think of myself as rational, Sheeran and the Z U C K are the only two people that can convince me that we are subjugated to lizard rule

Do you like mayonnaise?